HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:36 pm
Posts: 110
Location: Denmark
Hi All :D

I have a titanium project going on and I am about to make the final decisions.

My choice of crankset will be XTR (but I don't know if I am riding Shimano in 3-4 years). That means that I actually do not need PF30 right now.

The question that I find hardest to answer is whether I should go for a BB30, PF30 or BSA bottom bracket.

I know that this question some time turns out to be a question about religion, but anyway....

Please help me out here - BB30, PF30 or BSA.

Ciao

ebsilon

_________________
Speed of Lite


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:55 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:14 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 1087
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Seeing as XTR cranks have a 24mm spindle you might as well go for normal BB threads as you will not get the full benefits of BB30 but you will possibly get the hassle of regular bearing replacements and creaks. To me BB30 and PF30 are not an advancement at all.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:52 pm
Posts: 7
is there not an option for PF92? that way you wouldnt get and creaks from the BB threads and they seem to last longer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:25 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 1087
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
You could use a BB92 cups but really whats wrong with BSA threads. They have worked fine for years. Go with BB92 if you worry about how stiff your cranks are. If you do worry about that then you really should find something else to worry about.

I suppose one deciding factor would be is a BB92 shell more expensive than a BSA shell.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:42 am
Posts: 272
PF30. So many options. Don't make a mistake by going with something else.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 366
Location: USA
My Form Prevail Ti 29er I got with a PF30 BB, and my latest Ti bike I was going to go that way also. But then I was convinced by the builder to go with BSA 73mm. I've heard all the arguments about this better than that... but what settled it for me was two things:
1) Ease of working on: if something is wrong with your PF30 BB, eg creaking, or binding, etc then good luck servicing it. You'll probably destroy the cups of the BB in trying to remove it (assuming it was loctited in place as it needs to be to not creak). With BSA its obviously very easy
2) Bearing stance: on the PF30 bike I have hollowgram cranks and the bearings are 73mm outside to outside. On the BSA bike I also have hollowgram cranks, installed with a Rotor BB and the bearings are 73mm inside to inside. That's a significant increase in bearing stance that should make the cranks stiffer and the bearings last longer.

To me the above outweighed any perceived benefits of the PF30 system.

_________________
Enjoying my Funk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:28 pm
Posts: 876
I had a Moots RSL with a PF30 bb. I must say that I did not love the PF30- too many issues with bearings, creaking, etc.
If I were to get another ti hardtail I would get a threaded bb and put a King bb in it- done.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:07 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:29 am
Posts: 1361
Location: Ontario, Canada
I think BB92 or BB386 would be idea. That way you can keep the BB as wide as possible so you can optimize the downtube and seatstays for stiffness. The weld area could be bigger as you can work the Ti tubes to have the right shape factor at the weld area.

BB30 is still a narrow bottom bracket shell. PF30 is the same.

BB92, or BB386 is where it starts really getting wider and get really optimized.

_________________
http://www.hackracer.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:37 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1951
Location: NoVA/DC
I've seen quite a few ti frames with downright awful bb shell tolerance issues. like over 1mm variance in shell width at different points, non-round pf30 bores with up to 0.5mm interference, etc. Larger spindles are less tolerant of misalignment than smaller ones. Some shops won't ream/face ti frames as they're hard on cutting tools, and most don't have the tools to do it to a nonthreaded frame.
whichever you choose, make sure they properly finish it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:29 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:29 am
Posts: 1361
Location: Ontario, Canada
for BB30 you have to do the boring of the bottom bracket post weld & heat treat (if you need heat treat for your particular metal).

PF30 relaxes the tolerances a bit and uses a cup to take up the tolerance required.

_________________
http://www.hackracer.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:11 pm
Posts: 84
What about BB86. It's the Shimano standard. It doesn't have the squeaking issue that BB30 has. It blows all the other standards away.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:26 pm
Posts: 540
Location: NoVA
This is the exact reason I'm on the fence about replacing my current MTB (Ti Litespeed Niota) most of the current ti offerings are all PF30 and after riding with a good friend on a Moots with a PF30 I don't want to deal with the non-stop creaking/squeeking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 366
Location: USA
At NAHBS I talked about this for a while with the builder from Mosaic. He was a proponent of using a BB30 shell (not PF30) with the Rotor BB adapter to 24mm cranks. He liked this because the Rotor BB cups thread together and pull the BB in tight... which prevents creaking he said and allows you to remove and service the BB with simple tools. Praxis make a similar BB I think for PF30 frames. Only downside is that they marry you to 24mm spindle cranks.

_________________
Enjoying my Funk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:12 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 1087
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
So what the point then you might as well have the cheaper convential BB thread and a normal BB.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:12 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 366
Location: USA
I tend to agree with you (see my earlier post). Mosaic seemed to think that the BB30 shell is a "nicer platform to build around". He felt like there were perceived stiffness payoffs with the frame. I'm skeptical myself, but I mention this in the context of people who are anxious about not having a choice by PF30, or who already have a PF30 frame.

_________________
Enjoying my Funk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. EPS Wiring and PF30

in Road

corky

2

436

Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:26 am

corky View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. THM PF30 bottom bracket

in For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13

cerro

0

178

Wed Jan 08, 2014 10:24 pm

cerro View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. S-Works crank for PF30

in Road

gregalfa

8

573

Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:01 am

bikerjulio View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. BB30/PF30 crank...

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

audiojan

17

1593

Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:49 am

AidanEdward View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Campagnolo Over Torque and BB30/PF30

in Road

beeatnik

6

872

Fri Dec 20, 2013 4:50 pm

uraqt View the latest post


It is currently Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:08 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB