Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Thu Sep 29, 2016 1:04 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 292 posts ]  Go to page Previous 113 14 15 16 1720 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:13 am
Posts: 852
Location: Utah
prendrefeu wrote:
They each have their nuances that determine whether aero will be of paramount* importance.

Where * paramount meaning that aero is the be-all-and-end-all priority above weight, comfort, handling, etc:.


:goodpost:

I think this sums it up perfectly.

The reality of the situations is that with all that goes into riding/racing, the benifits are VERY SMALL at best, and possibly ZERO or WORSE, when including watts burned with being uncomfortable or fighting any side winds etc...

Just a thought :D


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:04 pm
Posts: 100
@Prendrefeu-Fair enough, you can show me that a non aero equipped individual can beat an aero equipped individual. Also, you can say that there are different horses for different course. However, my point is quite simple and it doesn't need to be taken so far out of context. For ME I change my opinion about the benefit of aero depending if I race or don't. Really doesn't matter what kind of racing because I do TTs, RR, and Crits. I leave the longer stuff and Tris for others. And to be clear I do think there is a benefit even though some choose not to. But, I don't need that benefit once I decide I am merely out to enjoy myself.

So, you're a yes for a racer that doesn't place as high a value on aero but still believes it does give some benefit. That is all I wanted to hear.


Top
   
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:18 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:31 pm 
Offline
Tubbie Guru

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 2:20 am
Posts: 5850
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
I am simply trying to gather if that is the line of thinking that is driving the position that aero is lower on the scale of importance than anything else. That is all; nothing more.


Aero frame is lower, yes. Not aero in general.
I can see your point but OTOH in the majority of the races 95% of all riders would not even be able to benefit from their aero frame. They spend most of the time sheltered in the belly of the pack anyway.

Maybe we should all start doing races on TT bikes as well. :lol:

Ciao, ;)

_________________
Being a snob is an expensive hobby.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:04 pm
Posts: 100
Quote:
Maybe we should all start doing races on TT bikes as well.
If I thought it was advantageous then I would. ;)


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Posts: 8335
Location: Los Angeles / Glendale, California
I believe that 'racing' itself it too variable in too many ways to give anyone a general answer of "this will make you win". Afterall, even within a specific type of racing - say criteriums - one route is different from another.

Related: Last year (and I believe still to this day), there's a gentleman out here in SoCal who does an entire series of Crits on a singlespeed setup. Yet, despite not having the range of gears to flip through, he definitely dominates the podiums and series totals. Now, based on one person's performance in a particular route, which week by week is the same location, same direction, same roads, is everyone advised to go with singlespeed setups? No, they are not. When it comes to other crits he uses a fully geared setup. When it comes to circuits, a different bike entirely, and so on and so forth.

Why?
Fitness trumps all. Equipment is for the specificity of event, and further specific to that individual rider's needs. That is all.

_________________
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:04 pm
Posts: 100
Really? I have to train to be successful? I can't just buy speed? Your anecdotal examples are just that, and I am not sure why you keep bringing them up.

But I guess i'll counter with one of mine since this seems like what you want to hear. Mr. Euro Pro, I am sure we don't need to be dropping names? Well he races when he has time around here in the 1/2 field and in one particular race, a crit, he got handled. Not because he wasn't fit, or choose his equipment poorly, or the course didn't suit him (because it did), but because he was alone and the other kids had teams. See it is not all about one thing, not even fitness.

But that is not my point. My point is that I was trying to come to grips with why there was this major position that I couldn't fathom and then I thought about if I didn't race would my position change. So, I wanted to know if that was the reason for a majority of others. Therefore, a yes or no answer is all I was looking for, as a 'no' jives with my thinking and a 'yes' means it doesn't. I don't need the justifications for your positions as you and others have splattered it all over this and other threads but the missing piece was if you raced. I hope that is clear and if not then I guess i'll just move on.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 5584
Location: Athens, Greece
Stalkan, if you feel better, faster, stronger, calmer, more secure, etc. etc. by counting every single aspect of your body, training, bike, diet, equipment etc. etc. no one will tell you not to. But I guess this is more of a psychological obsession and nothin more or less.

_________________
My 6696gr Cipollini Bond
My 8618gr Colnago Master X-light


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:49 am
Posts: 2182
Location: Denmark
I race. I have both an aero bike and a "normal" bike set up very much alike. I use the "normal" bike 85% of the time. Only on very specific courses I choose the Aero bike. Why? Because I much prefer the handling, stiffness and lower weight of the normal bike. I'm also sure that these qualities are outshining any little aero gain the other bike has most of the time.
I think your concept only has merit if the almost all aero frames wasn't penalized by this. And yes. I have tried most on the market. But the frames that on paper has most aero benefits to offer, is generally also those with the least impressive numbers in other regards. There's no free lunch. (yet, at least)


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 875
Lets say that you suck at racing (as I do), and you cannot put down enough power to notice the stiffness, are too terrible a bike handler to notice the handling, and either have a heavy enough road bike or have zero body weight already to justify the 300 gram frame weight increase. Then does aero make sense?
Basically do aero frames only help pros or only help Freds?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:05 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:32 pm
Posts: 152
There is a thread with this same title "Is lighter/better bike really FASTER?" with only two posts, which is apparently locked. Just curious, why might this thread be locked?

As an engineer and a weight weenie who is very interested in going faster, I was looking forward to the other forum members' replies.

_________________
Damon Rinard
Engineering Manager, Road Bikes
Cycling Sports Group, Cannondale
Ex-Kestrel, ex-Velomax, ex-Trek, ex-Cervelo


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:24 am
Posts: 599
EDIT: Thread merged. My post looks silly now, but good job mods.


Last edited by CarpetFibre on Mon Jul 29, 2013 6:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 936
Location: it's raining, it must be uk
well, assuming bikes are for racing, by definition a 'better' bike will be faster

other factors being equal, a lighter bike will be faster uphill and slower downhill, but as aerodynamic drag increases with the square of speed, there's more time to be gained going up than down, so lighter is best

badum tish, thread can now be locked


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 3447
Unless you crash coming down the other side...

_________________
C59 Five Years Later
My Special Colnago EPQ
Trek Emonda SL


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 936
Location: it's raining, it must be uk
i refer you to my previous post: "other factors being equal"


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 5584
Location: Athens, Greece
It depends...

_________________
My 6696gr Cipollini Bond
My 8618gr Colnago Master X-light


Top
   
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 8:18 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 292 posts ]  Go to page Previous 113 14 15 16 1720 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. aero handlebars vs aero wheels vs aero frame

in Road

spectastic

7

1798

Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:34 pm

RyanH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. new bike obsession, aero quality of non-aero frames (Super S

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

tacostand

17

3181

Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:37 am

justkeepedaling View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Question to the aero gurus - "non aero" frame vs Cervelo S5 frame / fork / seatpost

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 ]

in Road

mbrider

61

3240

Tue Sep 27, 2016 3:45 pm

fa63 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Nike Wing Sunglasses....$1200 to be more aero and look even faster!!!

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

mile2424

19

1799

Sat Aug 27, 2016 12:31 am

AJS914 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero+ Caliper Brakes VS Non Aero + Disc Brake Road Bikes

in Road

Jmdesignz2

11

2165

Mon Sep 19, 2016 4:08 am

spdntrxi View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Bogan, CBRE, eajohnson, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], ihs0yz, Yahoo [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited