HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Posts: 1891
Location: Islip, NY
20 and up. I have had no demand for lower than 20 spoke count wheels and I prefer the added benefits of a few extra spokes.

Internal nipples aren't in the cards right now, but this project is young.

_________________
www.ergottwheels.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:11 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:58 am
Posts: 223
Location: Chicago
Would love a version in silver.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:11 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:29 am
Posts: 177
Would love a tubular version! Would make an awesome set of training/group ride wheels. Reasonable weight, great aesthetics and without the costs of carbon. Any chance that's under consideration?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:52 am 
Offline
Tubbie Guru

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 2:20 am
Posts: 5796
Location: Belgium
Hi,

dwaharvey wrote:
I'd love to see it available with internal nipples as an option


Why would you? There's nothing to be gained but more mass towards the extremity of the rim and more trouble in case the wheel needs truing.

Actually, the entire concept of the rim is reminding me of the good ole (but major heavy) Mavic Cosmic Elite rim from pre 2011.

Ciao, ;)

_________________
Being a snob is an expensive hobby.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:45 am
Posts: 25
Awesome. Thanks for sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 4:27 am
Posts: 28
Location: BC, Canada
As far as the question about internal nipples - correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't having a smaller hole in the rim at the nipple decrease the likelihood of cracking around the nipple? Seems with everyone making lighter rims (and especially on a version 1.0),a smaller hole (ie. internal nipple) would be a good idea as it would better preserve the integrity of the rim and better resist a nipple pulling through the rim. Nipple washers could be a band-aid instead. There is also the claim that internal nipples are more aero - but I don't know how significant that is... As a light rider, I very rarely have to true my wheels - so not the end of the world having to pull the tire off when necessary; if we were talking tubulars - I agree, it would be a real pain. Open to hear other thoughts on the matter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 2:32 pm
Posts: 71
teleguy57 wrote:
Would love a tubular version! Would make an awesome set of training/group ride wheels. Reasonable weight, great aesthetics and without the costs of carbon. Any chance that's under consideration?


Wondering this too. I'd really be interested in a tubular version of this rim.

Great rim as a clincher though. Congrats to all involved! If/when I want another clincher set, I'll probably be getting these.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 400
Location: USA
@fdegrove... Trillo111 answered this for me; my thoughts mirror his. Seems like it should make for a stronger, more aerodynamic rim, and I can't remember the last time I had to true one of the wheels I built.

_________________
Enjoying my Funk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:43 am 
Offline
Tubbie Guru

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 2:20 am
Posts: 5796
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Well, everything is a compromise as you know.
In this case however I see no real benefit in adding weight to the periphery of the wheel, the aero benefit of putting the nipples inside being arguable at best.

That said, I feel it's best for the designers to speak up and defend their design choices.

Ciao, ;)

_________________
Being a snob is an expensive hobby.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Posts: 1891
Location: Islip, NY
The biggest reason is demand. I thought that internally drilled rims would be a great idea too. I remember me and a few other builders had the distributor order a batch of XR270 rims internally drilled. They were such a hard sell. People passed and went with the standard rim almost every time. I understand that taking a tire/tube off every time you need to true wheels sounds like a non issue, but I think the thought of removing rim tape and putting on new tape can be annoying. Of course, you shouldn't have to true your wheels often if at all!

Any performance benefits are very small if at all. It is seen as less consumer friendly and when the option was there, it wasn't as popular. These are the main reasons not to have internally drilled rims. It's not like something that you can do as a group buy. We order rims in the many hundred to thousands level (combined).

That might not be the answer you were looking for, but it's the truth. I don't mind working with internal nipples at all and I do like the look.

_________________
www.ergottwheels.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 8:18 pm
Posts: 526
Location: Netherlands
Nice..
I'd prefer them all silver, too, but there you go. Like Fdegrove said, the aero benefit of internal nipples is arguable at best. Zipp found no benefit whatsoever, fwiw. Unlike spoke count (to a limit) and shape. And while making aero-predictions is a bit like astrology, having a flush tire-rim interface does appear to be a smart thing to do. It seems to be a key factor in gettting low-profile rims reasonably aerodynamic.

So the plan is to sell rims only?

_________________
.
I love you guys. Seriously.
_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Posts: 1891
Location: Islip, NY
I got my rims! Here's my latest update.

http://ergottwheels.blogspot.com/2013/0 ... -rims.html

_________________
www.ergottwheels.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm
Posts: 196
trillo1111 wrote:
As far as the question about internal nipples - correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't having a smaller hole in the rim at the nipple decrease the likelihood of cracking around the nipple? Seems with everyone making lighter rims (and especially on a version 1.0),a smaller hole (ie. internal nipple) would be a good idea as it would better preserve the integrity of the rim and better resist a nipple pulling through the rim. Nipple washers could be a band-aid instead. There is also the claim that internal nipples are more aero - but I don't know how significant that is... As a light rider, I very rarely have to true my wheels - so not the end of the world having to pull the tire off when necessary; if we were talking tubulars - I agree, it would be a real pain. Open to hear other thoughts on the matter.



Actually, this is wrong. A smaller hole may leave more material but a smaller hole creates a greater stress concentration (raiser). Fatigue cracks always start as stress concentrations. In certain situations, outside of bicycle components, we actually drill a larger hole when a stress fracture forms to remove the fracture and reduce the likelihood of another one forming. Anyways, spokes pull through rims due to this so making a smaller hole increases the need for reinforcement around the holes. In this instance, decreasing the hole size in half roughly means we need to make the material surrounding it - to a fast mental estimation of dimensions - about 35% stronger.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:35 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:27 am
Posts: 1244
Location: McCall, ID
Thanks for the update on those Ergott. The more I hear about them, the more intrigued I become. How would you say quality compares to a C2 Belgium or XC279? In the same league? Nicer?

_________________
http://www.zencyclery.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:35 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 147
Location: San Mateo, California
Where will these rims be made?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], bontyboy, Exabot [Bot] and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Pacenti rim tape

in Road

yongkun

2

589

Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:01 am

yongkun View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Waiting for Campagnolo full carbon clinchers

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

poppiholla

19

2262

Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:50 pm

mriddle View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. And finally , BORA get fat?

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

in Road

tallicaboy

56

7779

Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:32 pm

ianSWBB View the latest post


It is currently Thu Nov 27, 2014 9:59 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB