HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5073
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
thisisatest wrote:
HammerTime2 wrote:
Whether or not KOPS is adhered to, upper vs. lower leg length is of paramount impact to setback.

For what?
For what it winds up being (for high level) riders.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 381
Location: Tucson, AZ
Here's an updated list with saddle height and some additional riders. Some riders are duplicated with different measurements from different seasons. I think that the % provides an excellent starting point for saddle adjustment for the racing/performance-oriented rider. I'm going to measure my setback and saddle height and see how it compares. As a person with unremarkable proportions, I'm guessing it will fall close to the average % regardless of upper/lower leg lengths.


Attachments:
critical measurements.JPG
critical measurements.JPG [ 156.1 KiB | Viewed 904 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:01 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:31 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1960
Location: NoVA/DC
HammerTime2 wrote:
thisisatest wrote:
HammerTime2 wrote:
Whether or not KOPS is adhered to, upper vs. lower leg length is of paramount impact to setback.

For what?
For what it winds up being (for high level) riders.

I meant, the upper/lower leg ratio is of paramount impact to setback, why?
Ignoring KOPS, what does the leg ratio mean for fore-aft now? To adhere to any knee fore-aft for riders with different ratios is merely altering their weight distribution on the bike. Granted, the rider with the shorter thigh will have his hip go through a wider range of motion, but that in itself does not mandate a more forward position. Foot length and ankling would matter equally, but nobody ever considers that.
Awesome chart, btw. thanks. Now I know that if I ever have the opportunity to buy a used pro bike, it ought to be Jeremy Powers' bike!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:30 am
Posts: 109
Interesting.Gilbert changed saddle height from 78cm to 76cm.That´s a lot!...Setback was also changed but 2cm´s is pretty drastic..If one is to believe those numbers?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:40 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1960
Location: NoVA/DC
Could be a different saddle, one that hammocks at the point bisecting the seat tube line. fore-aft would be affected by different nose lengths too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 381
Location: Tucson, AZ
He raised the saddle between Jan. and July 2011 when those measurements were taken. The same bike and saddle (flite) are used. He could have been refining his position or moving his cleats forward. :noidea:

Cavendish, on the other hand, is all over the place. I remember reading or hearing that he may even change his saddle height a centimeter or two between stages of a Grand Tour depending on the terrain.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:54 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 1736
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
The numbers I have tabulated to date suggest some of the differences could be attributed to measurement error as well (different people measuring differently, etc.)

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:58 am
Posts: 787
Location: 604
WW's is awesome. Unlike almost every other bike forum this one is full of actual knowledge and information! Love this stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:09 pm
Posts: 590
Interesting to see however there could be a bunch of confounding variable here as well. I feel like cleat position. pedal type and shoe brand all can have a pretty big impact on saddle height. For example, running Bont's with Speedplays will result in a noticeable lower stack height than say Sidi's and Shimano SPD-SL's.

Regardless kind of neat to see a range of some of the heights. Turns out I fall somewhat within the range being 5' 8'' or so and having a saddle height of 72.8cm. Now bear in mind I'm riding Speedplay and Bont so super low stack height

_________________
Looks like I made a new 90 Proof friend


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 381
Location: Tucson, AZ
Interesting! The only pro that rides more setback than me, as a % of my height, is Tom Boonen. :lol:

Height: 1.75m
Cycling inseam: 81.82cm
Upper leg: 58.42cm
Lower leg: 53.34cm
Saddle height from BB c-t: 73cm
Setback (SMP Evo): 9.7cm

What can I say? I guess I can't average myself to a pro without the rest of their stats. According to my chart, I'd have to move my saddle forward 2.4cm. I'd be doing pushups on my handlebars with that kind of weight distribution.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:37 pm
Posts: 71
AGW wrote:
Here's an updated list with saddle height and some additional riders. Some riders are duplicated with different measurements from different seasons. I think that the % provides an excellent starting point for saddle adjustment for the racing/performance-oriented rider. I'm going to measure my setback and saddle height and see how it compares. As a person with unremarkable proportions, I'm guessing it will fall close to the average % regardless of upper/lower leg lengths.


Took this saddle height and setback data and did some trig to get the average angle of virtual seat tube. I use the assumption that the middle of the seat is 15cm back from the tip (which on most seats is about where riders sit, and about where the 'center' alignment of the rails are).

The angle came out at 72.98 degrees. :thumbup:

Which is kinda interesting, as this is the angle used by many road bikes as a standard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7495
Location: San Francisco, CA
AGW wrote:
Here's an updated list with saddle height and some additional riders.


Can you post the data? (for example, CSV, SSV, TSV, etc)

It would be interesting to plot.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 1504
I recognize and appreciate the effort in gathering such data; but it seems unusable unless correlated to some body measurement.
I don't think we can conclude anything from averages because pro cyclists are probably not average in many ways.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 381
Location: Tucson, AZ
djconnel wrote:
AGW wrote:
Here's an updated list with saddle height and some additional riders.


Can you post the data? (for example, CSV, SSV, TSV, etc)

It would be interesting to plot.


I've managed to export the xls as a CSV, then I can select one or all of those upon opening. Not sure which to post.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:04 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7495
Location: San Francisco, CA
AGW wrote:
I've managed to export the xls as a CSV, then I can select one or all of those upon opening. Not sure which to post.


Maybe a Google Doc, or just post as text here if not too long.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. data analysis after an upgrade

in Training

project3

5

865

Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:01 pm

Krull View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Bicycle frame analysis on FEA

in Road

An1MuS

11

1030

Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:22 pm

An1MuS View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Favorite post-ride analysis program?

in Training

53x12

13

1245

Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:27 pm

eric View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 31.6 Road Seatpost with setback

in Road

boots2000

12

822

Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:26 pm

petepeterson View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. XS Scott Foil setback Question

in Road

xcnick

0

120

Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:44 pm

xcnick View the latest post


It is currently Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:22 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB