That's unfortuante. It measured slower than the normal 5000 and it is also thinner than the normal 5000Kubackjeee wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 4:49 pmAnd it's tested. Looks promising and they will be true to size on wider rims
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.co ... l-aero-111
Continental Aero 111
Moderator: robbosmans
Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Do you have any sources, or just a guess? TL was released in 2018, S TR in 2021. So based on timing alone you may be on to something. AS and TT were released in 2023, so maybe not a revision of those?Minirac wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 5:02 pmSo that means new S TR and TT TR on horizon..Kubackjeee wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 4:49 pmAnd it's tested. Looks promising and they will be true to size on wider rims
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.co ... l-aero-111
BRR made the prediction. I think he's mirroring that. I imagine it might be true as well.harblhat wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 5:52 pmDo you have any sources, or just a guess? TL was released in 2018, S TR in 2021. So based on timing alone you may be on to something. AS and TT were released in 2023, so maybe not a revision of those?Minirac wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 5:02 pmSo that means new S TR and TT TR on horizon..Kubackjeee wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 4:49 pmAnd it's tested. Looks promising and they will be true to size on wider rims
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.co ... l-aero-111
Admittedly I don't know exactly how tire production works but it may have something to do with mixing compounds to get the grip / weight / RR etc you want and then producing in mass amounts. If that's the case, if there's a new compound on the AERO 111 to allow that extra grip, maybe conti is about to use it and produce more tires that originate from it.
Again totally guessing out my butt and thinking wishfully. I might be miles off.
-
- Posts: 13259
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
For mass start races I will take 80+ grip score on BRR's scale and a 1W deficit in Crr over high 60s/low 70s grip score and a 1W Crr advantage. Every. single. time. And I'm a breakaway specialist.
-
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:03 am
- Location: Portland, OR USA
Absolutely—it's no contest.TobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 11:51 pmFor mass start races I will take 80+ grip score on BRR's scale and a 1W deficit in Crr over high 60s/low 70s grip score and a 1W Crr advantage. Every. single. time. And I'm a breakaway specialist.
and so will everybody else and that is exactly what have they done. Grip on current STR/TT is so bad but you have to race descends, agressive cornering, bad weather to realize that, to average john it may seems that it is great but it is not.TobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 11:51 pmFor mass start races I will take 80+ grip score on BRR's scale and a 1W deficit in Crr over high 60s/low 70s grip score and a 1W Crr advantage. Every. single. time. And I'm a breakaway specialist.
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 3:58 pm
And if this aero testing is in anyway correct, the aero benefits hugely outweigh the very slight increase in rolling resistanceTobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 11:51 pmFor mass start races I will take 80+ grip score on BRR's scale and a 1W deficit in Crr over high 60s/low 70s grip score and a 1W Crr advantage. Every. single. time. And I'm a breakaway specialist.
https://www.bikeradar.com/news/continen ... front-tyre
Which do you prefer for grip?Minirac wrote: ↑Sat Aug 10, 2024 12:24 pmand so will everybody else and that is exactly what have they done. Grip on current STR/TT is so bad but you have to race descends, agressive cornering, bad weather to realize that, to average john it may seems that it is great but it is not.TobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 11:51 pmFor mass start races I will take 80+ grip score on BRR's scale and a 1W deficit in Crr over high 60s/low 70s grip score and a 1W Crr advantage. Every. single. time. And I'm a breakaway specialist.
I'm not at those yaws enough to notice, I would not chose aero111 from that graph aloneCampagYOLO wrote: ↑Sat Aug 10, 2024 1:00 pmAnd if this aero testing is in anyway correct, the aero benefits hugely outweigh the very slight increase in rolling resistanceTobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 11:51 pmFor mass start races I will take 80+ grip score on BRR's scale and a 1W deficit in Crr over high 60s/low 70s grip score and a 1W Crr advantage. Every. single. time. And I'm a breakaway specialist.
https://www.bikeradar.com/news/continen ... front-tyre
2024 BMC TeamMachine R
2018 BMC TImeMachine Road
2002 Moots Compact-SL
2019 Parlee Z0XD - "classified"
2023 Pivot E-Vault
2018 BMC TImeMachine Road
2002 Moots Compact-SL
2019 Parlee Z0XD - "classified"
2023 Pivot E-Vault
For anyone interested, I asked Swissside if they plan to make any 111 in wider sizing and they said nope.
Try AS TR for reference. Then when you go back to S TR you will have to recalibrate cornering. I end up with 30mm S TR and wide rims same as pogacar: https://youtu.be/Pf5BJqRUyLc?t=793208 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 10, 2024 3:31 pmWhich do you prefer for grip?Minirac wrote: ↑Sat Aug 10, 2024 12:24 pmand so will everybody else and that is exactly what have they done. Grip on current STR/TT is so bad but you have to race descends, agressive cornering, bad weather to realize that, to average john it may seems that it is great but it is not.TobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 11:51 pmFor mass start races I will take 80+ grip score on BRR's scale and a 1W deficit in Crr over high 60s/low 70s grip score and a 1W Crr advantage. Every. single. time. And I'm a breakaway specialist.
but it is still not good enough.
Looks like the Pirelli RS would be a perfect rear tire match for a 111 front. Nearly same tread coverage, RR, and edge grip.
Also interesting to see the 111 is so undersized. Is it to satisfy ETRTO on wider rims while being small in reality to achieve better aero results? No other clincher tires are smaller than nominal on BRR, let alone by a full 1mm. It's smaller than a 28mm S TR.
Also interesting to see the 111 is so undersized. Is it to satisfy ETRTO on wider rims while being small in reality to achieve better aero results? No other clincher tires are smaller than nominal on BRR, let alone by a full 1mm. It's smaller than a 28mm S TR.
BRR tested on a 18.4 ID rim. 29 mm calibrated on 21 ID will naturally be slightly narrower than 28 mm on 18.4 ID when new, and I'm glad that they are true to labellingBigBoyND wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 7:40 amLooks like the Pirelli RS would be a perfect rear tire match for a 111 front. Nearly same tread coverage, RR, and edge grip.
Also interesting to see the 111 is so undersized. Is it to satisfy ETRTO on wider rims while being small in reality to achieve better aero results? No other clincher tires are smaller than nominal on BRR, let alone by a full 1mm. It's smaller than a 28mm S TR.
I'm using an AS TR rear and S TR front. It works well.Minirac wrote: ↑Sat Aug 10, 2024 7:13 pmTry AS TR for reference. Then when you go back to S TR you will have to recalibrate cornering. I end up with 30mm S TR and wide rims same as pogacar: https://youtu.be/Pf5BJqRUyLc?t=793208 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 10, 2024 3:31 pmWhich do you prefer for grip?Minirac wrote: ↑Sat Aug 10, 2024 12:24 pmand so will everybody else and that is exactly what have they done. Grip on current STR/TT is so bad but you have to race descends, agressive cornering, bad weather to realize that, to average john it may seems that it is great but it is not.TobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2024 11:51 pmFor mass start races I will take 80+ grip score on BRR's scale and a 1W deficit in Crr over high 60s/low 70s grip score and a 1W Crr advantage. Every. single. time. And I'm a breakaway specialist.
but it is still not good enough.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
I know about the BRR test conditions. I'm comparing it on this same standard for all other tires. NO other tire on BRR is sized even close to this way.alanyu wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 12:52 pmBRR tested on a 18.4 ID rim. 29 mm calibrated on 21 ID will naturally be slightly narrower than 28 mm on 18.4 ID when new, and I'm glad that they are true to labellingBigBoyND wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 7:40 amLooks like the Pirelli RS would be a perfect rear tire match for a 111 front. Nearly same tread coverage, RR, and edge grip.
Also interesting to see the 111 is so undersized. Is it to satisfy ETRTO on wider rims while being small in reality to achieve better aero results? No other clincher tires are smaller than nominal on BRR, let alone by a full 1mm. It's smaller than a 28mm S TR.