Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:23 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
I came across this device lately. And the designer says this is to capitalize on the energy otherwise wasted in the ankling action while pedaling.

Frankly I am a bit lost on how this could work. But here is a pic for your thoughts.


Attachments:
a505db61jw1e0omz5mntaj.jpg
a505db61jw1e0omz5mntaj.jpg [ 118.55 KiB | Viewed 1569 times ]

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal
Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:17 am
Posts: 609
Location: Latvia
Cocaine is bad for designing bike parts.

_________________
Hand made upcycled bicycle tyre belts


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:43 am
Posts: 70
That's odd, for sure.

So, the sprocket on the pedal/platform shaft is ~14t and the one mounted on the crank is ~28 (very rough estimate from that picture. That means a 2:1 ratio, so its a torque multiplier.

Unless there are some one way clutches involved, that arrangement fixes the position of those platforms relative to each other. That means they would have to be timed to make sure they weren't out of position with each other. Sounds uncomfortable having your ankles timed together like that (couldn't do a 1 leg calf stretch for sure).

I don't see how it really would make any more power since all lower lef forces are in series with your upper leg forces and therefore reacted against them given the platform appears to be under the ball of the foot. Also, the crank itself wants to move at a constant velocity, else the whole bike would have to slow down/speed up. So, if you pushed your toe down on this bike, the crank would want to speed up. But, it can't. So, your upper leg would have to slow down by a 1:1 corresponding amount. That seems inefficient.

I do think moving the pedal mid-foot makes sense expecially for endurance riders and for triathelons. But, this is something very different.

Take into account weight and friction and I bet this is easily a net slower bike....just this one engineers $0.02.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7899
Location: San Francisco, CA
My guess is it's yet another example of the erroneous assumption that force applied perpendicular to the direction of motion is "wasted energy". Energy = force dot distance; the perpendicular component of force doesn't contribute.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Posts: 2690
Location: Mississippi
Yeah, what DJ said....... :noidea:

Anybody got a weight on that crank? :smartass:

_________________
Mosaic RS-1
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=138478

Cielo by Chris King Cross Racer
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=134376


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 854
Lol, a wind-up crank based on rotating the pedals?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
Here is a second version of this.

I communicated with the designer a bit more and looks like the idea is that at the 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock positions, the heel could push down and the torque is transfered to the BB via the mini-drivetrain to the BB thereby eliminating the dead spots in the revolution.

Theoretically it may work but I seriously doubt there is any net increase in overall efficiency considering so many extra pieces.

Plus I cringe at the thought of the Q-factor. And no pedaling through a corner due to little ground clearance.


Attachments:
fj.JPG
fj.JPG [ 63.86 KiB | Viewed 1171 times ]

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal
Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 2291
Location: Pedal Square
Extension of the ankle towards the end of a stride (6 o'clock position) is deeply engrained in the human physiology. Anything that substantially alters that motion sequence is likely to cost efficiency.

Yey for experimenting, though.

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Paging Italians -- Cicliolivieri.it a legit shop?

in Cycle Chat

HillRPete

2

404

Fri May 27, 2016 8:45 am

HillRPete View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Paging Clannagh, FastDad, Cryptic and other custom carbon people

in Road

WannabeWeenie

5

657

Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:24 pm

Werking View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Specialized epic expert wc weight savings

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in MTB

devinci

16

1547

Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:30 pm

DanW View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Attermann, Petterii, sanddancer, Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited