Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:52 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:09 pm
Posts: 48
So both these companies do a carbon clincher at around the same price now in the wide 23mm rim width.
I think i want to get a set.

I am guessing the only difference really lies in the hubs. does anyone know much about either of these wheel sets?
which is better? stiffer? better braking? i know Boyd is now available in 11sp hub but that doesn't really impact me.

http://2013.bikesoul.com/c6-0/

http://www.boydcycling.com/products/60mm-clincher.html

1610g Soul
1660g Boyd


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:51 pm
Posts: 124
The rims are different too despite their similar weight and depth. The soul looks like a firecrest knockoff, while the boyd is less blunt and has more of a super toroidal shape. I listened to a zipp presentation at training camp when these were first released and I remember Josh saying that even slight variations in the firecrest shape produced wheels that were slower than previous versions at most yaw angles. So I'd personally be leery of anything just made to look like a firecrest rim, and I know Boyd did actual wind tunnel testing.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:30 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:35 am
Posts: 113
Location: Singapore
Our SOULs are narrower by 0.5mm at brake track, deeper by 2mm, lighter by 50g, wider bracing angle hubset, BOTH untested in wind tunnels, the rest will be conjecture.... Our hubsets are also available now for 11speed.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:52 am
Posts: 819
not tested in the windtunnel :roll:

Soulbike, explain why your wheels are so expensive then.

november cycles new rail have been, weight less in theory and cheaper to boot...

Rim Weight: 475g - 495g (targeted)
Wheelset Weight: 1525g (targeted)
Price: $1285. Pre-order $1145 (limited availability for pre-order)

http://www.novemberbicycles.com/rail/

_________________
Current Rides:

2014 Trek 7.9 PO Sram E-Tap
2016 Emonda ALR Team Issue 9000 DA


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 815
Probably because every other non-open mold carbon wheelset is expensive? Comparing next years product pricing to last years product is a ludicrous effort.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:09 pm
Posts: 48
Interesting point about variations to the firecrest shape. This (unfortunately) doesn't make things any easier considering neither have been wind tested.

One observation (pure aesthetic) from pics is that the carbon pattern is different. The Soul's throwing a more marble effect and the Boyd a more plain black carbon.

It would be good to hear someone chime in on the Boyd hubs.. sounds like the soul hubs are pretty solid from doing a search.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:53 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner / Manufacturer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:48 am
Posts: 104
Location: Taiwan
So ZIPP says that anything that varies from their patented shape by even a fraction of a mm isn't worth the effort?

I wonder what NASA thinks?

_________________
BDop Cycling Co., Ltd.
www.bdopcycling.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:01 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:31 pm
Posts: 41
432r wrote:
Interesting point about variations to the firecrest shape. This (unfortunately) doesn't make things any easier considering neither have been wind tested.

One observation (pure aesthetic) from pics is that the carbon pattern is different. The Soul's throwing a more marble effect and the Boyd a more plain black carbon.

It would be good to hear someone chime in on the Boyd hubs.. sounds like the soul hubs are pretty solid from doing a search.


We have a 3k weave on all of our carbon wheels. I am in the process of having some very cool photos done for our website and catalogue.
As for the hubs, that is something we focused on the most with the new line. We used to use a very similar hub to the Soul wheels but moved away from the six pawl design as the pawls were kind of small and could stick. So we now have four oversized pawls for very solid engagement. We also moved the left bearing out on the axle for added stability and added a pre-load adjustment. The hubs are optimized for flange geometry based on whatever configuration you are using and we also focused on tension balance between drive and non-drive side. One of the biggest benefits is that we double cross the spokes on both sides of the rear wheel for a much better transfer of torque.
Here's a bit more info on our hubs:
http://www.boydcycling.com/hubs/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

_________________
http://www.boydcycling.com The Handcrafted Revolution


Last edited by coachboyd on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:03 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:31 pm
Posts: 41
BobDopolina wrote:
So ZIPP says that anything that varies from their patented shape by even a fraction of a mm isn't worth the effort?

