Rim brake carbon 50mm-60mm STIFF wheelset?

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

RedRacer
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:13 pm

by RedRacer

tomato wrote:
Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:18 am
Blackinc, Princeton, Hunt, Knight
The Black Inc Sixty looks interesting due to the unusual 24 spoke F/R build but they have internal nipples like the Enve (a negative for me) and I can't find any aero data or legitimate reviews.

Princeton is too ugly. Hunt and Knight look fine but are they ~$1000 less than the big brands due less tech and inferior materials/construction or because they are sold direct B2C?

I wonder how much stiffer my Roval CLX50s would be if rebuilt with spokes that are heavier than the DT Swiss Aerolite T-heads ?

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



tomato
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:37 pm

by tomato

RedRacer wrote:
Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:59 pm
tomato wrote:
Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:18 am
Blackinc, Princeton, Hunt, Knight
The Black Inc Sixty looks interesting due to the unusual 24 spoke F/R build but they have internal nipples like the Enve ...
I broke my first spoke in 30+ years this summer, and it was on a set of wheels that has internal nipples. It's no harder to replace the spoke -- the biggest obstacle is getting a replacement.

DHG01
Posts: 745
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 7:14 pm
Location: Madrid

by DHG01

Have you considered tubulars?
I know some fear then, but it's really not an issue - and will reduce weight considerably.

I find SES 4.5 very stiff on R45s; as said, tubular version is ~1320 grams.
As someone mentioned - DA are very stiff also (and wide). I ride C40, but at nearly 1.4 kg, a bit heavy. C60 would be even more so.
Bora s are known to be very stiff (rode them in the past); Ultras, at 1215 grams, are difficult to improve. They are not as wide as you might want.

RedRacer
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:13 pm

by RedRacer

DHG01 wrote:
Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:26 pm
Have you considered tubulars?
I know some fear then, but it's really not an issue - and will reduce weight considerably.
The weight saving from tubulars is appealing but I am stuck on clinchers with tubes and rim brakes. A seemingly rare combo these days!

At this point the Enve SES 5.6 is in the lead but which hubs will product the stiffest build?

DHG01
Posts: 745
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 7:14 pm
Location: Madrid

by DHG01

RedRacer wrote:
Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:06 pm
DHG01 wrote:
Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:26 pm
Have you considered tubulars?
I know some fear then, but it's really not an issue - and will reduce weight considerably.
The weight saving from tubulars is appealing but I am stuck on clinchers with tubes and rim brakes. A seemingly rare combo these days!

At this point the Enve SES 5.6 is in the lead but which hubs will product the stiffest build?
I couldn't really compare across hubs. But, as said, 4.5s with CK feel very stiff; 5.6 with the same hub should be more so.

BdaGhisallo
Posts: 3278
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm

by BdaGhisallo

RedRacer wrote:
Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:06 pm
DHG01 wrote:
Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:26 pm
Have you considered tubulars?
I know some fear then, but it's really not an issue - and will reduce weight considerably.
The weight saving from tubulars is appealing but I am stuck on clinchers with tubes and rim brakes. A seemingly rare combo these days!

At this point the Enve SES 5.6 is in the lead but which hubs will product the stiffest build?
I had a few pairs of Enve rims with various hubs - DT 240s and White T11 hubs - and I couldn't notice much difference in lateral stiffness at the rear between the two, despite the T11 hubs supposedly building into stiffer rear wheels because of their geometry.

What will make the biggest difference in lateral stiffness is the spoke you use. If you want lateral stiffness, go for thicker spokes. Stay away from cx-ray or aerolite spokes and go for a chunky spoke like Sapim Race. You won't add much in weight but you will notice a huge difference in lateral stiffness. The difference the thicker spokes make will dwarf the difference you get from different hubs.

User avatar
C36
Posts: 2492
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:24 am

by C36

In absolute numbers (rear wheels measures and skipped 1800+ g wheels)
- corima mcc Dx 46: 60N/mm (1370g pair)
- mavic CCU : 57 N/mm (1250g tubulars)
- corima mcc WS+: 52 N/mm (1450g)
- corima 47 WS dx: 51 N/mm (1670g)
- hyper 50: 49 N/mm (1284g)
- campa shamal carbon 2021: 49 (1600g)
- Lw std 3: 48 (1130g tubulars)
- campa bora wto 45 disc: 47 (1550)

Some I read in the comments, that are behind the leading group
- dt arc 1100 50: 45 (1490)
- Enve ses 4.5 ar: 45 (1600g)
- cadex 42: 44N/mm (1370g)
- roval rapid Clx: 43N/mm (1410g)
I somehow need to dig some bontrager data


Far behind we have
- all the zipps... I have almost 15 years of data and the only I recall being above the 40 were the 2009 404... recent models oscillate between a noodle 33N/mm (previous 303 fc) and 40.5 (353 naw)
- visions latest 55sl is at 40.8... but the front is even flexier (which is not normal)


Envoyé de mon iPad en utilisant Tapatalk

DHG01
Posts: 745
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 7:14 pm
Location: Madrid

by DHG01

Very interesting data. Thanks.
I am surprised to see the CCUs, which I also ride, above the Enve. Not sure if the non tubular configuration of the Enve is driving results or there a point beyond which additional stiffness is not as perceived. I would have never thought the CCU is significantly stiffer.

What is the source? Are more wheels available?

User avatar
C36
Posts: 2492
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:24 am

by C36

DHG01 wrote:Very interesting data. Thanks.
I am surprised to see the CCUs, which I also ride, above the Enve. Not sure if the non tubular configuration of the Enve is driving results or there a point beyond which additional stiffness is not as perceived. I would have never thought the CCU is significantly stiffer.

What is the source? Are more wheels available?
In terms of measurable performance there is a plateau at 60N/mm where you can’t see gains anymore (for road application).
Comparing the Enve / CCU, they play in totally different category, I have somewhere a 28 thick-spokes (at least cx-sprints) 55mm Enve rim and it just reach the 50N/mm.

RedRacer
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:13 pm

by RedRacer

C36 wrote:
Sat Nov 27, 2021 11:47 pm
In absolute numbers (rear wheels measures and skipped 1800+ g wheels)

- corima mcc WS+: 52 N/mm (1450g)
These look very interesting in terms of weight and stifness but the cost is high.

https://www.corima.com/road/mcc-47/cori ... ncher.html

Is there any aero data available?

Mocs123
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 9:19 pm

by Mocs123

Aren't the Winspace Hyper's supposed to be some of the stiffest wheels you can buy? They may have other flaws that knock them off your list, but I wouldn't discount them just because they are less expensive.
2015 Wilier Zero.7 Rim - 6.37kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg

User avatar
C36
Posts: 2492
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:24 am

by C36

Mocs123 wrote:Aren't the Winspace Hyper's supposed to be some of the stiffest wheels you can buy? They may have other flaws that knock them off your list, but I wouldn't discount them just because they are less expensive.
They are very stiff per today’s stds. With 50N/mm on the rear they are between 10 and 25% stiffer than most production wheels (40-45 range) but stiffer exist, look they examples I listed above.

Post Reply