Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sun Dec 04, 2016 11:38 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Enve 45 vs Smart 3.4's?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:36 pm
Posts: 111
With used Enve 45 wheelset approaching a $1000 on forums and ebay, how much better is the newer shape of the Smart 3.4's.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:02 pm
Posts: 96
A lot. The market is correct in this instance.

_________________
EVO Hi-Mod | 9070 di2 | Pioneer PM | Aeolus 3s/5s
SuperX Hi-Mod Disc | Sram Red | Pioneer PM
P5 | 9070 di2 | Pioneer PM | Zipp 808/Super 9 Disc
T1 | Scatto | Rolf Prima FX58/Zipp Super 9 Disc


Top
   
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:24 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 8269
Location: Geelong
Not even comparable.

Believe the hype.

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:44 am
Posts: 2104
Location: Canada
Really ?

So we have to ditch our wheels quickly before they loose all value and get some wide rims ?

Where's those sarcastic emoticons hidden ?...

Louis :)


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 6:17 am 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:27 am
Posts: 1244
Location: McCall, ID
The ride quality of the 3.4 is in a different league than the 45. They are far more stable in crosswinds, and they braking is grabbier and more consistent on the descents. Even in their clincher version, they are absolutely exceptional.

_________________
http://www.zencyclery.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 8269
Location: Geelong
Louis, mate that just makes you look silly.

No one said cables were second rate when Di2 came online. Fact is though, it offers a lot of advantages over cable actuated shifting.


Same theory with wide rims, there are a lot of advantages over the older V shapes. There will be some that prefer the older style and they can still build a nice wheel *cough* Lightweight *cough*

Fact remains though there are a lot of reasons to choose the newer SES style design, they really are that good.

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:15 am 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 am
Posts: 1507
Location: SYD
I have set of alchmey 6.7s and a pair of extralite 45s
My smart wheels are really bloody good.. But they ain't 990g unlike my 45s which are a lot lighter and snapper.

I use my 6.7s more but the 45s are the wheel of choice if there is any kinda hill or a sprint involved
3.4s are great and I'd totally own em but you can't build a sub kilo wheelset with em :mrgreen:

_________________
Skunkworks Bikes


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:44 am
Posts: 2104
Location: Canada
I just though it needed more explanation than the first two replies.

Maybe I used a bad "metaphore"...

Now I get a better picture.

Louis :)


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Posts: 2438
Location: Islip, NY
sugarkane wrote:

I use my 6.7s more but the 45s are the wheel of choice if there is any kinda hill or a sprint involved


Between your two wheelsets, the 6.7s are much better for a sprint. You want a stiffer wheelset that's more aerodynamic for sprinting. The extra weight is not an issue at sprinting speeds compared to the aerodynamic properties of those wheels if by sprinting you mean sticking your nose out in the wind and winning.

_________________
www.ergottwheels.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:27 am
Posts: 134
I think this depends on the course and finish. Flat course and finish I definitely prefer to be on my 303s, uphill sprint or even a course with big hill and flat finish I use my sub kilo 45s. I would guess the difference between 6.7s and kilo wheels is even more pronounced when hills are involved. But I've never rode the 6.7s so tifwiw.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:16 am 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 am
Posts: 1507
Location: SYD
expect my 45s are stiffer than my 6.7s. the 45s had the tensions pushed a bit over normal and are noticeable stiffer and much snapper in acceleration. i race my 6.7s most of the time but if the crit is going to be very surging, lots of sprinting outa corners the 45s keep me in the game for longer

they do brake way better though. i like both wheelsets a lot. when you use one you haven't been using for a while they both make you smile about how good they are

_________________
Skunkworks Bikes


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
Can't help thinking (as un-weenie as it is) maybe the UCI 6.8 rule is allowing a lot of aerodynamics techonology to develop. Otherwise, all manufacturers would be trying hard to knock off 30 grams here and there.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
   
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:42 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 1491
elviento wrote:
Can't help thinking (as un-weenie as it is) maybe the UCI 6.8 rule is allowing a lot of aerodynamics techonology to develop. Otherwise, all manufacturers would be trying hard to knock off 30 grams here and there.


I am not so certain. Perhaps for very mountainous stages they would, but with the now widespread knowledge of aero's predominant influence on cycling speed, I think this push would still be on.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2016 Zipp 202 FC Clinchers vs. Enve Smart 3.4 CCL

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Morta

26

3048

Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:52 am

djqgmffj View the latest post

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. ENVE SES 4.5 or Lightweight???

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

jerrybrabus

32

2961

Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:02 am

reggiebaseball View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Looking At Enve 3.4's - Hub Question

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

McGilli

15

1023

Thu Sep 29, 2016 6:18 am

McGilli View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Enve 2.0 Fork

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

beatle

17

3454

Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:32 pm

beatle View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 404 NSW vs Enve 4.5 on crosswinds

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

omerhorovitz

22

3450

Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 am

omerhorovitz View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bogan, istigatrice, jonasd and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited