Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:17 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 2291
Location: Pedal Square
So the consensus in the archives here seems to be that crank length is mostly a "getting used to" issue, and one should use what feels best. Which would be 175mm for me.

Now the thing is, I have a spare 172.5mm crank around, and am tempted to put it on a "hack" MTB, to ride once or twice a week (with 3-4 road sessions). Do people think the constant switching between lengths will be detrimental to riding?

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Top
   
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:21 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 10:47 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Posts: 6785
Location: Urbana, Illinois
I change all thine. Starting from shortest to longest: Fixie = 165mm, tt bike = 170mm, road bike = 172.5mm and 29er single speed 175mm. All work and no issues going in-between.

_________________
RESIDENT GRUMPY OLD MAN.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 1611
Location: Welland, Ontario
I too have "several" (ahem) bikes with crank lengths ranging from 175 through 177.5 to 180. I switch around all the time. No problem.

_________________
There's sometimes a buggy.
How many drivers does a buggy have?

One.

So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 7:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:38 pm
Posts: 371
I ride from 172.5 on my track bike, 177.5 road and TT and 180 MTB.
I don't know how much of what I feel is psychological but the 177.5 on the road just feels right, I have tried switching around from 175-180 on road and always end back at 177.5.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 8233
Location: Geelong
I review a fair few bikes. A lot come with 172.5

I personally use 175.

It's fine. I can feel the difference, but it's certainly not hampering me in any way.

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am
Posts: 4767
Location: Canada
Everyone is different. I personally cannot do it. If I ride 170's, I feel like I am going to hurl. The 175's are better, but still not 'right'. You'll have to try it and see.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:24 am
Posts: 599
170s are my crank length of preference, and I run it on all of my bikes now. However I used to have 165s on my winter bike and whilst it felt different, I got on fine with it.

But, given that I didn't swap regularly between the two bikes (I used to ride the winter bike for a long time and then swap to my nice bike and ride that through the nice season), I'd say that I wouldn't have liked to swap regularly between them. It takes me a while to get used to a new set up until I feel powerful and smooth.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm
Posts: 201
My question is similar to OP's. I'd like to try smaller cranks on my bike. I am riding 172.5 but I am not very tall and it has been brought to my attention that short cranks may help me. 167.5 seems ideal. I'm not exactly rich and I don't see any way to test ride cranks. Is it possible to even see a performance difference on cranks 2.5mm or 5mm different? Not just "I feel it's big/small" but "my pedal stroke is better/worse because of the size difference."


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 9:18 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Posts: 6785
Location: Urbana, Illinois
You may get a performance benefit but in many cases in just feels right which makes it worth the change too.

_________________
RESIDENT GRUMPY OLD MAN.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:37 pm
Posts: 75
I run 165 on track, 167.5 on crit bike, and 170 on training bike.

Generally, the higher the constant rpm, the smaller the cranklength I run. But the other advantage is that 165's on track are good for velodromes to avoid pedal striking at low speed, 167.5 is good for crits because you have a few mill extra than most riders before striking a pedal, and 170's teach you how to spin circles well :)

Really, it's not much different a feel, and if it was a blind test, I doubt I'd be able to tell you what is on the bike without looking, so it's probably more mental than anything.

Ride what you feel most comfortable with. Given most road bike are 172.5 to start, try a size up and size down from 172.5, and see if your body responds well to the change.

Cheers,
metal


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:58 am
Posts: 430
170 track, 175 road, 180 ss. I rock strike pretty regularly on the mtb which leaves me tempted to use a 175 in the hope that it might make a difference, but other than that i feel no detrimental effects.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 2585
metal wrote:
...But the other advantage is that 165's on track are good for velodromes to avoid pedal striking at low speed,


Probably an outlier, but there was one track World Champ who used to ride 200mm cranks on the boards with no issues... though he didn't go very slow. Just sayin'

My road and TT bikes are both 172.5, mtb 175 and 172.5, track 170 and 175.

_________________
"Physiology is all just propaganda and lies... all waiting to be disproven by the next study."
"I'm not a real doctor; But I am a real worm; I am an actual worm." - TMBG


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 2:12 pm 
Offline
Resident master of GIF

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:44 am
Posts: 2769
metal wrote:
But the other advantage is that 165's on track are good for velodromes to avoid pedal striking at low speed


not so much with the bank i'd think, but if you are riding on the street 165 is better than 175 when it comes to pedal strike

also on that note, toe overlap is reduced slightly especially with some of the steep angles for heatubes and close(r) clearances.

when i used to own track bikes, thankfully despite the small frames, i didn't have any overlap with 165 cranks and medium mks cages (street shoes). That's a plus when doing wycked fixie track stands at teh red lightz

_________________
Nate ★ Life , my tumblr joint
Instagramz


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:36 am
Posts: 1236
Location: UK
dvincere wrote:
My question is similar to OP's. I'd like to try smaller cranks on my bike. I am riding 172.5 but I am not very tall and it has been brought to my attention that short cranks may help me.

As has been mentioned you need to try them to see how they feel. I notice small changes in my setup, saddle too high / low etc but when I tried 175s (from 172.5s) I felt I had a little more leverage and it didn't adversely affect my cadence so I stuck with them.

A few months ago I picked up a cheap Campag UT 175 chainset for my winter bike so I've got the same size across the board.

dvincere, see if you can pick up a cheap 170 chainset on the Bay just to experiment with.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 875
Different crank length changes the knee angle. Make sure you adjust the fit accordingly.


Top
   
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:43 am 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stem lengths and frame

in Cyclocross / Gravel / Touring

Carlin

3

410

Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:26 pm

Carlin View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Campagnolo 11 Speed RD Cage Lengths

in Road

Valbrona

2

240

Sun Aug 21, 2016 5:06 pm

Valbrona View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Oval Concepts 520 crank vs 5750 crank weights?

in Road

kkapdolee

0

591

Thu Dec 17, 2015 8:18 pm

kkapdolee View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Factor Bikes

in Road

zappafile123

4

472

Mon May 09, 2016 12:33 pm

zappafile123 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Vintage Bikes

in Cycle Chat

Bely

6

642

Mon May 23, 2016 10:38 pm

bura View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited