tarmac sl3 stack and reach
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:03 am
SL4 geo according to:
http://www.pacosbike.com/product_info.p ... s_id=36066" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
stack and reach 543 and 387 for 54
http://www.pacosbike.com/product_info.p ... s_id=36066" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
stack and reach 543 and 387 for 54
r o y g b i v
is stack/reach more important or top tube length. the difference between TT lengths is 17mm between the 54 and 56 but the reach difference is only 8mm. The shops says its a difference of a 2 cm stem between the 2 bikes. I'm currently riding a 56cm Litespeed Icon with a stack of 551 and reach of 391. After adding the Chris King headset it seems the 56 cm Tarmac is still lower than my bike. Which bike would fit most closely?
-
- Shop Owner
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
- Location: NoVA/DC
Stack/reach tells you more than just top tube length. Add seat tube angle to top tube lengths and you have similar tools. as with any tool, you have to know how to use it.
I haven't checked the sizes of the sl4, but I assume the seat tube angles are close or equal. Then, as with any bike, when the head tube gets taller, the reach measurement is naturally shorter. If the head tube angle was 90degrees, then stack would not affect reach. so you are looking for a certain reach measurement, at a certain stack measurement. Having the right reach at the wrong stack is NOT the same.
With top tube length, a frame can change seat tube angle, affecting overall reach of the bike without one realising it. And it does not tell you how high/low the bars can be.
I haven't checked the sizes of the sl4, but I assume the seat tube angles are close or equal. Then, as with any bike, when the head tube gets taller, the reach measurement is naturally shorter. If the head tube angle was 90degrees, then stack would not affect reach. so you are looking for a certain reach measurement, at a certain stack measurement. Having the right reach at the wrong stack is NOT the same.
With top tube length, a frame can change seat tube angle, affecting overall reach of the bike without one realising it. And it does not tell you how high/low the bars can be.
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:03 am
Seat position is a different measurement from stack and reach.
You always set your seat to the same position in relation to the BB, or you should. You have to select a seat post with appropriate setback to allow your preferred position so assuming you will be able to achieve that position (highly unlikely that you wont be able to), that leaves stack and reach as the appropriate variables to consider for frame fit regardless of seat tube angle.
You always set your seat to the same position in relation to the BB, or you should. You have to select a seat post with appropriate setback to allow your preferred position so assuming you will be able to achieve that position (highly unlikely that you wont be able to), that leaves stack and reach as the appropriate variables to consider for frame fit regardless of seat tube angle.
r o y g b i v
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 11 Replies
- 1364 Views
-
Last post by silvalis
Fri Sep 01, 2017 12:23 pm
-
- 32 Replies
- 1207 Views
-
Last post by coriordan
Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:11 pm
-
-
Frame Stack and Reach sizing- What is your tolerance?
by davidalone » Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:34 pm » in Road - 30 Replies
- 2118 Views
-
Last post by DCcyclist
Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:03 pm
-
-
-
2016 TCR Advanced M Size Stack and Reach different?
by MagicShite » Sat Dec 09, 2017 5:17 am » in Road - 7 Replies
- 926 Views
-
Last post by Mr.Gib
Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:51 am
-
-
- 4 Replies
- 546 Views
-
Last post by joejack951
Tue Jan 23, 2018 8:46 pm