moots compact sl - now 13.8lbs

Who are you (no off-topic talk please)

Moderator: Moderator Team

User avatar
kgt
Posts: 6775
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Location: Athens, Greece

by kgt

very nice but... you MUST buy a time spirit seatpost
Attachments
spirit.jpg

by Weenie


mathi
Posts: 1276
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:03 pm
Location: uk

by mathi

Nice build , whats your thoughts on the time chain set ? i have been looking at it for while now . Merry Christmas .

bikeman71
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:07 am
Location: Pollock Pines, CA

by bikeman71

Nice. What size is the frame?

It is the standard geometry compact frame with the 55.5 cm top tube.



Nice build , whats your thoughts on the time chain set ? i have been looking at it for while now .

I have no complaints with the crank set. I just checked the bearing smoothness and it was perfect after about 1000 miles. I did check the chainring bolts and they were a bit loose which I think may be contributing to some of the failures we have been reading about on here. But overall a very light and stiff crankset.

thanks for all of the compliments and suggestions on the build. it has been a fun project. this set-up shows me that the UCI needs to rethink it's weight rules. This bike is so solid with a frame and fork that are not very light (compared to some of the stuff out there) and it comes in at 13.8 lbs with pedals. it's nice to have such a light bike that can be ridden every day.

here's a few more pictures.
Image
Image
Image

alienator
Posts: 1103
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:58 am
Location: Tucson

by alienator

bikeman71 wrote:It is the standard geometry compact frame with the 55.5 cm top tube.


I hate you small frame riding bastards: you guys get all the really light stuff. My Compact w/ 57cm TT (two sizes larger than yours) is at 15lbs.

bikeman71 wrote:I have no complaints with the crank set. I just checked the bearing smoothness and it was perfect after about 1000 miles. I did check the chainring bolts and they were a bit loose which I think may be contributing to some of the failures we have been reading about on here. But overall a very light and stiff crankset.

thanks for all of the compliments and suggestions on the build. it has been a fun project. this set-up shows me that the UCI needs to rethink it's weight rules. This bike is so solid with a frame and fork that are not very light (compared to some of the stuff out there) and it comes in at 13.8 lbs with pedals. it's nice to have such a light bike that can be ridden every day.


Given how so very little weight affects performance, the weight limit is rather arbitrary isn't it? Oh well: when was the last time you saw anyone in charge of anything use critical thought, logic, and even (careful, here comes some heresy) science to make a sensible decision?

User avatar
Boonen
Posts: 2436
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 7:33 am
Location: Europe

by Boonen

That's a gorgeous bike you got there bikeman :thumbup:
I love the pictures as well, very nice with those backgrounds!
I hope you will like the bike and the new wheels. :D

User avatar
Juanmoretime
Administrator
Posts: 7054
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Location: Urbana, Illinois

by Juanmoretime

Nice job! I really like what you have done with the build. Shimano or somebody really needs to come out with carbon lever blades for STI. I love the look of my Ergo carbon blades!
RESIDENT GRUMPY OLD MAN.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post