HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27754 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059 ... 1851  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
Posts: 900
Location: South Carolina
KWalker wrote:
ultyguy wrote:
For all the crap that they get, are they really that bad of a bike? Surely the Speed Concept is a pretty quick TT bike as plenty of other teams use it under guise. And the Madone can't be so awful can it? I think the new brake system is crap, but then again, it just won MSR, can't be that bad.

disclaimer: I have never owned nor currently own anything Trek.


Every single person I know that has a 2010 or newer Trek seems to love it be it the new Madone, Speed Concept, etc. The brand gets a lot of shit in the US for being the go-to brand for newer riders and thus its not exclusive, but the top end models are still awesome bikes. The only reason I got a Super Six was because a Madone with a 7900 or better groupset was just too much cash- I would have rather tried a H1 7 series honestly.


I can put my two cents in, but only in the fact that I was racing a TREK for two seasons, same bike both seasons, and it was not the high end Madone, the 5 series. I hated it. I got wins, but I always felt like it was not stiff enough. Teammate had a 6 series top of the line and when we gave the bikes back, he went back to his GIANT from a previous team. He called and ask me if the GIANT was really supposed to be that much better of a bike?? I, like KWalker, went to Cannondale this season, but not carbon, I went to aluminum. One because I had raced on it before with great results, and two, for the price.

HUMP

_________________
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:30 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Posts: 7412
Location: Los Angeles / Glendale, California
Just gotta clarify something: the bike did not win MSR, a rider did.
That said, the bike did not hamper his performance.

_________________
Exp001 || TeamLACBC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:20 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Denmark
prendrefeu wrote:
Just gotta clarify something: the bike did not win MSR, a rider did.
That said, the bike did not hamper his performance.


:thumbup:
Trek still have Cancellera on the front page of their website.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am
Posts: 912
Location: Asti, ITALIA
micky wrote:
Rodrego Hernandez wrote:
They'll use what they like. Shimano don't have that much input!

Trek are the front runner as bike sponsor if Pinarello don't renew next season.


Trek? Really?



here's maybe why

Radioshack will stop the sponsorship at the end of 2013
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report- ... ponsorship


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:17 pm
Posts: 326
Since the talk of Pinarello's contract ending I've thought Sky on Trek made the most sense, especially now Cavendish is gone and outside of Cancellara RSNT's prospects don't look too good. There's also rumors that Radioshack will be ending their sponsorship. Trek have the money, and aside from Sky already winning so much they now have Boswell and Dombrowski which I'm sure the Trek marketing department would love.

If it does happen it would be interesting to see if they keep the Pro components and Shimano wheels or switch to Bontrager.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am
Posts: 912
Location: Asti, ITALIA
Pharmstrong wrote:
Since the talk of Pinarello's contract ending I've thought Sky on Trek made the most sense, especially now Cavendish is gone and outside of Cancellara RSNT's prospects don't look too good. There's also rumors that Radioshack will be ending their sponsorship. Trek have the money, and aside from Sky already winning so much they now have Boswell and Dombrowski which I'm sure the Trek marketing department would love.

If it does happen it would be interesting to see if they keep the Pro components and Shimano wheels or switch to Bontrager.



very well said, useful thinking :thumbup:

surely they will not ditch the Shimano Di2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:35 pm
Posts: 1480
Location: Geneva
Absolutely nothing wrong with having Cancellara on the front page of the website, it's just that they could get a 2 for 1 with this shot :lol: Madone and Domane in one!
Image

I just find the Trek hate a bit OTT sometimes, I reckon their most recent 6.9 SSL's are probably pretty amazing bikes all things considered, they're more than just marketing money. As for the Speed Concept, I'd be willing to bet it's one of the 1-3 fastest TT bikes out there, and at any rate, at this point, they're all starting to look the same w/ all the UCI limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:21 am
Posts: 266
I've tried several different brands over the last few years and Trek was one of the big disapointments. I rode a 2012 6.2 for a few months and really didn't like it.

1) The paint was easily scuffed and the decals were ruined as a result. I wasn't the first person I know to see this happen.

2) The frames felt dead. There was no road feel to it. It felt like my tires were flat. I've experienced this with a few other brands, but Trek and Focus seemed to be some of the worst for it.

3) It wasn't all the stiff. The front end and BB felt like noodles compared to a Cervelo R3/5 or a Tarmac SL3/4.

They are decent bikes, but I won't be riding one of their road bikes unless they do something incredible. Their MTB's on the other hand are pretty well done - paint aside.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am
Posts: 912
Location: Asti, ITALIA
special fork for the R3 Cervelo for the cobbles

https://twitter.com/krederRaymond/statu ... 05/photo/1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:13 am
Posts: 837
Location: Utah
prendrefeu wrote:
Just gotta clarify something: the bike did not win MSR, a rider did.
That said, the bike did not hamper his performance.


Same could be said about Aero frames too. :mrgreen: :D (which ever side of the fence you sit on, in regards to aero benifits)

Not trying to go OT or start down that road.

Just thought is was funny.

prendrefeu, I totally agree with you.


Last edited by carbon2329 on Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Posts: 5020
Location: New York
I've yet to hear of a pro rider complain that their equipment is sub par and hampers their performance.
Even when they are not on the team they work for.
It's either bad luck, a mechanical (which happens from time to time), bad decisions, bad timing, or no legs.
If the bike works without any mechanical it's never the bike.
Mind you they have trained on this bike since the beginning of the season and all the issues will be sorted out in training not during their target race.

_________________
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
Posts: 900
Location: South Carolina
Ghost234 wrote:
I've tried several different brands over the last few years and Trek was one of the big disapointments. I rode a 2012 6.2 for a few months and really didn't like it.

1) The paint was easily scuffed and the decals were ruined as a result. I wasn't the first person I know to see this happen.

2) The frames felt dead. There was no road feel to it. It felt like my tires were flat. I've experienced this with a few other brands, but Trek and Focus seemed to be some of the worst for it.

3) It wasn't all the stiff. The front end and BB felt like noodles compared to a Cervelo R3/5 or a Tarmac SL3/4.

They are decent bikes, but I won't be riding one of their road bikes unless they do something incredible. Their MTB's on the other hand are pretty well done - paint aside.


This pretty much sums up what I was feeling as well.

HUMP

_________________
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
Posts: 900
Location: South Carolina
stella-azzurra wrote:
I've yet to hear of a pro rider complain that their equipment is sub par and hampers their performance.
Even when they are not on the team they work for.
It's either bad luck, a mechanical (which happens from time to time), bad decisions, bad timing, or no legs.
If the bike works without any mechanical it's never the bike.
Mind you they have trained on this bike since the beginning of the season and all the issues will be sorted out in training not during their target race.


We also all know that the bikes of the pros are sometimes made with a different carbon layup than what "We" can ride. That was stated about Specialized a long time ago.

HUMP

_________________
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:21 am
Posts: 266
pastronef wrote:
special fork for the R3 Cervelo for the cobbles

https://twitter.com/krederRaymond/statu ... 05/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Pretty sure that is the same as previous years. For cobbles, Cervelo goes to the R3 mud, a slightly modified R3. It has a fork with more clearance, a little longer wheelbase and a rear triangle with more clearance.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:28 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 864
Location: Hamar, Norway
Kjetil wrote:
Was Ciolek on Veloflex Criterium or Roubaix?
Finally a proper picture. My vote goes to Roubaix:

Image

Pic via micky.

_________________
Bianchi-Campagnolo


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27754 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059 ... 1851  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], euan, Google [Bot], stestu101 and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling Technology

in Road

YinYang

4

976

Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:12 pm

coloclimber View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling in Burlingame

in Cycle Chat

KH1

6

149

Tue Oct 21, 2014 5:59 am

Dalai View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Youth Cycling

in Cycle Chat

xnavalav8r

4

559

Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:02 pm

xnavalav8r View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling News

in Cycle Chat

airwise

8

761

Sat Dec 21, 2013 1:31 am

djm View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling news app

in Cycle Chat

tinchy

3

417

Tue Dec 31, 2013 1:39 am

btompkins0112 View the latest post


It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:17 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB