Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:17 pm
Posts: 21
here she is with demo zipp 303s


Attachments:
File comment: here she is with demo wheels
IMG_3081.JPG
IMG_3081.JPG [ 149.75 KiB | Viewed 519 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:17 pm
Posts: 21
the is the glossy black. you can see the carbon fiber detail under the paint. I did not get a weight for the frame - when I first saw it it already had SR EPS installed and after a couple of test rides I decided to leave that on instead of having Sram Red put on. An R5 VWD with SR EPS is supposed to be 11k when it comes out so it was a no brainer for me....
looks like the file is too big


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 8:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 8:01 pm
Posts: 3
First post so Hi to all, be gentle, I was searching for build weights for the fake 65.1 and found this to be font of info.
Not sure if Im allowed on the site for buying one so flame away.
Bought from mainland China, Aliexpress, Its the 1K finish, not the 3K, pretty sure its just a cosmetic layer. Finish needed a bit of cajoling to get bearings onto forks, I took it unpainted but they still sprayed the joints and exits, not a lot of care taken there some issues with paint over cable runs, all sorted in a couple of hours.
Frame 1185g
Forks 433g uncut
Most bars 110-440 388g
seat post 192g
Built up with DA9000
Selle gel flite
Pair of HED ardennes on at the moment clinchers with Conti 4000's
Two bottle cages
pedals 9000
Total 7200g
Comments appreciated ...........


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:17 pm
Posts: 55
Location: Ireland
I put together a fake 65.1 (It was in Pinarello colors, BOB, so I think thats less and thus lighter) for someone. Not sure of the size but it was small with an effective top tube of about 51cm. Weight for the frame and hardware was 1058, Seatpost was a porky 230g (slightly cut) and the fork was around 430g uncut.

Spun it around the block a few times.. rides well, exterior finish is nice... inside the frame is rough though.. wasn't impressed. Its the third one of these I have had my hands on in the last couple of years, the other two I see around and still seem to be going strong, so who knows, maybe they are alright ? Definitely not the same as the original's though which are much less rough inside from what I saw.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:50 am
Posts: 6
Dogma 65.1 is heavy weighted as compared with pro bikes. A frame weight greatly effects the performance of a rider during riding bikes/ cycles. Light weighted frame helps a rider to show at best level.

_________________
Hanging Scales


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 2829
Location: Athens, Greece
MARKSPENCER wrote:
Dogma 65.1 is heavy weighted as compared with pro bikes. A frame weight greatly effects the performance of a rider during riding bikes/ cycles.


I agree 8)

Image

Image

_________________
Wilier Cento Uno
Colnago Master X-light
Wilier 18carati


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 1:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: Natovi Landing
prendrefeu wrote:
It's quite funny what we're finding, actually.

About a decade ago, there were curmudgeons saying "Carbon will spontaneously explode!!!!!!!!1!!!". Look where we are now.
About a decade ago, there were curmudgeons saying "A carbon bike will never be as light as a Ti bike!". Look where we are now.
About a decade ago, there were curmudgeons saying "A carbon bike always be unaffordable". Look where we are now ($600 gets you light & reliable)

Now?
Curmudgeons saying "A light bike isn't reliable". Utter bullsh*t.
Curmudgeons saying "A light frame isn't stiff". Again, bullsh*t.
Curmudgeons saying "A heavier bike always has better handling." I think the bull is running out of feces.


+1 LOL.

I remember all that crap. Careful you don't accidentally breathe on your cf top tube now!

There were people saying Lance is innocent also.

Perhaps the same chaps!

They've all melted away to even more deviant corners of the internet :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:52 am
Posts: 114
That picture of Richie Porte is funny. Looks like he is just learning to ride with no hands :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 12:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:32 am
Posts: 238
Location: Adelaide, Australia
kgt wrote:
MARKSPENCER wrote:
Dogma 65.1 is heavy weighted as compared with pro bikes. A frame weight greatly effects the performance of a rider during riding bikes/ cycles.


I agree 8)

Image

Image


I'm pretty sure that these guys are all riding custom layups. I was speaking to one of the ex Radioshack riders and he seemed pretty sure that all of their frames were different to the off the shelf stuff

_________________
Apparently my bikes were talking the other day & are undecided whether to upgrade the current rider or get a new one...

one of the schemers...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 3:04 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 4548
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
sawyer wrote:
prendrefeu wrote:
It's quite funny what we're finding, actually.

About a decade ago, there were curmudgeons saying "Carbon will spontaneously explode!!!!!!!!1!!!". Look where we are now.
About a decade ago, there were curmudgeons saying "A carbon bike will never be as light as a Ti bike!". Look where we are now.
About a decade ago, there were curmudgeons saying "A carbon bike always be unaffordable". Look where we are now ($600 gets you light & reliable)

Now?
Curmudgeons saying "A light bike isn't reliable". Utter bullsh*t.
Curmudgeons saying "A light frame isn't stiff". Again, bullsh*t.
Curmudgeons saying "A heavier bike always has better handling." I think the bull is running out of feces.


+1 LOL.

I remember all that crap. Careful you don't accidentally breathe on your cf top tube now!

There were people saying Lance is innocent also.

Perhaps the same chaps!

They've all melted away to even more deviant corners of the internet :wink:
I don't see many people with a clue about cycling buying Dogmas these days.

Oh, wait a minute. That's not Dogmas, that's Mavics, and that's not me saying that, that's sawyer saying that. :roll:
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=113&t=113639&start=15#p970284


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], sedluk, Swoosh and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Considering a Dogma 2 build, had a weight and seatpost Q

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

Chiho

20

1244

Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:07 pm

sedluk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dogma 65.1 sizing help.

in Road

Sparks

9

1262

Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:55 pm

Geoff View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dogma 65.1; Look 695 or Colnago C59

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

hdeprins

26

2446

Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:46 pm

Edo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Pinarello Dogma ?'s

in Road

upside

6

931

Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:54 pm

upside View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Dogma 2 seatpost length

in Road

ParisCarbon

1

390

Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:23 pm

cycleboyco View the latest post


It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 1:39 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB