I didn't weigh them. But the specified weight is the same for both (280 grams)
Continental Aero 111
Moderator: robbosmans
Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Just measured again and it's 30mm now after 30 hours and a 80k ride yesterday.
I noticed that the tire seemed to attract almost every stone on the road for the first 100 metres or so. I don't remember if that's also the case with the other GP5000 versions? Last time I had that experience was with Vittoria Next.
I noticed that the tire seemed to attract almost every stone on the road for the first 100 metres or so. I don't remember if that's also the case with the other GP5000 versions? Last time I had that experience was with Vittoria Next.
I got the 26c version and just measured the depth of the cutouts at ~1mm in the deepest section. According to BRR, the S have 3 layers of casing in the sidewalls and 2 + vectran under the tread, while the TTs keep the same casing under the tread (with less rubber) but have only 2 layers of casing in the sidewalls. Considering the center of the TT measures 1.8mm and the sidewalls 0.8mm, I think BigBoyND is right, and they could not make an Aero 111 with the current TT construction (1.8-1 = 0.8, which is the thickness of the sidewalls, so no space left for the vectran). Of course, they could make a version with the sidewall construction of the TTs but with more rubber in the tread.
According to the exploded views of the Aero 111 that circulate online, the construction structure is the same as the S TR.
did ag2r run the 111 on their tt bikes? or just their road bikes?
if they're only running them on their road bikes, chances are there is a tt version coming. the aero 111 tt s sl tr rs tlr
if they're only running them on their road bikes, chances are there is a tt version coming. the aero 111 tt s sl tr rs tlr
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2020 6:28 am
- Location: California Silicon Valley
aero 111! tldr
still better than computer monitor names though
I know they aren't the fastest in terms of rolling resistance, but this discussion makes me wonder how the Specialized Turbo tyres perform in terms of aerodynamics. The pattern and its placement on the shoulders of the tyre kinda reminds me of vortex generators some companies are putting on the shoulders/arms of TT skinsuits.
'24 S-Works Tarmac SL8 RTP|Ultegra R8100|Alpinist CL / Custom Rapide CLX 2x60
'19 Diverge E5 Comp
'18 Epic HT Comp Carbon WMN
'18 TCR Adv Pro 1 Disc
'19 Diverge E5 Comp
'18 Epic HT Comp Carbon WMN
'18 TCR Adv Pro 1 Disc
For aero, more often than not what looks like something doesn't perform like that aero-wise
Minimum bike categories required in the stable:
Aero bike | GC bike | GC rim bike | Climbing bike | Climbing rim bike | Classics bike | Gravel bike | TT bike | Indoors bike
Aero bike | GC bike | GC rim bike | Climbing bike | Climbing rim bike | Classics bike | Gravel bike | TT bike | Indoors bike
Turbo is one of the worst aero performance tyres. FLO had a test years ago but I think they put it down. My personal experience with Turbo 2BR is they made my wheels much less stable in Xwind compared to GP5K and Pro 1.K4m1k4z3 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 8:34 amI know they aren't the fastest in terms of rolling resistance, but this discussion makes me wonder how the Specialized Turbo tyres perform in terms of aerodynamics. The pattern and its placement on the shoulders of the tyre kinda reminds me of vortex generators some companies are putting on the shoulders/arms of TT skinsuits.
-
- Posts: 13235
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
K4m1k4z3 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 8:34 amI know they aren't the fastest in terms of rolling resistance, but this discussion makes me wonder how the Specialized Turbo tyres perform in terms of aerodynamics. The pattern and its placement on the shoulders of the tyre kinda reminds me of vortex generators some companies are putting on the shoulders/arms of TT skinsuits.
It’s my understanding that the Aero 111 vortex generators essentially create a wide and virtually shallow continuous trip strip at high RPM for crosswinds flowing over the tire. They don’t work how you think they do. It’s not for reducing drag at 0deg yaw and that’s shown in their own test data.
-
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:26 pm
When you actually look at the lineup, its not that complicated. Keep in mind some tires come TLR and non-TLR
Race - similar to 5000 AS TR
Race 4S - not sure what this compares to in conti lineup
Race SL (pretty sure this is going away replaced by the RS)
Race TT - similar to 5000 TT?
Race RS - similar to 5000 S TR
TREK Madone Gen 7 SLR - 7.5kg
TREK Fuel EX Gen 5 - overbuilt and overweight
TREK Fuel EX Gen 5 - overbuilt and overweight
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 3:58 pm
Judging by the latest test on BRR the 4S is replacing the Cinturato. So basically a tubeless version of the 4 season or the Gatorskin.cleanneon98 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 1:17 pmWhen you actually look at the lineup, its not that complicated. Keep in mind some tires come TLR and non-TLR
Race - similar to 5000 AS TR
Race 4S - not sure what this compares to in conti lineup
Race SL (pretty sure this is going away replaced by the RS)
Race TT - similar to 5000 TT?
Race RS - similar to 5000 S TR
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.co ... -tlr-4s-32
This is mostly a question of shelf age of the particular tire in question I think. Fresh from the production line they will pick up everything (and get very low mileage), if it already sat in some warehouse for a few years before eventually finding a buyer observations will be very different.Lakal wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:31 pmJust measured again and it's 30mm now after 30 hours and a 80k ride yesterday.
I noticed that the tire seemed to attract almost every stone on the road for the first 100 metres or so. I don't remember if that's also the case with the other GP5000 versions? Last time I had that experience was with Vittoria Next.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
- Posts: 13235
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
usr wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 10:07 pmThis is mostly a question of shelf age of the particular tire in question I think. Fresh from the production line they will pick up everything (and get very low mileage), if it already sat in some warehouse for a few years before eventually finding a buyer observations will be very different.Lakal wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:31 pmJust measured again and it's 30mm now after 30 hours and a 80k ride yesterday.
I noticed that the tire seemed to attract almost every stone on the road for the first 100 metres or so. I don't remember if that's also the case with the other GP5000 versions? Last time I had that experience was with Vittoria Next.
Tread patterns matter. Vittoria’s ribbed tread pattern behaves like gecko feet/toes. They pick up small bits of asphalt and grit and fling them at your DT / ST. The grid-like tread on Gravel Kings is also horrible.
The vortex generators on the Aero 111 are basically little shovels to my eyes.