HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:57 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1965
Location: NoVA/DC
That brings up an idea- we should take a poll of weightweenies to see how their position stacks up, including bike type and saddle model. I'd be interested to know the spread.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:57 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 1743
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
I will start:

Height = 183 cm
Inseam = 86 cm
Saddle height = 76.5 cm
Setback = 10 cm (Specialized Romin saddle)
Tip of saddle to center of handlebar = 56 cm
Saddle to handlebar drop = 5 cm

Bike is a custom job with a 56.5 cm TT, 18.5 cm HT (~21.5 with headset cups), 72.5 deg STA, 73 deg HTA.

I am told I have long femurs, for what it is worth.

I had a spreadsheet with lots of data similar to above from another bike forum at one point, but I seem to have lost it. I wouldn't mind myself to see the spread and work on another one.

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1227
Location: In the industry
Notice everyone in the 172cm-173cm range claim to be 175cm. So the height numbers are not very accurate.

For example, Cav is supposedly 175cm and Lance 178cm. We know they are not one inch apart.

fa63 wrote:
I have been tabulating saddle height of pros (and a couple other things) for a while now; here is the summary:....

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1227
Location: In the industry
It has been said that:

Cervelo fit = bad fit.



MagnusH wrote:
djconnel wrote:
If you wanted to build a bike which fit the cyclists the best, you'd use a 66 degree STA and offset the seat tube forward by 94 mm relative to the BB.

Wouldn't this mean this mean a decreased STA (measured relative to the BB) for higher saddle-heights?
And isn't that opposed to the Cervelo fit that dictates equal STA irrespective of rider size?

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:19 am
Posts: 820
This was interesting to me so I figured I'd give it a go. I went home last night and tweaked the bike a bit.

I'm 180cm tall... and I don't know my inseam off-hand. I'm averagely proportioned though.


The position I'd been running on my Felt was
735-740mm saddle height
~90mm setback
56cm reach
54cm stack (and this is up for the winter)


The biggest surprise to me with the averages from this thread is that I'd basically need to move my whole position forward 2cm. I'm curious how this might benefit me (I haven't paid for a good fit yet which is why I'm willing to experiment and learn).

I raised my saddle 1cm and moved it forward 2cm... unfortunately I'm running a Ritchey C260 stem though so I can't swap it out without unwrapping my bars - so it will have to wait a couple of weeks. I'm already planning on swapping my 44cm bars our for 42cm and will play with 110-120mm stems at that point as well.

That leaves my current measurements at:
75cm saddle height
69mm setback
545mm reach

Which felt surprisingly ok during my brief roller spin that followed. I'm very eager to get narrower bars and finish things up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: San Francisco, CA
I put that Aegis up against my plot, scaling the bike to get a 2.1 meter wheel circumference:

Image

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:37 pm
Posts: 793
Location: Island of Cardiac Misfits
fa63 wrote:
I will start:

Apparently I have a saddle height of a 189cm rider - so it's hard to base things simply with height when leg length/torso ratio is not always a linear relationship.
Height = 181 cm
Inseam = 88 cm
Saddle height = 82 cm
Setback = 7.5 - 8 cm
Tip of saddle to center of handlebar = 57.5 cm
Handlebar Stack Height = 57.5 cm
Saddle to handlebar drop = 14.5 cm

A little shocking to see my setback is actually average. I've gotten many comments over the years about not having enough setback. I suppose visually, riding with a zero-setback post w/ rails neutral or slightly forward seems that way if you don't factor in the seat height.

_________________
My Addict SL : 5235g
My Addict RC: 5490g
My Cycling Blog


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3784
Location: Bay Area
1.865M
79CM seat height
87mm setback
12cm drop to top of bars next to clamp. I ride Rotundos, so about 13-13.5cm to the grips
Inseam= 34 inches.
Reach to bars= 59.5CM

Any higher on the seat and I get lower back tightness, but who knows if its in the right place or not.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:20 am
Posts: 1348
167.5cm
70.5cm seat height
5.5cm setback
6cm drop
29.5" inseam
51.5cm Saddle to bar

_________________
"Step forward the climber and all those who worship at the altar of lightness" - R. Millar


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:53 am
Posts: 181
elviento wrote:
It has been said that:

Cervelo fit = bad fit.



I tend to agree, but Canyon Ultimate CF SLX and the Ridley Helium SL (some sizes) are adopting similar seat tube angles to Cervelo!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:22 pm
Posts: 204
Location: Les Pays Bas
1870 mm total body length
910 / 920 mm inseam
820 mm saddle height
95 mm setback
605 mm tip of the saddle - bar
105 mm drop


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 865
Location: London
AGW wrote:
Interesting! The only pro that rides more setback than me, as a % of my height, is Tom Boonen. :lol:

Height: 1.75m
Cycling inseam: 81.82cm
Upper leg: 58.42cm
Lower leg: 53.34cm
Saddle height from BB c-t: 73cm
Setback (SMP Evo): 9.7cm

What can I say? I guess I can't average myself to a pro without the rest of their stats. According to my chart, I'd have to move my saddle forward 2.4cm. I'd be doing pushups on my handlebars with that kind of weight distribution.


I would suggest that you actually ride with *more* setback than TB. The SMP saddles position you much further back on the saddle than most, meaning you have to run with much less setback that you would on most perches.

_________________
Snacking on carrot sticks - Where did it all go so wrong?
-
Finsbury Park CC


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HammerTime2, jbf, mattythemod, rwatt and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Bicycle frame analysis on FEA

in Road

An1MuS

11

1060

Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:22 pm

An1MuS View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. data analysis after an upgrade

in Training

project3

5

887

Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:01 pm

Krull View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Favorite post-ride analysis program?

in Training

53x12

13

1297

Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:27 pm

eric View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. WTB: 27,2 mm alu seatpost, zero setback

in Wanted

klingej

0

18

Tue Sep 02, 2014 11:49 am

klingej View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 31.6 Road Seatpost with setback

in Road

boots2000

12

857

Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:26 pm

petepeterson View the latest post


It is currently Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:06 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB