Cannondale Evo Sizing?

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
Post Reply
2002SaecoReplica
Posts: 1944
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:02 pm
Location: Getting dropped

by 2002SaecoReplica

Getting a new Evo pretty soon and have some questions for the size guru's...

I'm currently on a XL/58cm Scott Addict with a 110mm Deda Zero100 stem and Deda Newton deep drop handlebars. I run 1 20mm spacer under the stem. Stack should be 400mm and reach should be 589mm.

When I switch to the Evo I'm going to switch to Ritchey classic drop bars so I'll lose some reach off of my bars so I'd go up to a 120mm stem? I'm thinking I'd be a 58cm Evo? Stack and reach are 577mm and 399mm respectively. So I'd need another spacer under the stem to get the same drop? Should I go up to a 60cm? Stack and reach are 596mm and 402mm respectively for the 60cm?
- Zipp rims will break if you look at them too hard
- R-Sys wheels will spontaneously explode
- The ZG crankset will never, ever exist
- Everyone needs Lightweights, even if they're fat and old
- Parts actually made of metal are SO 10 years ago

Northoceanbeach
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:12 pm

by Northoceanbeach

I think they run big. I ride a 58 in most bikes but ride. 56 evo. It's something that might not apply to you but you should keep in mind. Especially since you are thinking about going up to a 60 you may likely stay a 58

by Weenie


CBRE
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 1:37 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

by CBRE

Big for sure, I'm 54 or 55 in most brands but with the Evo I'm 52 and very comfortable.
Curt Brown

2016 Cannondale EVO Etap 13.8#'s
2012 Cannondale Supersix EVO etap 13.7#'s
2017 Cannondale SUPER X Force 16.0#'s
2016 Cannondale FatCad2 28.1#'s
2011 Cannondale Carbon Flash 1 17.9#'s

nathanong87
Resident master of GIF
Posts: 3162
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:44 am
Contact:

by nathanong87

i dunno it's weird because i ride a 50cm caad10 and a 50cm caad10 with the lower headset bearing cap, is shorter stack and shorter reach.... the 52cm evo is probably what i'd ride if i were to buy one. So I think evos run a bit 'small' compared to even their own caad10.

size down on the frame. the evo comes with some 20-25mm dust cap cone thing too.

beeatnik
Posts: 297
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:26 pm

by beeatnik

Yep, stick with the same size or go down a size. Don't size up. I usually ride a 55-56. My EVO (54) feels longer than my Moots Compact Sl (56) and my CAAD10 (54).

topflightpro
Posts: 793
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:35 am

by topflightpro

I ride a 56 in Cannondale - IIRC, the geometry is pretty much the same for Evo, Caad 9/10, System 6, Super 6....

Last fall, I was looking at getting a Foil, and I was sort of stuck between a 54 and a 56. The TTs on Scotts are a bit longer than Cannondales. The 54 had a good TT length, but the HT was too short. The 56 TT was a bit long for me, though the HT worked.

That said, I am all legs. I have a very short torso. As a result, I need frames with decent size HTs compared to the TTs.

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

Don't pay attention to the labeled size number: that's basically arbitrary. Focus mostly on stack & reach:

Cannondale Evo geometry here.

savechief
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:36 am

by savechief

Here are some numbers for you based on this calculator (http://bb2stem.blogspot.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;). I assumed a 13mm headset top cap:

Option #1
58 Evo
120mm, -6 degree stem
30mm spacers under stem

With this setup, you would be within 1mm of you old setup from a stack perspective and the new setup would have ~6mm longer reach, which might then be negated by the shorter reach handlebars that you plan on using.

Option #2
60 Evo
120mm, -6 degree stem
10mm spacers under stem

With this setup, there is about a 1mm stack differential and the new setup would have about 1.5cm more reach than the previous setup. You know the reach difference between your old and new bars?

Option #3
60 Evo
120mm, -8 degree stem
15mm spacers under stem

This one is similar to #2, but you get within 1mm on the stack and you're just a bit over 1.4cm longer on the reach in the new setup.

Option #4
56 Evo
130mm, -6 degree stem
30mm spacers under stem

Even with 30mm of spacers under the stem, the new setup will be ~1.7cm lower in stack than the old setup. The reach of the new setup will be 1.1cm longer than the old setup.

If I were you, I would rule out buying a 56 Evo unless you plan to get much lower in the future. Find out the functional (not necessarily numerical) reach difference between the two bars and go from there. If you were happy with the 58 Addict, I would definitely go for the 58 Evo.
Last edited by savechief on Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Time VXRS Ulteam (7.16 kg)
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=120268

savechief
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:36 am

by savechief

savechief wrote:Sorry, messed up editing my previous post. Accidentally hit "quote" rather than "edit".
Time VXRS Ulteam (7.16 kg)
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=120268

2002SaecoReplica
Posts: 1944
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:02 pm
Location: Getting dropped

by 2002SaecoReplica

Per Ritcheys website the classic's have an 80mm reach. The newtons are 95mm reach.
- Zipp rims will break if you look at them too hard
- R-Sys wheels will spontaneously explode
- The ZG crankset will never, ever exist
- Everyone needs Lightweights, even if they're fat and old
- Parts actually made of metal are SO 10 years ago

by Weenie


Tokyo Drifter
Posts: 480
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:28 am

by Tokyo Drifter

Get off of the internet and go to a Cannondale dealer with a fitting stand. Geometry is essentially identical between evos and CAAD10s. Choice of handlebar will not impact what size bike you ride, rather, it will impact the length of stem you run.

Also, if fit is really a big concern for you, then you should be considering more than one frame. There is a large number of light weight frames available with a correspondingly wide range of geometries.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post