2014 fsa k-force crankset

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
Post Reply
Posts: 1080
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:52 am

by spartan

everyone is going proprietary on chainring design.
i don't this will work. shimano9000 110 spacing will become the new standard




Current Rides:

2017 Giant TCR Advanced SL 0 DI2 9150

User avatar
Posts: 853
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: The Netherlands

by SWijland

spartan wrote:

Somehow I am struggling to see the difference. But then again, I am no expert.

by Weenie

Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:46 pm

by odin99

the black crankset on the right looks sort of like darkgray 6700 ultegra with the new bolt pattern (albeit the new FSA is carbon). i bet the next gen ultegra will look similar.

Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:32 pm
Location: S.E. TN

by lechat

If $ is in the equation and your in the market for bb30, new Sram Red blows everything else out of the water. $325-350 on eBay. Relist the heavy (and ugly) chainrings for $75 and buy some light ones.
You'll have a crank as light as a SISL for 1/2 the price.

Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:50 pm

by woody55

What's the difference between the K-Force light and the K-Foce light?

Can't even spell their own product name correctly???

Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:41 pm

by Monkeyboy3333

imo they look grim

Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:52 pm

by zambony

OMG this is ugly. I really like the look of the old Kforce light, but this one (like the DA9000) are horrible.

As for the "stress distribution" picture, they mean absolutely nothing since the scale isn't plot. This is TOTAL BS.

Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:38 am

by ricerocket

It's FSA, who cares (unless you want to break your face).

Posts: 662
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:19 pm

by mjduct

FSA = Fail Supremely Again

User avatar
Posts: 2014
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:03 pm
Location: San Francisco Peninsula

by jmilliron

All black one looks clean. Might get one in EVO386 for my bike.
2013 Wilier Cento1 SR || 2009 Ridley Crossbow || 2011 Yeti AS-R 5 Carbon

User avatar
Posts: 1235
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: In the industry

by elviento

The illustration shows pedal at 1:30 position, which is not when the crank is most heavily loaded. Rather, 3:00 and 4:00 are more relevant.

However, it might be the most advantageous (albeit hard to tell) position for the K-Force.
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

Posts: 589
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm

by davidalone

from the FEA results, it looks like the new design stresses the chainrings (marginally) less over a smaller area than the 4 bolt and 5 bolt design, which could mean better front shifting. looks like an evolution if the shimano 4 bolt pattern.

But meh, I don;t think theres actually much of a difference from the shimano 9000 deisgn to actually bother. the shimano 4 bolt is going to be the new standard. FSA is just being different for the sake of it.

now if SHimano bought over this technology and made it the new standard, then we'd be talking... but FSA doesnt have the draw that shimano has...

by Weenie

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Last post