Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Thu May 26, 2016 9:42 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED

If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:52 am
Posts: 804
everyone is going proprietary on chainring design.
i don't this will work. shimano9000 110 spacing will become the new standard

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Current Rides:

2014 Trek 7.9 PO Sram E-Tap
2016 Emonda ALR Team Issue 9000 DA


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:41 pm
Posts: 853
Location: The Netherlands
spartan wrote:

Image


Somehow I am struggling to see the difference. But then again, I am no expert.

_________________
My Renovo R1 wooden bike project and the reason for my passion for all that is wood.

Check it out: the most amazing vintage Colnago, Merckx and Pinarello collection


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:46 pm
Posts: 187
the black crankset on the right looks sort of like darkgray 6700 ultegra with the new bolt pattern (albeit the new FSA is carbon). i bet the next gen ultegra will look similar.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 260
Location: S.E. TN
If $ is in the equation and your in the market for bb30, new Sram Red blows everything else out of the water. $325-350 on eBay. Relist the heavy (and ugly) chainrings for $75 and buy some light ones.
You'll have a crank as light as a SISL for 1/2 the price.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:50 pm
Posts: 16
What's the difference between the K-Force light and the K-Foce light?

Can't even spell their own product name correctly???


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:41 pm
Posts: 630
imo they look grim


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:52 pm
Posts: 38
OMG this is ugly. I really like the look of the old Kforce light, but this one (like the DA9000) are horrible.

As for the "stress distribution" picture, they mean absolutely nothing since the scale isn't plot. This is TOTAL BS.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:38 am
Posts: 502
It's FSA, who cares (unless you want to break your face).


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:19 pm
Posts: 659
FSA = Fail Supremely Again


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:03 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: San Francisco Peninsula
All black one looks clean. Might get one in EVO386 for my bike.

_________________
2013 Wilier Cento1 SR || 2009 Ridley Crossbow || 2011 Yeti AS-R 5 Carbon


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
The illustration shows pedal at 1:30 position, which is not when the crank is most heavily loaded. Rather, 3:00 and 4:00 are more relevant.

However, it might be the most advantageous (albeit hard to tell) position for the K-Force.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 539
from the FEA results, it looks like the new design stresses the chainrings (marginally) less over a smaller area than the 4 bolt and 5 bolt design, which could mean better front shifting. looks like an evolution if the shimano 4 bolt pattern.

But meh, I don;t think theres actually much of a difference from the shimano 9000 deisgn to actually bother. the shimano 4 bolt is going to be the new standard. FSA is just being different for the sake of it.

now if SHimano bought over this technology and made it the new standard, then we'd be talking... but FSA doesnt have the draw that shimano has...


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Sram Force Crankset 0.26mm Play at NDS Axle-Bearing

in Road

aerobikewheels

12

646

Mon May 23, 2016 11:14 am

Marin View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Crankset compability with bb90 and 10 crankset speed on 11?

in Road

funkyfusion

7

542

Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:19 am

funkyfusion View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. SR11 crankset or Rotor 3D30 crankset - which one

in Road

fh8425

5

339

Mon Feb 15, 2016 2:23 pm

fh8425 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help me - Component Upgrade on 2014 Cervelo R3

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

rhyshan

35

1922

Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:54 am

rhyshan View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cervelo 2014 R2 seatpost size

in Road

mikemon

1

162

Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:20 am

AZR3 View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], CBJ, MSNbot Media, Racingevo and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited