"PRO" Cycling Discussion

Moderator: Moderator Team

Page 969 of 1166

[ 17482 posts ]

Go to page Previous  1 ... 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972 ... 1166  Next

Print view Previous topic | Next topic

Author	Message
maquisard	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:01 am
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:51 pm Posts: 695 Location: France	Exactly, people assume that Pro teams always train on the top of range kit. They don't, particularly the domestiques. Ultegra is fine.
Top

Tinea Pedis	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:05 am
Moderator Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am Posts: 6580 Location: Geeeelong!	NS wrote: Wonder when SRM are going to run out of 7800 cranks? Given that's 7900, maybe they already have _________________ Baum Ristretto, Baum Mondrian Corretto & the '89 Merckx! | "If you could eat it in one sitting, hold your line." | twitter.com/Tinea_Pedis
Top

NS	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:20 pm
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 7:27 pm Posts: 2468 Location: At the bottom of the barrel & starting to dig	Really? Would you like to have another look at the crank not the pm the crank looks like the 7800 one on my 7900 SRM
Top

djm	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:28 pm
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 12:19 pm Posts: 729 Location: Norway	Haven't seen any other arms than 7800 used either. If the new ones were to be machined like the 7800 are I guess there would be a gaping hole at the end due to the hollow construction? Probably not too difficult for SRM to get their hands on a bunch of NOS OEM 7800 arms? _________________ 12 Canyon Aeroad CF 9.0 ETE 12 Canyon Ultimate AL 11 Cervélo P2
Top

pastronef	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:38 pm
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am Posts: 589 Location: Asti, ITALIA	GIRO helmets for Katusha http://twitter.com/PuritoRodriguez/stat ... 28/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://twitter.com/PuritoRodriguez/stat ... 37/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; they lost Rabo/ Blanco, but they now have IAM and Katusha and BMC (together with Garmin and Champion Systems)
Top

Willier	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:58 pm
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:37 pm Posts: 1213	At last no more those ugly carerra helmets _________________ "Smart may have the answers, but stupid have all the interesting questions."
Top

Geoff	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:04 pm
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am Posts: 3906 Location: Canada	The 'new' Dura-Ace SRM PowerMeter crank still uses the 7800 arms. It is a problem. Eventually, they will run-out...
Top

Tinea Pedis	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:37 pm
Moderator Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am Posts: 6580 Location: Geeeelong!	NS wrote: Really? Would you like to have another look at the crank not the pm the crank looks like the 7800 one on my 7900 SRM I took 'crank' as the collective, not a reference to the arms _________________ Baum Ristretto, Baum Mondrian Corretto & the '89 Merckx! | "If you could eat it in one sitting, hold your line." | twitter.com/Tinea_Pedis
Top

pastronef	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:18 pm
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am Posts: 589 Location: Asti, ITALIA	ave wrote: I know it's nothing new, but these bars seems extremely narrow for Hansen's size. What I don't really know is what's the benefit? confirmed, 38 cm bars https://mobile.twitter.com/inrng/status ... 187457?p=v
Top

HammerTime2	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:24 pm
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm Posts: 4548 Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed	Is that c to c or o to o (in which case, really narrow) ?
Top

pastronef	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:26 pm
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am Posts: 589 Location: Asti, ITALIA	HammerTime2 wrote: Is that c to c or o to o (in which case, really narrow) ? c/c
Top

djconnel	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:31 pm
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm Posts: 6899 Location: San Francisco, CA	Narrow! _________________ http://djconnel.blogspot.com/ Fuji SL/1 Send your data to Weight Weenie listings!
Top

Willier	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:49 pm
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:37 pm Posts: 1213	165mm for Kashechkin _________________ "Smart may have the answers, but stupid have all the interesting questions."
Top

stella-azzurra	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:08 pm
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am Posts: 4476 Location: New York	Less flex in the sprint. Definitely acquired from the track. djconnel wrote: Narrow! _________________ I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree
Top

djm	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:54 pm
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 12:19 pm Posts: 729 Location: Norway	Wilier: Woah... craziest thing I've seen here! 165 mm is a lot. Assuming his bars doesn't have a lot of reach though, that would make it even crazier. _________________ 12 Canyon Aeroad CF 9.0 ETE 12 Canyon Ultimate AL 11 Cervélo P2
Top

Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending

Page 969 of 1166

[ 17482 posts ]

Go to page Previous  1 ... 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972 ... 1166  Next