Continental Aero 111

Wheels, Tires, Tubes, Tubeless, Tubs, Spokes, Hookless, Hubs, and more!

Moderator: robbosmans

Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.

If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
Lakal
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:20 pm

by Lakal

cajer wrote:
Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:53 pm
Lakal wrote:
Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:19 am
IMG_8306 (1).jpg

Just received the 29mm version.
Compared to a GP5000 clincher, the surface is a lot more smooth.
What's the weight of the two tires?
I didn't weigh them. But the specified weight is the same for both (280 grams)

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



BigBoyND
Posts: 1621
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 1:51 am

by BigBoyND

So these will likely see similar RR to the S TR. Hopefully there will be a 111 TT version with the TT TR as the base. Otherwise they are leaving speed on the table.

Or maybe the tread on the TT TR isn't deep enough for these cutouts.

Lakal
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:20 pm

by Lakal

Just measured again and it's 30mm now after 30 hours and a 80k ride yesterday.
I noticed that the tire seemed to attract almost every stone on the road for the first 100 metres or so. I don't remember if that's also the case with the other GP5000 versions? Last time I had that experience was with Vittoria Next.

adamallo
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2022 5:09 am

by adamallo

BigBoyND wrote:
Wed Jul 10, 2024 6:27 pm
So these will likely see similar RR to the S TR. Hopefully there will be a 111 TT version with the TT TR as the base. Otherwise they are leaving speed on the table.

Or maybe the tread on the TT TR isn't deep enough for these cutouts.
I got the 26c version and just measured the depth of the cutouts at ~1mm in the deepest section. According to BRR, the S have 3 layers of casing in the sidewalls and 2 + vectran under the tread, while the TTs keep the same casing under the tread (with less rubber) but have only 2 layers of casing in the sidewalls. Considering the center of the TT measures 1.8mm and the sidewalls 0.8mm, I think BigBoyND is right, and they could not make an Aero 111 with the current TT construction (1.8-1 = 0.8, which is the thickness of the sidewalls, so no space left for the vectran). Of course, they could make a version with the sidewall construction of the TTs but with more rubber in the tread.

According to the exploded views of the Aero 111 that circulate online, the construction structure is the same as the S TR.

User avatar
208
Posts: 421
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 6:57 pm

by 208

did ag2r run the 111 on their tt bikes? or just their road bikes?

if they're only running them on their road bikes, chances are there is a tt version coming. the aero 111 tt s sl tr rs tlr

OtterSpace
Posts: 485
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2020 6:28 am
Location: California Silicon Valley

by OtterSpace

208 wrote:
Wed Jul 10, 2024 11:47 pm
did ag2r run the 111 on their tt bikes? or just their road bikes?

if they're only running them on their road bikes, chances are there is a tt version coming. the aero 111 tt s sl tr rs tlr
aero 111! tldr

still better than computer monitor names though

6fu
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2023 10:59 am

by 6fu

Still a lot better than pirelli naming :D

K4m1k4z3
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 1:33 pm

by K4m1k4z3

I know they aren't the fastest in terms of rolling resistance, but this discussion makes me wonder how the Specialized Turbo tyres perform in terms of aerodynamics. The pattern and its placement on the shoulders of the tyre kinda reminds me of vortex generators some companies are putting on the shoulders/arms of TT skinsuits.
Attachments
SWTURBO.jpg
Endura Skin Suit.jpg
'24 S-Works Tarmac SL8 RTP|Ultegra R8100|Alpinist CL / Custom Rapide CLX 2x60
'19 Diverge E5 Comp
'18 Epic HT Comp Carbon WMN
'18 TCR Adv Pro 1 Disc

mrlobber
Posts: 1988
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:36 am
Location: Where the permanent autumn is

by mrlobber

For aero, more often than not what looks like something doesn't perform like that aero-wise :D
Minimum bike categories required in the stable:
Aero bike | GC bike | GC rim bike | Climbing bike | Climbing rim bike | Classics bike | Gravel bike | TT bike | Indoors bike

alanyu
Posts: 1764
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 1:10 pm

by alanyu

K4m1k4z3 wrote:
Thu Jul 11, 2024 8:34 am
I know they aren't the fastest in terms of rolling resistance, but this discussion makes me wonder how the Specialized Turbo tyres perform in terms of aerodynamics. The pattern and its placement on the shoulders of the tyre kinda reminds me of vortex generators some companies are putting on the shoulders/arms of TT skinsuits.
Turbo is one of the worst aero performance tyres. FLO had a test years ago but I think they put it down. My personal experience with Turbo 2BR is they made my wheels much less stable in Xwind compared to GP5K and Pro 1.

