Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Enve 45 vs Smart 3.4's?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:36 pm
Posts: 92
With used Enve 45 wheelset approaching a $1000 on forums and ebay, how much better is the newer shape of the Smart 3.4's.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:02 pm
Posts: 80
A lot. The market is correct in this instance.

_________________
R5 VWD | 2008 SRAM Red | Rotor 3D+ SRM | Zipp 101s/Enve 3.4s
S5 Team | 2012 SRAM Red | Rotor 3D+ SRM | Enve 6.7s
P3C | Zipp Vuka Aero/R2C | Omega | FSA SRM | Zipp 808/Super 9 Disc
T1 | Scatto | Rolf Prima FX58


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:04 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 6579
Location: Geeeelong!
Not even comparable.

Believe the hype.

_________________
Baum Ristretto, Baum Mondrian Corretto & the '89 Merckx! | "If you could eat it in one sitting, hold your line." | twitter.com/Tinea_Pedis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:44 am
Posts: 1434
Location: Canada
Really ?

So we have to ditch our wheels quickly before they loose all value and get some wide rims ?

Where's those sarcastic emoticons hidden ?...

Louis :)

_________________
http://www.ccsalma.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 6:17 am 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:27 am
Posts: 1132
Location: McCall, ID
The ride quality of the 3.4 is in a different league than the 45. They are far more stable in crosswinds, and they braking is grabbier and more consistent on the descents. Even in their clincher version, they are absolutely exceptional.

_________________
http://www.zencyclery.com

http://www.wheelbuilder.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:03 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 6579
Location: Geeeelong!
Louis, mate that just makes you look silly.

No one said cables were second rate when Di2 came online. Fact is though, it offers a lot of advantages over cable actuated shifting.


Same theory with wide rims, there are a lot of advantages over the older V shapes. There will be some that prefer the older style and they can still build a nice wheel *cough* Lightweight *cough*

Fact remains though there are a lot of reasons to choose the newer SES style design, they really are that good.

_________________
Baum Ristretto, Baum Mondrian Corretto & the '89 Merckx! | "If you could eat it in one sitting, hold your line." | twitter.com/Tinea_Pedis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 am
Posts: 890
I have set of alchmey 6.7s and a pair of extralite 45s
My smart wheels are really bloody good.. But they ain't 990g unlike my 45s which are a lot lighter and snapper.

I use my 6.7s more but the 45s are the wheel of choice if there is any kinda hill or a sprint involved
3.4s are great and I'd totally own em but you can't build a sub kilo wheelset with em :mrgreen:

_________________
http://fairwheelbikes.com/cycling-blog/ ... ee-z5.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:44 am
Posts: 1434
Location: Canada
I just though it needed more explanation than the first two replies.

Maybe I used a bad "metaphore"...

Now I get a better picture.

Louis :)

_________________
http://www.ccsalma.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Posts: 1731
Location: Islip, NY
sugarkane wrote:

I use my 6.7s more but the 45s are the wheel of choice if there is any kinda hill or a sprint involved


Between your two wheelsets, the 6.7s are much better for a sprint. You want a stiffer wheelset that's more aerodynamic for sprinting. The extra weight is not an issue at sprinting speeds compared to the aerodynamic properties of those wheels if by sprinting you mean sticking your nose out in the wind and winning.

_________________
www.ergottwheels.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:27 am
Posts: 130
I think this depends on the course and finish. Flat course and finish I definitely prefer to be on my 303s, uphill sprint or even a course with big hill and flat finish I use my sub kilo 45s. I would guess the difference between 6.7s and kilo wheels is even more pronounced when hills are involved. But I've never rode the 6.7s so tifwiw.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 am
Posts: 890
expect my 45s are stiffer than my 6.7s. the 45s had the tensions pushed a bit over normal and are noticeable stiffer and much snapper in acceleration. i race my 6.7s most of the time but if the crit is going to be very surging, lots of sprinting outa corners the 45s keep me in the game for longer

they do brake way better though. i like both wheelsets a lot. when you use one you haven't been using for a while they both make you smile about how good they are

_________________
http://fairwheelbikes.com/cycling-blog/ ... ee-z5.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1120
Location: In the industry
Can't help thinking (as un-weenie as it is) maybe the UCI 6.8 rule is allowing a lot of aerodynamics techonology to develop. Otherwise, all manufacturers would be trying hard to knock off 30 grams here and there.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
twitter: Falco_bike
Facebook: falco.bike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 1222
elviento wrote:
Can't help thinking (as un-weenie as it is) maybe the UCI 6.8 rule is allowing a lot of aerodynamics techonology to develop. Otherwise, all manufacturers would be trying hard to knock off 30 grams here and there.


I am not so certain. Perhaps for very mountainous stages they would, but with the now widespread knowledge of aero's predominant influence on cycling speed, I think this push would still be on.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anders, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], shimmeD, ultimobici and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Firecrest / Enve Smart chainstay clearance

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

12x23

15

1136

Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:05 am

12x23 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. BOR vs. Rotor 3D+ vs. Tune Smart Foot

in Road

Dammit

4

786

Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:15 am

LarsEjaas View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Enve 8.9

in Road

davidrichardson

0

410

Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:54 pm

davidrichardson View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Enve 25 ERD

in Road

freshlegs

3

606

Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:35 pm

ergott View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. ENVE my Eye Candy

in Road

markieta

12

2412

Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:11 am

TOflat View the latest post


It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 10:36 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB