HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 172
Short version: why does the RPE depend on the bike I'm riding even if the same total amount of work is used?

Longer version: I'm riding up a hill (4-6% grade, total time about 14-15 minutes) with a specific amount of power (let's say 220W average). On one day I use a heavy (steel) bike (10kg), on another day I use a lighter (carbon) bike (7kg); both bikes have the same setup wrt my position on them. Obviously it's faster going uphill with the lighter bike. However, the RPE for the heavier bike is also noticeably higher than for the lighter bike.

Why is that? Is it just psychological?
Some possible reasons I came up with are:
- just because I know that the carbon bike is faster?
- because I'm actually riding a bit faster?
- because the carbon bike provides a "smoother" ride?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:38 pm
Posts: 243
I would think more related to position and stressing muscles differently.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:46 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 172
The position on both bikes is the same ("both bikes have the same setup wrt my position on them"), so this shouldn't be the cause for the different RPE.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 3:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:37 pm
Posts: 71
What power measuring device is used on each bike? srm/quarq/powertap?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 172
Polar powermeter (old type) on the steel bike; SRM on the carbon bike.

The power measurements are close to those calculated for the grade, speed, and weight (assuming no wind). Moreover, the average power measured for the steel bike is usually even a bit lower than the one for the carbon bike.

The components (both Campagnolo Chorus) are another difference (besides weight) between the bikes: 10 speed with standard crank for the steel bike, 11 speed with compact crank for the carbon bike. However, the average cadence is about the same (around 100).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 2342
Throwing a dart on a board full of random numbers would give as accurate a reading as the Polar. If you're trying to compare RPE on different bikes you need accuracy. The Polar has been proven again and again to be worse than the iBike for estimating power.

_________________
"Physiology is all just propaganda and lies... all waiting to be disproven by the next study."
"I'm not a real doctor; But I am a real worm; I am an actual worm." - TMBG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 172
As I wrote: I checked the numbers provided by the Polar powermeter against those that can be calculated. They are within 5% of each. I also validated the data by comparing the differences in the time going up that climb -- these also match the expected values.

There are several other reports that the Polar powermeter is pretty good provided you install it correctly. It doesn't "estimate" power, it measures it. Anyway, I'm sure that this is not the source of the difference in RPEs.
But it seems nobody else has this kind of experience...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7474
Location: San Francisco, CA
You need accurate chain mass and, IIRC, avoid extreme chain angles.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk 2

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:15 pm
Posts: 1220
Location: Hungary
If it takes longer to climb the same hill, it's more work. (if the power output is the same.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:53 pm
Posts: 49
To give a data point:
I have a short local hill that I rode twice within 3 weeks on the same bike, different setup. 1/2 mile, 10% grade. First time was with my 52/36 chainrings and 12-26 OG-1070 cassette, second time was with 50/34 lighter chainrings and 11-28 OG-1090 Cassette. Time was 3:00 for both, avg HR was 177 for both, estimated average power was 286w first time, 284w second time. Looking at my cadence, with the first setup, I downshifted earlier and my cadence gradually decreased. Second time, I held a higher cadence longer, then had an extra gear to shift down and held that steady for the rest of the way.

Same bike, same watts, same speed, different RPE.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:42 am
Posts: 19
Location: Tahoe, NV
I have a huge problem on the trainer. It seems like maintaining the same wattage (same Powertap wheel, so that variable is covered) is much harder than just going outside and doing it. It's maddening, especially since there is no good explanation. Part of me wants to disbelieve my own RPE, but it happens so often that I have just started to accept a ~20w loss on the trainer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:04 pm
Posts: 54
ave wrote:
If it takes longer to climb the same hill, it's more work. (if the power output is the same.)


There you go


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 172
ave wrote:
If it takes longer to climb the same hill, it's more work. (if the power output is the same.)


Yes, but the RPE is already higher during the climb, not just at the end.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:44 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 172
Do you use a huge fan to cool you down when you ride inside? If not, that's the most obvious explanation. AFAIR there are some other discussions about this topic that try to explain the difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Watts per KG and gravity question!

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Training

TomUK

15

2452

Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:54 pm

bm0p700f View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. here is my bikes

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

greenplay

19

2167

Thu Oct 31, 2013 5:38 pm

greenplay View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. My bikes.

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

gummibear

2

938

Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:42 am

myndog View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. First Post and my Bikes

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

Ebruner

7

1222

Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:09 pm

KB View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help me decide between these two bikes

in MTB

mattcooke

9

2112

Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:34 am

bigben99 View the latest post


It is currently Fri Aug 22, 2014 11:38 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB