Enve 45 vs Smart 3.4's?

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
Post Reply
blantonator
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:36 pm

by blantonator

With used Enve 45 wheelset approaching a $1000 on forums and ebay, how much better is the newer shape of the Smart 3.4's.

by Weenie


refthimos
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:02 pm

by refthimos

A lot. The market is correct in this instance.
EVO Hi-Mod | 9070 Di2 | Rotor 2Inpower | Aeolus TLR 3/5
P5 | 9070 Di2 | Rotor 2Inpower | Aeolus TLR 7
T1 | Power2Max Type S | Rolf Prima FX58/Zipp Super 9 Disc
SuperX Hi-Mod Disc | Sram Red | Power2Max NG

User avatar
Tinea Pedis
Posts: 8416
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Location: Geelong
Contact:

by Tinea Pedis

Not even comparable.

Believe the hype.

User avatar
LouisN
Posts: 2290
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:44 am
Location: Canada

by LouisN

Really ?

So we have to ditch our wheels quickly before they loose all value and get some wide rims ?

Where's those sarcastic emoticons hidden ?...

Louis :)

User avatar
Zen Cyclery
Shop Owner
Posts: 1244
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:27 am
Location: McCall, ID
Contact:

by Zen Cyclery

The ride quality of the 3.4 is in a different league than the 45. They are far more stable in crosswinds, and they braking is grabbier and more consistent on the descents. Even in their clincher version, they are absolutely exceptional.

User avatar
Tinea Pedis
Posts: 8416
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Location: Geelong
Contact:

by Tinea Pedis

Louis, mate that just makes you look silly.

No one said cables were second rate when Di2 came online. Fact is though, it offers a lot of advantages over cable actuated shifting.


Same theory with wide rims, there are a lot of advantages over the older V shapes. There will be some that prefer the older style and they can still build a nice wheel *cough* Lightweight *cough*

Fact remains though there are a lot of reasons to choose the newer SES style design, they really are that good.

User avatar
sugarkane
in the industry
Posts: 1796
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 am
Location: SYD
Contact:

by sugarkane

I have set of alchmey 6.7s and a pair of extralite 45s
My smart wheels are really bloody good.. But they ain't 990g unlike my 45s which are a lot lighter and snapper.

I use my 6.7s more but the 45s are the wheel of choice if there is any kinda hill or a sprint involved
3.4s are great and I'd totally own em but you can't build a sub kilo wheelset with em :mrgreen:

User avatar
LouisN
Posts: 2290
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:44 am
Location: Canada

by LouisN

I just though it needed more explanation than the first two replies.

Maybe I used a bad "metaphore"...

Now I get a better picture.

Louis :)

User avatar
ergott
Posts: 2718
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Location: Islip, NY
Contact:

by ergott

sugarkane wrote:
I use my 6.7s more but the 45s are the wheel of choice if there is any kinda hill or a sprint involved


Between your two wheelsets, the 6.7s are much better for a sprint. You want a stiffer wheelset that's more aerodynamic for sprinting. The extra weight is not an issue at sprinting speeds compared to the aerodynamic properties of those wheels if by sprinting you mean sticking your nose out in the wind and winning.

ProudDaddy
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:27 am

by ProudDaddy

I think this depends on the course and finish. Flat course and finish I definitely prefer to be on my 303s, uphill sprint or even a course with big hill and flat finish I use my sub kilo 45s. I would guess the difference between 6.7s and kilo wheels is even more pronounced when hills are involved. But I've never rode the 6.7s so tifwiw.

User avatar
sugarkane
in the industry
Posts: 1796
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 am
Location: SYD
Contact:

by sugarkane

expect my 45s are stiffer than my 6.7s. the 45s had the tensions pushed a bit over normal and are noticeable stiffer and much snapper in acceleration. i race my 6.7s most of the time but if the crit is going to be very surging, lots of sprinting outa corners the 45s keep me in the game for longer

they do brake way better though. i like both wheelsets a lot. when you use one you haven't been using for a while they both make you smile about how good they are

User avatar
elviento
Posts: 1235
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: In the industry
Contact:

by elviento

Can't help thinking (as un-weenie as it is) maybe the UCI 6.8 rule is allowing a lot of aerodynamics techonology to develop. Otherwise, all manufacturers would be trying hard to knock off 30 grams here and there.
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

BdaGhisallo
Posts: 1797
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm

by BdaGhisallo

elviento wrote:Can't help thinking (as un-weenie as it is) maybe the UCI 6.8 rule is allowing a lot of aerodynamics techonology to develop. Otherwise, all manufacturers would be trying hard to knock off 30 grams here and there.


I am not so certain. Perhaps for very mountainous stages they would, but with the now widespread knowledge of aero's predominant influence on cycling speed, I think this push would still be on.

by Weenie


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post