HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:08 pm
Posts: 335
So, I have decided on Zipps.

I have also decided on 404 Firecrests.

ENVE are nice but considerably more expensive.

Definitely a 404 in the rear. The question is, should I run a 404 or a 303 in the front?

The 303 is slightly lighter, more 'pro' looking (in combination with the depper 404 rear), and won't catch cross winds as badly. But the 404 is more aero, perhaps stiffer (?), and matches.

Any advice either way from those that have tried?


Last edited by solarider on Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:14 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:18 am
Posts: 197
how about the rear? 303 or 404? either 303 both and 404 both front and rear. 404 front and 303 rear doesnt make sense. I posted this question before.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:30 am
Posts: 626
Location: Simi Valley CA
Go 404 front and rear. I wouldn't sweat the 404 catching too much wind. I live in a town that can get very windy certain times of the year...its something that I learned to adjust to. My 404's are my only set of wheels.

Unless you live in a place that blows wind every day. :mrgreen:

_________________
eurperg wrote:
My wife is sitting next to me, and just thought that was a dildo, not a saddle.. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:16 pm
Posts: 370
Going down the Old Kent Road yesterday with 404 FC's and I damn near got blown onto the pavement from the outside lane.

High winds yesterday for sure, but it made me think about maybe getting a slightly lower profile wheel for when the wind blows.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 2:32 pm
Posts: 71
I'd match the Zipps – both 303s or 404s. The ENVEs are designed that way.

If you are trying to get a do-it-all wheelset, I'd go with 303s. They will excel in the wind and on the hills while offering some aero benefits. If you are specifically looking for a wheelset to ride more on the rolling stuff and offer even better aero characteristics, and you have something else to ride on very windy days and/or a lot of altitude, I'd go with the 404s. Having said that, you could probably get away with just 404s, even if they might not always be ideal.

Oh and: congrats! Enjoy them! 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am
Posts: 4316
Location: Canada
Or, do 404 front, 808 rear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:59 pm 
Offline
Formerly known as PezTech
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 5646
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Actually the ENVE's are designed not to match... The depths are staggered

3.4--6.7--


That said, to the op...

Go as deep as your cross wind issues allow. If you don't currently suffer cross winds a lot, just go deep/deep.

_________________
charles@pezcyclingnews.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3266
Location: Natovi Landing
solarider ... alas i don't have the sets you're considering.

I'd go 303 FC tubs if it were me. Almost as aero as 404 ... c100g lighter all in the rim IIRC ... wider ... and designed a bit more for comfort IIRC.

Plus you'll have a clear rationale for 808s.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 11:40 pm
Posts: 863
Location: Eire
It needs to be blowing an absolute storm for a 404 to feel sketchy in crosswinds, and probably then only for a light rider. 404s all round is probably the best way to go unless you particularly like the aesthetics of the 404/303 combination. Either will work great, however.

_________________
Not everything that counts can be counted. Not everything that can be counted counts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:24 am
Posts: 593
I agree - A 404 feels solid in crosswinds. I haven't tried the new Firecrest shape for which they claim even more crosswind stability, but the old shape was fine for me when it was blowing a hooley; I'm only 58kg and this was on a time trial bike...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 2:32 pm
Posts: 71
CharlesM wrote:
Actually the ENVE's are designed not to match... The depths are staggered


This is what I meant, ie the ENVE SS are designed not to match. Anyhow, carry on. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 5:02 pm
Posts: 113
I've got older 404s and they don't seem too bad in crosswinds.

If you have rolling terrain or roads that arent "great" the 404s are a pretty easy choice.

If your terrain is smooth and/or do rides with quick accelerations or steep hills. I'd go with the 303s. I have a set of 303s that I bought late last year but haven't used them yet because of Winter weather.

Right now with Shimano's spacing change you might be able to buy both of you don't mind "nearly new" vs new if you Ok staying with 10 speed. There are some deals out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3266
Location: Natovi Landing
The more important thing than crosswinds per se is whether you're going to be riding fast, competitively, in a group. It's then that handling becomes safety critical. 404s solo or with friends in a training ride is not going to be a problem I agree.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 24
Location: Denmark
^ I've ridden 404's for quite some time and havent had a problem with crosswinds at all. If you just keep your hands on the handlebar, especially in windy conditions you should be okay. Also at races its no big deal, just keep them hands on.

I dont know were you live, but if you do alot of climbing you will not feel the 100g or at least I wouldnt.

My choice 404 FC tubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:43 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], gospastic, MSNbot Media and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Sub-200g carbon bar - ZIPP SL still the best choice?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

RedRacer

21

2049

Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:41 pm

mgrennie View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 202 rear hub spacers

in Road

paradawt

14

1040

Sat Jun 08, 2013 11:08 am

paradawt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Front wheel for time trail (hed h3 or 9)

in Road

tri

10

497

Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:06 am

Juanmoretime View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 101 - uneven breaking in the rear, faulty surface?

in Road

pbateman

1

410

Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:02 pm

thisisatest View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rear wheel not centered in frame.......

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

bicicleta

17

1373

Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:09 pm

PoorCyclist View the latest post


It is currently Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:55 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB