Garmin hub speed sensor aerodynamics
Moderator: robbosmans
-
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:03 am
tried google but nothing much came out
imagine spending thousands of dollars on the most aero wheelset only to have the garmin speed sensor wrap around the wheel hub costing a few precious watts...
or am i thinking too much
imagine spending thousands of dollars on the most aero wheelset only to have the garmin speed sensor wrap around the wheel hub costing a few precious watts...
or am i thinking too much
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
You mean the speed sensor that wraps around the hub? I doubt that would make any difference. It's not like you are increasing your frontal area at all.
I'm no engineer but I suspect it would be close to nothing. The air going thru the spokes would have so much turbulance that it would not cause much drag.
I hate anything hanging on a bike and if I could get rid of any component, I would. That is why I use GPS also.
I hate anything hanging on a bike and if I could get rid of any component, I would. That is why I use GPS also.
I read once that it causes drag if its on front hub, therefore best put it on rear hub.
Whith or without is a huge difference in AVG, especially on mtb.
Whith or without is a huge difference in AVG, especially on mtb.
What?!! “Close to nothing”, isn’t nothing, and in aero speak that means it counts. Manufacturers are claiming their hubs are more aero etc so strapping a brick onto the center has got to negate whatever aeroness they’ve designed in by oh, about 100%. I kid of course, but you know there’s someone out there saying exactly that.Butcher wrote:I'm no engineer but I suspect it would be close to nothing.
But it’s ugly af. I much prefer magnet based sensors.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:07 pm
- Location: Zwaag Nederland
I removed the rubber housing and strap. Drilled a hole in the hook of the sensor and used a zip tie. As clean as it gets.
Sounds interesting. Any pics?marcelflash wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 6:31 pmI removed the rubber housing and strap. Drilled a hole in the hook of the sensor and used a zip tie. As clean as it gets.
I use the hub speed sensor too, because for some reason the Edge 520 GPS is not very accurate. If I compare the distance calculated by the GPS to the distance calculated with hub sensor (having correct wheel size), the difference may be in kms for each training ride.
Which is why you should never take any advice from someone named butcher on the internet.Calnago wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 6:02 pmWhat?!! “Close to nothing”, isn’t nothing, and in aero speak that means it counts. Manufacturers are claiming their hubs are more aero etc so strapping a brick onto the center has got to negate whatever aeroness they’ve designed in by oh, about 100%. I kid of course, but you know there’s someone out there saying exactly that.Butcher wrote:I'm no engineer but I suspect it would be close to nothing.
But it’s ugly af. I much prefer magnet based sensors.
@kervelo: Is your Edge set to "Smart Recording" by chance. If so, try setting it to 1 second recording and see if that improves the accuracy of your distance recorded using GPS only. Still, nothing beat a sensor calibrated to your exact wheel size, unaffected by environmental conditions such as tunnels, tree canopy in wooded areas, etc.kervelo wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:50 amI use the hub speed sensor too, because for some reason the Edge 520 GPS is not very accurate. If I compare the distance calculated by the GPS to the distance calculated with hub sensor (having correct wheel size), the difference may be in kms for each training ride.
And @Butcher, having a dinner party tonight... T-Bone or Ribeye?
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Is that because the wheel size you entered isn't actually equal to the circumference of your tire? I'd expect a greater error in tire size labeling than GPS tracking.kervelo wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:50 amI use the hub speed sensor too, because for some reason the Edge 520 GPS is not very accurate. If I compare the distance calculated by the GPS to the distance calculated with hub sensor (having correct wheel size), the difference may be in kms for each training ride.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com