A spokesman for Armstrong said SCA had already settled its dispute with Armstrong in 2006, agreeing to pay $7.5 million and signing an agreement with Armstrong and Tailwind Sports Inc., the company that managed his former team. The spokesman provided The Wall Street Journal with a copy of the 2006 agreement, which says “no party may challenge, appeal or attempt to set aside the arbitration award.”

First he is stripped of 7 TdF titles.

Now the question is, should Armstrong be stripped of his more than 150 Strava KOMs?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-05/armstrong-maintains-strava-presence-as-cyclists-seek-online-ban.html

Lance Armstrong, the world’s most prominent confessed doping cheat, competed on closely held Strava Inc.’s website until yesterday, based on recent updates to his Strava profile. He held more than 150 running-course records and King of the Mountain cycling rankings (known as KOMs) before they disappeared from his Strava page yesterday.

San Francisco-based Strava, which advertised on broadcasts of last year’s Tour de France, treats Armstrong as “just another member of the community,” says Chief Executive Officer Michael Horvath. Some Strava competitors urged banning Armstrong because of his doping.

Here is an update. I don't know who was responsible for the disappearance.

The basis of Armstrong's SCA Promotions case defense?

Can untruthful (fraudulent, perjurious, lying, whatever you want to call it) testimony negate such an agreement?

What's fascinating is that he really WASN'T the best doper ever. If he was, he would have made better efforts at keeping all this under wraps. He assumed too much. Even the best warriors sometimes underestimate their adversaries.