Anyone tried the Fulcrum RACING QUATTRO CARBON clincher
Moderator: robbosmans
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
I've done about 600km on them, my general feelings are mirrored in the CyclingTips review. They're reliable, spin up ok but no free speed. They're a bit pricey as well but they look great. I've seen them on a lot of 2016 aero road bikes, so pretty sure they'll be on eBay soon enough.
The rim looks great, and being Campag/Fulcrum I'd trust it, but the sub Record level (i.e. non cup and cone) hubs aren't great. They are fine for commuting and tooling around and durable, but I've always felt they aren't as fast as the higher end stuff. Personally I'd still take Zondas over those Racing Quattros ...
Put those rims on the decent hub and keep it under E1100 and Fulcrum would have a winner
Put those rims on the decent hub and keep it under E1100 and Fulcrum would have a winner
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:53 am
- Contact:
In terms of price, these are £840 in the UK vs £1200 for Campy Bora One 35mms - are the latter worth paying the extra £360 for?
markgoldstein wrote:In terms of price, these are £840 in the UK vs £1200 for Campy Bora One 35mms - are the latter worth paying the extra £360 for?
Different rim depths
Different hubs.......
Different spoke configuration.
Different brake tracks....
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:53 am
- Contact:
Different, as in the Bora One's are better in all regards?
I haven't ridden the Fulcrums, but have Bora One 35s
I expect the Boras will be better in every regard other than obviously a fractionally less aero rim depth, though you are probably almost at the point where it is an unmeasurable difference, so doesn't matter
The Bora tubular rim is professional level equipment. Nothing on the Fulcrums is.
I expect the Boras will be better in every regard other than obviously a fractionally less aero rim depth, though you are probably almost at the point where it is an unmeasurable difference, so doesn't matter
The Bora tubular rim is professional level equipment. Nothing on the Fulcrums is.
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
bontie wrote:Sawyer, are you confusing with the Racing quattro 35?
These are a new carbon version and definitely not the deep rimmed version of Scirocco/racing 5 as the quattro35
Hi there - no, I'm talking about the Quattro Carbon Clincher. New 40mm carbon clincher. Re-read my post and you'll see it all makes perfect sense
Bora 35mm vs Fulcrum 40mm - slightly less aero, but better hubs in particular
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
The Fulcrums are a value driven wheelset. The pricing is aggressive for a full carbon clincher and to get the pricing this competitive they obviously needed to cut some things back. This wheel is seemingly on tier 3 behind Bora One and Bora Ultra but is by no means a slouch. I can guarantee no one on Bora 35s would be faster than someone on Fulcrum 40s and I would not hesitate the rock these proudly.
The Chorus of Campy perhaps.
The Chorus of Campy perhaps.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:53 am
- Contact:
Calpol wrote:I've ordered a set for my new build. They cost £750 after my British cycling discount at chain reaction. I think they will look awesome on my supersix evo hi mod.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Weird, that's exactly the buying process that I was considering!
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Calpol wrote:I've ordered a set for my new build. They cost £750 after my British cycling discount at chain reaction. I think they will look awesome on my supersix evo hi mod.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Where are the pictures of them?