I wonder what NASA thinks?


I know what they think about dimples.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/ae ... 0215.shtml

_________________
http://www.boydcycling.com The Handcrafted Revolution


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:28 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner / Manufacturer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:48 am
Posts: 104
Location: Taiwan
^^^Coles notes, please.

_________________
BDop Cycling Co., Ltd.
www.bdopcycling.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm
Posts: 201
Mechanical Engineer with substantial aerospace experience here including at JSC in Webster for NASA

The short of it? Dimples help flow, especially at a velocity high enough to be near transitional Reynolds numbers, remain attached to the surface of the object WHEN THE OBJECT IS BLUNT. Airfoils do not receive benefit from this and nor do lower Reynolds numbers. Most people would argue that rims are shaped like airfoils and therefore receive no benefit from dimples. Although, it is clear from the trend towards increasing rim widths that the primary cause of drag is due to flow separation and not skin friction, ergo dimples could theoretically help. One can surmise that increasing the width of the rim is actually a much better mechanism to achieve increased flow adhesion and it should be sufficient without dimples. I would not say dimples are simply of no benefit based on my knowledge in the field of fluid dynamics, however, this seems to be opposed to the opinion coachboyd has formed based on the material. Moreso it appears dimples are a poor substitution for a better shaped rim. Also to note, the best shaped rim for aerodynamics does not mean its the best for other purposes, such as handling, weight, strength, etc.

I've never done wind tunnel testing in my tunnels on bicycle parts under cycling conditions but I'd be very interested if someone could produce a paper showing typical Reynolds numbers rims are exposed to as it would clarify a lot of the marketing claims out there. Has anyone seen an attempt at demonstrating this?


EDIT: thinking about it more, I think the Reynolds numbers may be too low for dimples to help.


Last edited by dvincere on Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner / Manufacturer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:48 am
Posts: 104
Location: Taiwan
^^^ I'd like to see that data, too and even would invest some to facilitate.

Also, dimples are about THE RIM. What are the impacts on the WHEEL as a system? My guess is that it is equal to or less that spokes/ spoke count...and then there's the fork. And that pesky rider....


Data anyone?

_________________
BDop Cycling Co., Ltd.
www.bdopcycling.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:31 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:31 pm
Posts: 41
BobDopolina wrote:

Data anyone?


I am working on that right now. We are going to work on sending bike+rider+various wheels into the wind tunnel with the only variable changing being the wheels. We'll then plot the drag graphs based on that vs using just a wheel by itself.

_________________
http://www.boydcycling.com The Handcrafted Revolution


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm
Posts: 201
Coachboyd, I would absolutely fall head over heels in love with you if you could do tests with the same rims and hubs changing only spoke count and lacing configurations. It would be a dream come true if you could get them to estimate the Reynolds numbers of the flow over even one configuration.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:41 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner / Manufacturer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:48 am
Posts: 104
Location: Taiwan
I'd know I'd interested in data that was independent and supported by real world results as opposed to the absolute claims made in ad copy by many of the big players.

_________________
BDop Cycling Co., Ltd.
www.bdopcycling.com


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) HED Jet 6 plus vs Ritchey WCS Apex II Carbon 60mm

in Road

faken

11

1828

Wed Dec 30, 2015 6:45 am

gmakris View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Mavic cosmic pro carbon SL clincher

in Road

riochang

12

1377

Thu Apr 28, 2016 7:17 pm

Junior7 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Descending with carbon clincher still an issue?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

riochang

34

3188

Thu Mar 03, 2016 5:37 am

ktw7937 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. FLO launched 45mm, 60 and 90 carbon clincher

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

mpulsiv

59

2693

Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:30 pm

CrankAddictsRich View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Carbon Clincher Rim Brake Tracks NexGen - Experiences?

in Road

Beaver

6

291

Mon Jun 27, 2016 5:39 pm

Beaver View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jeffy, martinko, nemeseri, synthesis, WESTMOTORSPORTS, Yahoo [Bot] and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited