NEW GP5000S TR

Wheels, Tires, Tubes, Tubeless, Tubs, Spokes, Hookless, Hubs, and more!

Moderator: robbosmans

Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.

If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12567
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

Hexsense wrote:
Thu Aug 11, 2022 7:20 pm
Depend on the testing set up.

Using very minimal sealant like on BRR: S-TR has pretty much the same rolling resistance.
Using usual amount of sealant: GP5000 latex is still a tiny (negigibly) faster.
TBH the fairest comparison would be to seal the tubeless tire and remove all extra liquid sealant. The liquid sealant is providing puncture/flat protection… something the latex inner tube doesn’t do.

User avatar
ultimobici
in the industry
Posts: 4463
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Trento, Italia
Contact:

by ultimobici

TobinHatesYou wrote: Veloflex tubeless are downright scary.
How so? Mine have been fine since day one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



raven14
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:27 pm

by raven14

Yup, I run the Veloflex Corsa Race TLR as well as Evo TLR on my bikes. I love them for their extraordinary grip and comfort level. Super easy to mount.

They both loose around 0.2 bar per day, which I find very acceptable. They do not sweat (I believe this is what TobinHatesYou is referring to) although they're very light (all of the ones I have, come within 10 grams of their advertized weight). A friend who also uses them says his tyres absorb some of the initial sealant on first installation, but this is not my experience (using regular Orange Seal).

I've not had a flat in around 5k km combined mileage, just 1 small superficial cut in the sidewall incurred on a gravel climb while bike packing in southern France last month. For sure a set will not last 5k km but their price is also lower than other premium TLR tyres.

I much prefer them to the GP5000S TR although they have tested a bit slower on BRR.

FlatlandClimber
Posts: 2491
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:37 pm

by FlatlandClimber

BRR just tested the tan STR and it's significantly slower. If that's real, that sucks.
Last edited by FlatlandClimber on Sat Aug 13, 2022 8:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cervelo P5 Disc (2021) 9.1kg
Factor Ostro Gravel (2023) 8.0kg
S-Works SL8 (2023) 6.3kg

*weights are race ready, size 58/L.
Sold: Venge, S5 Disc, Roubaix Team, Open WI.DE, Émonda, Shiv TT, Crux, Aethos, SL7

Jackofallgrades
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:15 am

by Jackofallgrades

To me it's highly likely it's down to Continental fiddling with the compound or manufacturing process since they last tested the black version last year, as we've seen quite a few differences in the pattern on the inside of the tyre...
Cannondale SSEvo3 'Atticus' - 7.2kg
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=161634

Cannondale Systemsix ’Dante’ - 7.7kg
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=167144

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12567
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

ultimobici wrote:
Fri Aug 12, 2022 7:03 am
TobinHatesYou wrote: Veloflex tubeless are downright scary.
How so? Mine have been fine since day one.

At least over here, the sidewalls get torn to shreds near the end of the tread cap. Additionally they don't have sufficient abrasion protection at the bead and some carbon rim hooks will shred the casing.

My Corsas looked ragged after 900km.

req110
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:23 am

by req110

I received 2x gp5k s TR 28 tanwall. One was 275 and other 285. The heavier one was more tight to install.
SW SL8 RTP 56cm @ 9270 / CLX II / CS OSPW / CEMA BB
S Epic 8 L @ XX T-Type / Berg Ratheberg 30 / Quarq / Fox Transfer SL 100mm / 3p

spdntrxi
Posts: 5838
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:11 pm

by spdntrxi

FlatlandClimber wrote:
Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:01 pm
BRR just tested the tan STR and it's significantly slower. If that's real, that sucks.
yes it does.. I'm riding them too.
2024 BMC TeamMachine R
2018 BMC TImeMachine Road
2002 Moots Compact-SL
2019 Parlee Z0XD - "classified"
2023 Pivot E-Vault

Mocs123
Posts: 870
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 9:19 pm

by Mocs123

Ditto - I just installed new tan wall STR's two weeks ago.... :(
2015 Wilier Zero.7 Rim - 6.37kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg

warthog101
Posts: 916
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:05 am

by warthog101

FlatlandClimber wrote:
Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:01 pm
BRR just tested the tan STR and it's significantly slower. If that's real, that sucks.
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.co ... ransparent

Puncture score and wet grip result is better though. 🤷‍♂️

User avatar
pdlpsher1
Posts: 4037
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:09 pm
Location: CO

by pdlpsher1

FlatlandClimber wrote:
Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:01 pm
BRR just tested the tan STR and it's significantly slower. If that's real, that sucks.
I know this may not be financially feasible but a true scientific test involves testing more than just a single sample. I wouldn't take this seriously since Jarno tested a single black tire vs. a single tan tire.

req110
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:23 am

by req110

warthog101 wrote:
FlatlandClimber wrote:
Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:01 pm
BRR just tested the tan STR and it's significantly slower. If that's real, that sucks.
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.co ... ransparent

Puncture score and wet grip result is better though. Image
Tan wall of latest generation loses 1-2W, but instantly getting it back on aerodynamics, because 28mm tire is around 2mm narrow than previous S TR which was almost 30mm on my wheels.
SW SL8 RTP 56cm @ 9270 / CLX II / CS OSPW / CEMA BB
S Epic 8 L @ XX T-Type / Berg Ratheberg 30 / Quarq / Fox Transfer SL 100mm / 3p

req110
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:23 am

by req110

Here are gp5k s TR after 4100km.
Front really good, rear not great, not terrible.

Image
SW SL8 RTP 56cm @ 9270 / CLX II / CS OSPW / CEMA BB
S Epic 8 L @ XX T-Type / Berg Ratheberg 30 / Quarq / Fox Transfer SL 100mm / 3p

Jackofallgrades
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:15 am

by Jackofallgrades

req110 wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:13 am
warthog101 wrote:
FlatlandClimber wrote:
Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:01 pm
BRR just tested the tan STR and it's significantly slower. If that's real, that sucks.
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.co ... ransparent

Puncture score and wet grip result is better though. Image
Tan wall of latest generation loses 1-2W, but instantly getting it back on aerodynamics, because 28mm tire is around 2mm narrow than previous S TR which was almost 30mm on my wheels.
Perhaps those 1-2w are actually just the extra RR you get from a wider tyre then?
Cannondale SSEvo3 'Atticus' - 7.2kg
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=161634

Cannondale Systemsix ’Dante’ - 7.7kg
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=167144

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



req110
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:23 am

by req110

No, New/slower are narrower.

Older/faster are wider

But difference is only about 1mm as per my latest measurement.
Last edited by req110 on Mon Aug 15, 2022 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SW SL8 RTP 56cm @ 9270 / CLX II / CS OSPW / CEMA BB
S Epic 8 L @ XX T-Type / Berg Ratheberg 30 / Quarq / Fox Transfer SL 100mm / 3p

Post Reply