HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1116 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 75  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:27 pm
Posts: 340
Location: Switzerland
Thanks Hubert, that's exactly what I wanted to know.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:49 am 
  • 14.90 € (including 19% VAT)
  • 60 components


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:42 pm
Posts: 5
Some photos on the scales of my new 9070 parts.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/63137071@N00/sets/72157632761178825/

Question: No BC-9000 brake cables included with the shifters, and I can't find them in the UK at all. What would you recommend to use for the initial build (and would it be worth switching once the 9000 cables are available)?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 1254
Yokozuna cables are a very worthy substitute. I haven't used the new Shimano cables yet, but I found the Yokozunas to be superior to any other brake or shifter cables that I have ever tried.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 7:11 pm
Posts: 296
Location: FL
Yokozuna are good but can be extra work to install depending on your config. The brake housing can be too big and needs some trimming. The length has to be perfect for some brakes too. Should be less sensitive with Dura-ace calipers though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 1254
I was thinking mostly of the cable itself and not the housing. I have never tried Yokozuna's fancy housing (Revolution, iirc). Their regular jet-lubed housing along with their stainless steel cables are magic. They were the only thing that made my 7900 shifting acceptable, back before I went with DI2.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 159
Here are two vids of 9070 shifting I took last night

Rear:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK_3o-LTQpI

Front:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hSJQuNhCVc

I also posted a bunch of screens on the firmware update process here:

http://alexvalentine.org/?p=6496


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:22 am
Posts: 5
SpeshK wrote:
dha wrote:
aaric wrote:
dha wrote:
My DA C50 clinchers arrived today. Look great, just holding out for better weather before I run them on the bike.


Can you stick them on a scale and post results?


Haven't got a scale unfortunately.


Mine have arrived too and I do have some scales. I'll post the results later.

828g for the front, 1003g for the rear out of the box. So 1831g for the set. Shimano stated weight for the set is 1672g so these are 9.5% over.

This set is gonna have to go back though. When rotating the front wheel, I can hear loose material rattling around the inside of the front rim. I managed to shake some out from the valve holes but can't get all of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:36 am
Posts: 71
Here are my WH-9000-C50 CLs

Image

note that i removed the stock rim tape and replaced them with a single layer of stan's yellow tape. Original weight is what's pictured + 10 grams per wheel.

Tried the yellow tape as a longshot experiment, worked out great!

(1 layer stan's tape = 5 grams per wheel ; Orig Shimano Tape = 15 grams each)

_________________
http://www.roadiemanila.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 282
so stock weights of 1740-1831g vs 1672g advertised.

Thanks, appreciate the weights. I was hoping they'd come out closer to advertised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:28 pm
Posts: 915
Anyone install a 9000 crankset with a King bb? Do I need the thin spacers that king provides? It seems to have play in it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:19 am
Posts: 645
Location: Brisbane, Oz
boots2000 wrote:
Anyone install a 9000 crankset with a King bb? Do I need the thin spacers that king provides? It seems to have play in it.

It shouldn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:15 pm
Posts: 1232
Location: Hungary
aaric wrote:
so stock weights of 1740-1831g vs 1672g advertised.


That's more like 1710g. Shimano advertises weight for the wheels sans tape. Yep, still overweight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 4:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:36 am
Posts: 71
at 1710, definitely not featherweights. but you do get an alloy brake track if it's any consolation.

(i find the 'disappearing spokes' cool too) :wink:

Image

_________________
http://www.roadiemanila.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:01 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner / Manufacturer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:48 am
Posts: 102
Location: Taiwan
ave wrote:
aaric wrote:
so stock weights of 1740-1831g vs 1672g advertised.


That's more like 1710g. Shimano advertises weight for the wheels sans tape. Yep, still overweight.


Once again Shimano demonstrates its inability to work carbon.

_________________
BDop Cycling Co., Ltd.
www.bdopcycling.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:57 pm 
Offline
Formerly known as wassertreter

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 1947
Location: Pedal Square
BobDopolina wrote:
Once again Shimano demonstrates its inability to work carbon.

Either that, or their commitment to put out rock solid products with ample safety margin, targeted at average Joe, who's not very interesting in weighing things.

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:57 pm 
  • 14.90 € (including 19% VAT)
  • 60 components


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1116 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 75  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Rodecki and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2012 SRAM Red vs. DA 9000

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

addictR1

20

2808

Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:49 pm

oreoboreo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura Ace 9000 changes to 9001

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

in Road

NYCPrynne

65

19553

Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:58 pm

Grill View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. DURA ACE 9000 OR ROTOR

in Road

treetrees

10

2649

Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:10 am

maquisard View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura Ace 9000 Chainring Sizes

in Road

JimmyRingo

12

1028

Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:29 pm

06SpiceRed View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura-Ace 9000 FD shifting pattern

in Road

wca9922

5

1032

Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:28 am

TheDarkInstall View the latest post


It is currently Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:32 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB