HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2003 11:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 4:15 am
Posts: 3236
Location: tucson
Pretty much everyone speaks very poorly of ADAs on this board, and I know the history/controversies with Lightweight, but has anyone here actually ridden ADAs? At some point someone talked about some german test of ADA vs Lightweight and concluded ADAs were crap, but I believe the magazine name and article title escaped them or something (I might be wrong) so they could only summarize what they said. I'm just kinda wondering. Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 12:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 9:38 pm
Posts: 25
I've never actually ridden them, but from the looks of the information on the websites, I'd say it was the other way around. That ADA's are the better make. But I don't know the history, so I might not be one to say anything. It just kind of looks like Ceers knows what he's doing, I mean they just got into that new facility, there are pictures of all the testing that the wheels go through... But maybe there's more to the story I don't know about.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 12:17 am 


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 9:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:49 pm
Posts: 7
Location: australia
i also think that going just by the website that ada's are better and not just the weight, strength wise ceramic bearings etc. i know a guy that had lightweights and sold them as they flexed so much that they rubbed on his brake pads. i'd love to here from someone who's ridden them


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 9:49 am
Posts: 947
Location: München
camel wrote:
i also think that going just by the website that ada's are better and not just the weight, strength wise ceramic bearings etc. i know a guy that had lightweights and sold them as they flexed so much that they rubbed on his brake pads. i'd love to here from someone who's ridden them

That person can't have ridden the lightweights personally.
I own a set of lightweights, it is impossible to have them rub on the brakepads unless you forgot to close the skewer, or either the frame or the wheels have been badly damaged.
(BTW, They seem to be ok for Cipo and Ullrich, both not the lightest in the peloton.. On the other hand, you could see Jalabert climbing with his rear brake opened - he uses ADA.)

My personal experience is, that LWs are at least as stiff laterally as my '2000 "shamal"-style Ventos (at about 3/5 of the weight).
Independent Tests show the same:

German magazine "tour" had lightweights among many others in a big test in Issue 7/2002.
the ONLY wheels that were stiffer than the LWs was a wheelset approx. double the weight, built in traditional way with 32 2.0/1.8/2.0 spokes and brass nipples. (see Nr. (4) below)
All the other lighter wheels (Tune etc.) were WAY weaker.

some figures from the test:
(V=front, H=rear, N/mm = lateral stiffness in Newton per mm)

(1)Lightweight:
V: 71,4 N/mm (505g)
H: 58,1 N/mm (756g)

(2)Tune Olympic
(Tune/Zipp 303, Bladed Spokes 2.0/1.0/2.2 v24 radial, h 28 2xcrossed)
V: 49,3 N/mm (491g)
H: 36,0 N/mm (604g)

(3) Tune/Mavic Open Pro/32 bladed Spokes 2.0/1.0/2.2 32 3x crossed)
V: 54,1 N/mm (676g)
H: 38,4 N/mm (781g)

(4) Ultegra/CXP33/32 round spokes 2.0/1.8 32 3xcrossed)
V: 84.3 N/mm (880g)
H: 59.4 N/mm (1090g)

The test of the ADAs mentioned above was also in "Tour" this year.
they were considerably WEAKER than the Lightweights (between 10 and 20 N/mm, if memory serves).
The wheels tested were Edward Zimmerman's personal set, who is a close friend of ADA's Cees Beers.

Martin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 2:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 2:45 pm
Posts: 891
Location: Germany
martin wrote:
The test of the ADAs mentioned above was also in "Tour" this year.
they were considerably WEAKER than the Lightweights (between 10 and 20 N/mm, if memory serves).
The wheels tested were Edward Zimmerman's personal set, who is a close friend of ADA's Cees Beers.

A while ago someone posted a translation of the ADA test.
Stiffness was 56 N/mm for the front and 38 N/mm for the rear:
Quote:
tour 7/2003, page 98
"DECEIVINGLY SIMILAR"
Lightweight or Ada? Both High-Tech-Wheelsets made from Carbon and Kevlar look deceivingly alike and are often reason to arguments among experts: Which pro is on which wheels? A reason for the similarity may be that the dutch ada-owner Cees beers used to be sales partner of Munich manuafacturer lightweight. He copied the successful wheel for large parts, technically it is no match for the original. Stiffness is 38 N/mm for the rear and 56 N/mm for the front wheel. The Ada-Wheels also don`t score concerning aerodynamics. Compared to the carbon blades of the lightweight the bulky Kevlar spokes cause much more drag. But the Ada are lighter: wheelset is 1160 gramms, front 20-spoke 525 g and rear 20-spoke 635 g. This makes the Ada set about 100 g lighter than the Lightweights in the "tour" test 7/02. The weight advantage is credited mainly to the rear hub, an original construction and compatible with shimano as well as campagnolo. Two allen keys are enough to change casette and rotor. During the test ride the less stiffness of the rear wheel was noticable through rubbing on the brake pads when pedalling uphill standing up. Furthermore the rear hub made a noticable crack when starting to pedal after freewheeling. The manufacturer explained this with unprecisely manufactured ratchets in the freewheel of the tested wheel; totaly inacceptable when you look at the pricetag of 2950 Euros for one wheelset.
The wheelsets are only manufactured to order, they are available in 26 " and 28 " for road and track. The spoke number is variable depending on rider weight and use. Only available through direct order plus 70 Euros shipping (in europe). delivery time: at least 2 weeks.


There was also a test by a British magazine, but I can't find it anymore on the web.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 9:49 am
Posts: 947
Location: München
Florian, thanks for the article. Some details in there that i forgot, for example the noisy freehub. So much about "strengthwise better". LWs use Campy Record or Shimano Dura Ace; never heard anybody complain about the durability of these. And there are aftermarket ceramic BB for these available, if you vant to save a few grams on the wheel and many bucks in your wallet...

Martin

Florian wrote:
martin wrote:
The test of the ADAs mentioned above was also in "Tour" this year.
they were considerably WEAKER than the Lightweights (between 10 and 20 N/mm, if memory serves).
The wheels tested were Edward Zimmerman's personal set, who is a close friend of ADA's Cees Beers.

A while ago someone posted a translation of the ADA test.
Stiffness was 56 N/mm for the front and 38 N/mm for the rear:
Quote:
tour 7/2003, page 98
"DECEIVINGLY SIMILAR"
Lightweight or Ada? Both High-Tech-Wheelsets made from Carbon and Kevlar look deceivingly alike and are often reason to arguments among experts: Which pro is on which wheels? A reason for the similarity may be that the dutch ada-owner Cees beers used to be sales partner of Munich manuafacturer lightweight. He copied the successful wheel for large parts, technically it is no match for the original. Stiffness is 38 N/mm for the rear and 56 N/mm for the front wheel. The Ada-Wheels also don`t score concerning aerodynamics. Compared to the carbon blades of the lightweight the bulky Kevlar spokes cause much more drag. But the Ada are lighter: wheelset is 1160 gramms, front 20-spoke 525 g and rear 20-spoke 635 g. This makes the Ada set about 100 g lighter than the Lightweights in the "tour" test 7/02. The weight advantage is credited mainly to the rear hub, an original construction and compatible with shimano as well as campagnolo. Two allen keys are enough to change casette and rotor. During the test ride the less stiffness of the rear wheel was noticable through rubbing on the brake pads when pedalling uphill standing up. Furthermore the rear hub made a noticable crack when starting to pedal after freewheeling. The manufacturer explained this with unprecisely manufactured ratchets in the freewheel of the tested wheel; totaly inacceptable when you look at the pricetag of 2950 Euros for one wheelset.
The wheelsets are only manufactured to order, they are available in 26 " and 28 " for road and track. The spoke number is variable depending on rider weight and use. Only available through direct order plus 70 Euros shipping (in europe). delivery time: at least 2 weeks.


There was also a test by a British magazine, but I can't find it anymore on the web.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ADA Wheels
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am
Posts: 4321
Location: Canada
Ask me in a couple of weeks. I have a set on the way and will be able to let you know...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 3:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 4:15 am
Posts: 3236
Location: tucson
a set of Lightweights or a set of ADA's?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2003 7:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am
Posts: 4321
Location: Canada
ADA's. I looked into the Lightweights, too. There is a guy in the UK who has a set that is available right now (20-spoke road, Campagnolo), if you are interested. I'm using a set of Ambrosio X-Carbos with FRM front and Record rear hubs and Sapim CX-Rays as climbing wheels now. THe ADA's should be a lot lighter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 5:56 pm
Posts: 97
How much is the guy selling them for?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2003 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 4:15 am
Posts: 3236
Location: tucson
yeah, I'm interested in that as well, let me know if you know the guy and I'll drop him an email.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 2:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 4:15 am
Posts: 3236
Location: tucson
bump, plus do these wheels ever come up on European ebay?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 2:11 am 


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am
Posts: 4321
Location: Canada
Sorry, I have not been on in awhile. The person to speak to is Natalie Rogers at Peloton: peloton@ndirect.co.uk.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], LEC135, maquisard, MSNbot Media, tweets and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Top 5 frames you have ever ridden

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

in Road

53x12

63

7783

Tue Oct 15, 2013 1:42 pm

KB View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Anyone Ridden the 2014 BMC SLR02?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

LoggingMiles

16

4521

Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:50 am

Amarov View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2014 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX - ridden? reviewed?

in Road

rynogee

0

537

Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:24 am

rynogee View the latest post


It is currently Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:43 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB