Hambini, we had this argument before.hambini wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:37 pmI don't think there is anywhere else in the world where a forum would argue that an object that is wider (and has a bigger frontal area) would be more aerodynamic than a narrow one.
:Rollseyes in disbelief.
You don't need a PHD in aerodynamics to see the marketing spin.
W.r.t. to your statement you're right. I don't have a phd in that and I can imagine that a wider frontal area has more drag. I'm just saying that even your test to hunt's wheels were not on one of these latest models. Not the parcours. Not the latest roval's. As you said, you test what people provides you.
The problem with these marketing claims is not having independent testing. It'll never be perfect and cover all scenarios (that's simple impossible) but it'd be a step up.
What I argue is that other companies (at least some) also have very good people working there, with knowledge in aerodynamics and all. And as a way of living, me, I don't entirely refute someone else's knowledge that easily. Actually, as a way of living, by default, I consider my knowledge or ability average which already makes me listen to the arguments of others and wonder if they saw someting i've missed.
It's so not personally that I've already asked for a borrowed vernier to measure my bb so i can put an order for one of your bb