HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm
Posts: 196
I know this is weightweenies but I was wondering if anyone has seen any numbers on the aerodynamics of a small tubed steel bicycle say against a monstrous tubed Al or CF bike? I was wondering how much one loses with something like my CAAD10 in aerodynamics against a more classic bike, considering only the frame. If we don't have numbers, any of you out there ridden enough bikes tot hink you can tell a difference?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:34 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 584
Location: it's raining, it must be uk
round section isn't a great aero shape, but most tubes are at an angle to the airflow (assuming headwind), so they present a more aero elliptical section, i'd guess a lot of frame drag is down to the headtube

rider size/clothing/position make a huge difference to drag, you'd need to measure a specific individual on different frames (and wheels) to see which worked best together, even then the results would only be for that person/position, and which frame is more aero may still vary depending on yaw angle

there're a few threads on ww about the aero frame topic, for instance...

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=106591

...contains links to some tests


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm
Posts: 196
Thanks for the link. I've seen a couple of these studies and they only ever compare carbon to carbon. I agree that round isn't the most aerodynamic shape with respect to coefficient of drag, but steel is capable of such a smaller frontal area to the wind at any yaw angle, that perhaps where trying to engineer ourselves back to where we used to be in terms of total frame drag. I'm a mech e but not in bicycle engineering so I can only make gross estimates to C_d and frontal area's... I do agree the rider will always be the most significant part of both the weight and aerodynamics equation, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], cyclenutnz, Exabot [Bot], physeter, Yahoo [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Trouble finding good gloves for those who are tall and thin.

in Road

locktopus

6

251

Tue Dec 16, 2014 1:47 am

locktopus View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stainless Steel or Traditional Steel?

in Road

HugoDrax

12

2501

Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:20 pm

shlammed View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Which e-tubes to buy?

in Road

showdown

8

1302

Fri Jan 10, 2014 5:30 pm

LeviR View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lighter tubes? Noticeable?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

PLuKE

25

1238

Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:46 am

AGW View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Continental Race 28 Light Inner Tubes

in Road

Valbrona

1

446

Mon Feb 03, 2014 3:01 pm

DWatkinsBSB View the latest post


It is currently Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:25 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB