Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:41 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5334
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
Wing nuts? This is more than 2 decades after Campagnolo started selling QR's.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:31 pm
Posts: 379
jekyll man wrote:
I think the 2 guys in the last pic will give as much of an answer as you're going to get on here ;-)

If you cant believe in what you think is right/wrong and what the shop is saying, try elsewhere..

i dont think pics on the turbo bear much resemblance to what happens out riding in regards to postion anyway, but i'm no expert


Yes I hear you, but I am so not a 56cm on paper its freaky.

Heart size 56, head says 54, wallet says different bike :shock:


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 11:42 pm
Posts: 3915
Location: lat 38.9677 lon 77.3366
I have a long torso with short legs. After decades of frustration I bit the bullet on a custom frame. Nothing is more important then fit for both perfomance and comfort. Save your coin until you can get a good fit. The picture you show is not a good fit IMO :beerchug:

_________________
WW Velocipedist Gargantuan


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7896
Location: San Francisco, CA
I knew a guy who went to the Merckx factory in Belgium and they had an old Chris Boardman frame: huge top tube to down tube delta, which they sold him off-the-rack.

The key issue here is we're used to pro teams where they squeeze the riders onto the standard range of geometries. As a result you end up seeing stuff like 16 cm stems in some cases. But if you compare different frame companies, as my plots show, you can find a range of fits. I'd look at Felt, for example.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 115
Location: Honolulu
Short legs often means sizing down for a shorter HT length, switching out cone spacers and ordering a "Slam Your Stem" dust cover.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:43 pm
Posts: 1943
diegogarcia wrote:
Given we ride with our legs, I am now thinking 54cm for efficient pedal stroke as although chain stay length the same, extra 2cm stand over on 56cm = higher seat stays in turn affecting the saddle height and kops.


I'm sorry, but what are you talking about here? Seat tube angle is identical between 54 and 56, so why would your saddle position be changed? What does chain stay length or seat stay height have to do with your pedal stroke?


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:31 pm
Posts: 379
wingguy wrote:
diegogarcia wrote:
Given we ride with our legs, I am now thinking 54cm for efficient pedal stroke as although chain stay length the same, extra 2cm stand over on 56cm = higher seat stays in turn affecting the saddle height and kops.


I'm sorry, but what are you talking about here? Seat tube angle is identical between 54 and 56, so why would your saddle position be changed? What does chain stay length or seat stay height have to do with your pedal stroke?


well the HT is taller, thus the top tube is taller, thus the seat stays are higher imo making the bike bigger at the back than a 54cm. Taller I would call it...?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:43 pm
Posts: 1943
So how's that going to change either your saddle height or setback relative to the BB?


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Short reach road frame

in Road

Martin.F

12

1400

Sun Feb 28, 2016 5:31 am

unagidon View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. carbon fork for short reach brakes and large tires

in Road

carhillclimb

5

399

Mon Nov 09, 2015 10:54 pm

carhillclimb View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Short reach tall head tube frame option.

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

abrown3mtg

37

1714

Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:10 pm

AZK View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Legs topic

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Training

Carlin

17

1592

Tue Mar 15, 2016 11:50 pm

motdoc View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. stack/reach

in Road

Poulidor

3

489

Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:59 pm

Valbrona View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited