Custom steel ISP vs standard seat post. Weight & comfort.

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

MDH
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:13 pm
Location: England

by MDH

I've searched this subject but couldn't find anything that answered my questions.
I'm having a frame built with Columbus Spirit. I like the idea of a seat mast as the bike will only be ridden by me and I don't intend to break it down for travel purposes. I just wondered what weight differences, if any, there are in a steel mast vs a modern lightweight post? Also, being steel, would there be a comfort benefit with the mast?
Any help or experience much appreciated.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



MDH
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:13 pm
Location: England

by MDH

My frame will be 61cm.

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7917
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

Here were the results of road vibration tests performed @ MIT on Cervelo frames which were essentially equivalent except for material type: steel, Al, or carbon fiber. The Al transmitted a bit more vibration than the other two at certain frequencies, but not dramatically so:

Image

The downside of steel would be the additional mass. With carbon ISP versus conventional Al or C post is fairly close. So I'd believe steel ISP would be heavier than Al post. I can't be certain of that, however.

Here's results from a VeloNews test on posts. They also found Al transmitted a bit more vibration than C (slightly, among other factors). Presumably steel would be close to carbon:

Image

User Name
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm

by User Name

Hmm, I'm no egg-spert, but I didn't think most modern round steel tubes were designed to be 'masted', because the walls are so thin (a standard Spirit seat tube is only 0.6mm thick at the top end: http://www.columbustubi.com/eng/4_4_2.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ), however, it's obviously being done. I wonder if they use custom-drawn tubes with a thicker section for the mast, or do they just shove a regular post all the way down past the top tube, as per usual? Interesting.

Personally, I wouldn't like to have a "post" with 0.6mm walls, even if it was steel. Steel is obviously a lot stronger than alu, but many alu post walls are ~3.5mm-thick at the high-stress areas for a reason


Image

MDH
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:13 pm
Location: England

by MDH

Thanks.
Interesting on the seat post tests.
Although I'm no expert, I'm personally not worried about a steel mast regards it's strength. I've certainly not read or seen anything which would give cause for concern. Some of the English frames have pretty long seat masts.
I guess I could try and get my builder to weigh the addition tube.

gummee
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:01 pm

by gummee

If you're not hopping on that seat mast (aka racing cross) I don't *think* you'll have a problem.

I've seen a pic one frame that someone landed on and the seatmast bent backwards, so IMO cross + steel seatmast = bad idea.

...but I'm not expert. I'd wander over to Velocipede Salon and ask there too. Lots smarter people than I am hang out there.

HTH

M

BmanX
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:31 pm

by BmanX

I love how this rides and yes of course it would be lighter with a carbon or lightweight post but this is so much sexier.

Image
Image
BIG DADDY B FLOW
AERO & LIGHT is RIGHT for 2 decades

User Name
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm

by User Name

Is this mast wider than the rest of the seat tube, or is it an illusion created by the shadow under the top of the seat stay?

Image
Last edited by User Name on Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:13 am, edited 3 times in total.

User Name
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm

by User Name

gummee wrote:I've seen a pic one frame that someone landed on and the seatmast bent backwards, so IMO cross + steel seatmast = bad idea.
That's not surprising; it's pretty thin stuff. I bet if someone made a steel seatpost, the walls would be way thicker than 0.6mm, even it was a 'bling' one for the high-end market.
My Ultra Foco Cervelo Superprodigy has just cracked for the second time (in 8 years) at the seat tube/seat stay/top tube juncture, and it obviously has a standard seatpost set-up. I used to have a had habit of slamming back down on the saddle after a standing effort, which might've caused the first crack, but I'm not sure about the 2nd one.

User avatar
elviento
Posts: 1199
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: In the industry
Contact:

by elviento

It's extremely unlikely a skilled frame builder would use 0.6mm tubing for the seat tube collar. Or the cluster, for that matter.

User Name -- that looks like a shadow. Nothing on the rest of that frame possibly indicates any necessity for a wider mast.
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

RichTheRoadie
Tinker, Taylor, Tart
Posts: 2070
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Aus.

by RichTheRoadie

elviento wrote:Nothing on the rest of that frame possibly indicates any necessity for a wider mast.

It probably is wider - steel ISPs necessitate the joining of two steel tubes to make the ISP long enough. That's why you don't see many of them, and why there's always* a join involved somehow.

* Sacha White (of Speedvagen / Vanilla) I believe has custom steel tubes made for his ISPs, but I also think the difficulty / cost / complication / limited supply could be part of the reason he is now offering a carbon ISP option.

User avatar
elviento
Posts: 1199
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: In the industry
Contact:

by elviento

That's interesting. Can't they just order a longer tube?

BTW, dug up another pic...
Attachments
nahbs_day2_z_33.jpg
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

RichTheRoadie
Tinker, Taylor, Tart
Posts: 2070
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Aus.

by RichTheRoadie

Not that simple (or cheap) as I understand it - which is why, as I say, Speedvagen / Vanilla tubes are custom and most others don't bother.

It is also a heavier option on steel which removes another benefit of doing it on Ti, Alu & carbon.

xnavalav8r
Posts: 2594
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm

by xnavalav8r

I don't know if my steel seat mast is lighter than an aluminum or carbon seatpost, but it is beautiful and I love the ride feel.

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79009&hilit=custom+steel

Image

User avatar
CharlesM
Posts: 5759
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Phoenix Arizona

by CharlesM

I think more of a big deal is being made of this than it really is...

Any builder can do it and any builder worth a damn will have no problem doing it without a lot of weight penalty versus adding a binder bolt and clamp for a carbon post...

The steel seat tube can be fairly thin walled and not a massive weight penalty with a reasonably light topper.


Image

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply