HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 1:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:41 pm
Posts: 18
Hi, a couple of questions which I could find no definative answers for. I'm trying to build a rigid RC200 that's as light as possible but don't want to sacrifice too much useability and braking performance. Some issues;

- How much does a RC200 F8 frame weigh please? I haven't managed to find this anywhere (including the listings here).

- Is it possible for a front & rear disc set up to weigh as little as V-brakes? (or at least close to)

- I'm gonna run a single chain ring with a lightweight cassette. Will a Dura Ace 11-21 cassette and rear mech fit onto a Hope MTB freewheel and work with XT shifters? (Dura Ace mechs are incompatible?) Or am I better off forking out for a Ti XTR cass. and XTR mech?

- And finally!!! Has anyone got a pair of RC31 Ti yet? are they still the Dogs or is there a light(er), sexier fork that will go well with a F8?

Many thanks to anyone who can help!

_________________
The Bear


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 1:32 am 


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 2:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 3:27 pm
Posts: 1487
Location: Wales, UK
Hello!

You may find my recent post useful.
It's based on a RC300, and fairly light. My 16.5" weighed close to the Pace spec, perhaps the RC200 has a manufacter spec?

As far as disk brakes go, the lightest possible would be around 250g each, but they wouldnt be reliable. I have my hope mono minis to 318g and 100% reliable (ie. steel rotors).

Any 9sp cassette will work on a 9sp freehub, weather it 11-21 or 11-34.. But I dont think 11-21 is adviceable off-road!!

The RC-31Ti should be a very good fork, and availible very soon!
I dont think there is a sexier rigid fork availible tbh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:41 pm
Posts: 18
Thanks, your RC300's looking nice. Unfortunately Pace no longer list RC200 (or even RC300) specs on their website so I'll have to do some research. Was suprised not to find it listed here though, are they that rare?

I was thinking of going with mono mini rear and M4 front. I prefer Hope and it's only a small weight difference between the mono and M4 for extra performance (and looks!)

TBH I plan to use it more for road riding, hence the 11-21 idea. I have an older 'classic' RC200 set up for off road. This won't ever be as light as the F8 so I decided to keep it as my off road bike. Here's a pic of the F8 before I change a few bits.

Thanks for the info


Attachments:
DSC00130.JPG
DSC00130.JPG [ 125.57 KiB | Viewed 1331 times ]

_________________
The Bear
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 7:59 pm
Posts: 577
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
The Bear wrote:
I was thinking of going with mono mini rear and M4 front. I prefer Hope and it's only a small weight difference between the mono and M4 for extra performance (and looks!)

TBH I plan to use it more for road riding, hence the 11-21 idea.


If you plan to use it for roadriding, I don't think there is the slightest idea in using a 180 mm rotor. The M4 was designed for Freeride. I would just go for the Mini in the rear as well.

_________________
Think, type, speak... In that order...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:56 pm
Posts: 1280
Location: Worcester, UK
Yep I agree - if it's only for roadriding, and your roadriding only needs a single ring and an 11-21, then you very definitely don't need an M4. Extra weight for no real performance advantage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:41 pm
Posts: 18
Cheers for the input!

The only reason I thought about using an M4 front was because of my experience with the C2's on my bike. I have lost count of the number of times they have overheated and left me with no brakes (sometimes the rear too!). Obviously this doesn't happen during normal riding, only while coming down hills or after reguler heavy use do they overheat without fail. I have changed the fluid and pads but it makes no difference. Maybe this is just a trait of the earlier calipers and I doubt I'll be doing many steep descents after the rebuild but I'm just a bit paranoid.

_________________
The Bear


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 8:04 pm
Posts: 393
Location: a point or extent in space
The Bear wrote:
How much does a RC200 F8 frame weigh please? I haven't managed to find this anywhere (including the listings here)

The RC200 F8 weighed about 200g more than the RC300 from memory.

The Bear wrote:
And finally!!! Has anyone got a pair of RC31 Ti yet? are they still the Dogs or is there a light(er), sexier fork that will go well with a F8?

Nothing will look sexier than a Pace fork on a Pace frame ;)

_________________
Middle ring all the way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:31 pm
Posts: 24
Location: auckland, NZ
I'm sure I've got the details of the RC200 somewhere - it'll be the weekend before I can have a look to see though.

I run an RC200 F8 with hope XC4's on it & an RC36EVO III - it's luverly if a little long in the tooth now... :)

_________________
Pace RC200 F8 ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:16 am
Posts: 30
The Bear wrote:
Thanks, your RC300's looking nice. Unfortunately Pace no longer list RC200 (or even RC300) specs on their website so I'll have to do some research. Was suprised not to find it listed here though, are they that rare?

I was thinking of going with mono mini rear and M4 front. I prefer Hope and it's only a small weight difference between the mono and M4 for extra performance (and looks!)

TBH I plan to use it more for road riding, hence the 11-21 idea. I have an older 'classic' RC200 set up for off road. This won't ever be as light as the F8 so I decided to keep it as my off road bike. Here's a pic of the F8 before I change a few bits.

Thanks for the info



Robin, "Holly square tubing, Batman!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:31 pm
Posts: 24
Location: auckland, NZ
Knew I had it somewhere...

This is for the F8

SPECIFICATION
Weight 1775g (16.5in). 1845g (18in). excluding CrudCatcher
Material Pace 7000 series aluminium
Tubeset Pace load dedicated, externally butted
Colour Polished aluminium
Dropouts 7075-T6 aluminium detachable
Seatpost clamp Aluminium detachable
Seatpost diameter 29.4mm
Front mechanism Bottom pull 31.8mm
BB shell width 68mm
Headset diameter 28.6mm
Discbrake fitment Options ISO standard disc with
V- brake mounts or ISO std disc only

Cheers,
A

_________________
Pace RC200 F8 ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:07 am 


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:41 pm
Posts: 18
Fade2grey, thanks for the details. I haven't logged on for ages so my apologies for not seeing your reply.

The Bear

_________________
The Bear


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. building my new titanium bike

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

darthFrog

19

2321

Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:16 am

NiFTY View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. building my colnago c40 saronni

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

gotgame

10

2247

Sat Jun 14, 2014 10:22 am

kgt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. The Building of a S-Works Crux Disc

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

bfno

22

2782

Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:16 am

bfno View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Building up an old Kona Kula Supreme

in MTB

ednino

4

474

Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:40 pm

scotty View the latest post


It is currently Wed Nov 26, 2014 1:49 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB