Page 1 of 1

2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:09 pm
by digiadaamore
Hello everyone, i am going to be picking up a set of zondas soon, ive been planning to go with the new 2013 with the mega g3 lacing. But i have found a great deal on new 2012 zondas with the normal g3 lacing, has anyone compared these wheels? The mega g3 is supposed to be stiffer but i know the old model is very proven and often came in under weight to boot!

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:14 am
by ticou
Get the Mega's dude. You'll thank me later.

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:14 am
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:26 pm
by fdegrove
Hi,

Excuse my infinite ignorance but what exactly is the difference between the two?

TA, ;)

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:35 am
by istigatrice
Normal G3 vs Mega G3? I think the grouping of the spokes is more aggressive on the 2013 ones, meaning that they are closer together on the 2013 model. What this means in terms of performance, I have no clue

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:42 am
by Calnago
It's something to do with a larger flange, but I don't know what that is relative too as I'm not that familiar with the Zondas. I don't think it has anything to do with the grouping of the spokes or their spacing. That's the same as far as I know.

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:00 pm
by fdegrove

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:03 pm
by Geoff
My wife has an older pair of Erus, which are plenty stiff. I have recently received a pair of 2-way Shamal Ultras for my tubeless test. They have the 'Mega G3' hub design. As compared to the older design, the Mega G3 has a larger diameter drive-side flange. That would change the spoke length and geometry, effectively making a stiffer, stronger wheel.

The old wheel is pretty stiff. If you can find the old wheel much cheaper, I don't think you would feel a difference.

Incidentally, the Shamal feels a lot lighter...

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:03 pm
by ticou
At 3X the price they should be!

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:58 pm
by fdegrove
Hi,

The old wheel is pretty stiff. If you can find the old wheel much cheaper, I don't think you would feel a difference.


If the old wheels are the 2005 era Eurus then I can assure you that the difference in vertical stiffness is not subtle. Personally I prefer the old ones.

Ciao, ;)

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:36 pm
by sawyer
As a 2012 Zonda owner I would say it doesn't make much difference. If the 2013 were knock-out stiff we'd have heard all about it. 2012s are decently stiff and VFM. Ride nicer than shamals and eurus on all but the smoothest french silk.

Re: 2012 vs 2013 campy zondas

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:36 pm
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com