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 13235
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

K4m1k4z3 wrote:
Thu Jul 11, 2024 8:34 am
I know they aren't the fastest in terms of rolling resistance, but this discussion makes me wonder how the Specialized Turbo tyres perform in terms of aerodynamics. The pattern and its placement on the shoulders of the tyre kinda reminds me of vortex generators some companies are putting on the shoulders/arms of TT skinsuits.

It’s my understanding that the Aero 111 vortex generators essentially create a wide and virtually shallow continuous trip strip at high RPM for crosswinds flowing over the tire. They don’t work how you think they do. It’s not for reducing drag at 0deg yaw and that’s shown in their own test data.

cleanneon98
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:26 pm

by cleanneon98

6fu wrote:
Thu Jul 11, 2024 7:19 am
Still a lot better than pirelli naming :D
When you actually look at the lineup, its not that complicated. Keep in mind some tires come TLR and non-TLR

Race - similar to 5000 AS TR
Race 4S - not sure what this compares to in conti lineup
Race SL (pretty sure this is going away replaced by the RS)
Race TT - similar to 5000 TT?
Race RS - similar to 5000 S TR
TREK Madone Gen 7 SLR - 7.5kg
TREK Fuel EX Gen 5 - overbuilt and overweight

CampagYOLO
Posts: 880
Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 3:58 pm

by CampagYOLO

cleanneon98 wrote:
Thu Jul 11, 2024 1:17 pm
6fu wrote:
Thu Jul 11, 2024 7:19 am
Still a lot better than pirelli naming :D
When you actually look at the lineup, its not that complicated. Keep in mind some tires come TLR and non-TLR

Race - similar to 5000 AS TR
Race 4S - not sure what this compares to in conti lineup
Race SL (pretty sure this is going away replaced by the RS)
Race TT - similar to 5000 TT?
Race RS - similar to 5000 S TR
Judging by the latest test on BRR the 4S is replacing the Cinturato. So basically a tubeless version of the 4 season or the Gatorskin.

https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.co ... -tlr-4s-32

usr
Posts: 1041
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:58 pm

by usr

Lakal wrote:
Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:31 pm
Just measured again and it's 30mm now after 30 hours and a 80k ride yesterday.
I noticed that the tire seemed to attract almost every stone on the road for the first 100 metres or so. I don't remember if that's also the case with the other GP5000 versions? Last time I had that experience was with Vittoria Next.
This is mostly a question of shelf age of the particular tire in question I think. Fresh from the production line they will pick up everything (and get very low mileage), if it already sat in some warehouse for a few years before eventually finding a buyer observations will be very different.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



TobinHatesYou
Posts: 13235
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

usr wrote:
Thu Jul 11, 2024 10:07 pm
Lakal wrote:
Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:31 pm
Just measured again and it's 30mm now after 30 hours and a 80k ride yesterday.
I noticed that the tire seemed to attract almost every stone on the road for the first 100 metres or so. I don't remember if that's also the case with the other GP5000 versions? Last time I had that experience was with Vittoria Next.
This is mostly a question of shelf age of the particular tire in question I think. Fresh from the production line they will pick up everything (and get very low mileage), if it already sat in some warehouse for a few years before eventually finding a buyer observations will be very different.

Tread patterns matter. Vittoria’s ribbed tread pattern behaves like gecko feet/toes. They pick up small bits of asphalt and grit and fling them at your DT / ST. The grid-like tread on Gravel Kings is also horrible.

The vortex generators on the Aero 111 are basically little shovels to my eyes.

Post Reply