HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:45 pm
Posts: 166
I have a frame that has a 541mm toptube and a 420mm reach, while the Canyon Roadlite has 542mm and 370mm, they have different ST-angles and I haven`t measured my current bike accurately, but still, is it possible the difference is that big?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:49 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 548
Location: it's raining, it must be uk
yes

aside from the effect of seat tube angle difference, is the head tube angle the same? the top tubes may be near the same length, but do they intersect with the seat tube and head tube at the same height? is the stem height, angle and length the same? are the bars the same?

between all those it'd be easy to end up with way more difference than 50mm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:41 pm
Posts: 218
Location: Shetland, Scotland
While it's not the traditional approach, I think stack and reach comparisons make it easier. Depending on the manufacturer's geometry ideas you can easy get their 52, 54 and 56 models with essentially the same reach, just different stacks.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 2527
While it might be possible to have that much difference in reach, it is not likely. The 420mm number makes no sense at all. If you look at the charts for most brands, the reach will be far less, even in the largest sizes. The STA only affects the reach by about 1cm per degree and the head tube length only 3mm for each 10mm of head tube difference.

Reach values can easily be misinterpreted because they are only comparable at the SAME stack height. If you're you're comparing 54cm and 56cm frames, for example, the later may have a 20mm taller head tube. You should subtract 6mm from the reach of the smaller frame to bring it up to the same minimum height as the larger frame. The difference in reach will then be 6mm greater than shown in the geometry chart.


Last edited by DaveS on Sat Nov 24, 2012 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 1402
What frame are you comparing to the Canyon?

Unless you have something totally odd like a 76 degree seat tube angle combined with an 70mm head tube it simply isn't possible to get a 420mm reach with a 541mm top tube.

You need to measure your stack and reach the same way Canyon does, and then correct the reach for any difference in stack to get a proper comparison.

I suspect your measuring reach on your current bike to the bars rather then to the center of the head tube?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:57 pm
Posts: 651
Location: NYC
Here are some sites that could help you sort through this and guide you in PROPERLY measuring stack/reach:

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/05/ ... lly_216035

http://www.cervelo.com/en/engineering/t ... d-fit.html

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=29177&start=0

EM3

_________________
______________

My 2013 Cervelo R5


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:54 am
Posts: 124
I found an Excel Spreadsheet online on Gearinches that enabled you to plug in various measurements from the geometry and it allowed you to compare frame shapes. Found it useful when buying my Canyon as this said I should go with the 58 to get the same reach as my Planet X where as Canyon's calculator suggested a 56 which would have been too small.

http://gearinches.com/blog/misc/bike-ge ... comparator" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 136
I agree with the others. No way a bike with a 541mm TT has a 420mm reach. Go re-measure.

_________________
Time VXRS Ulteam (7.16 kg)
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=120268


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 11:16 pm
Posts: 118
Just to hijack the thread a bit:

I have a Canyon CF 60cm and the 58 cm has the same reach but lower stack by about 20mm. Does that mean the 58 will be the same but feel a bit lower? :unbelievable:

_________________
London2Paris24 2014 Fundraising for Scope UK
Facebook Page for more information and updates!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:44 am
Posts: 1252
CarlosFerreiro wrote:
While it's not the traditional approach, I think stack and reach comparisons make it easier. Depending on the manufacturer's geometry ideas you can easy get their 52, 54 and 56 models with essentially the same reach, just different stacks.....


x10000000000

my crux and my sworks sl3 have the same "effective t-t" 537mm from specialized

but the crux has a stack of almost 25mm higher and reach 10mm shorter than the sworks (making it more upright for me, which is fine for cross). Also* angles make a big difference.... same reach even could be affected by steep or less steep seat tube angles. the smaller seat tube angle (and going up higher) u will go further away from the bars.

cervelo has some nerdy power point presentations on stack and reach.

from what i've seen about cervelo and canyon., they both seem to have a similar "style" in taller headtubes (stack) than their other competitors of the same "sizing"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:02 pm
Posts: 61
@Valy:
They have different seat tube angles, so with the same saddle/seatpost setup you'll have less setback from the bb to the saddle on the 58.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 2527
If you're comparing the manufacturer's reach value, then the STA has no relevance at all, in the fit comparison of two frames. Of course steeper STA's require more seatpost setback, or at least require the saddle to be moved further back, to get the same saddle position, relative to the BB.

If two frames have the same reach, but different stacks, then the reach should be corrected to the same stack height on both frames, for a proper reach comparison. You would subtract 3mm of reach for each 10mm of stack height difference, from the reach of the smaller frame.

Of course a smaller frame with less stack could be setup with a lower bar, but most comparisons are made, assuming that the fit is intended to be the same on both frames.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:02 pm
Posts: 61
But if you're comparing the overall geometry then sta is very relevant. Especially if you prefer to ride slack sta with setback seat post or steep sta with straight seat post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 2527
If the STA differs significantly, then apply the formula (cosA-cosB) x saddle rail height to get the difference in the setback required. This calculation is only used for selecting a seatpost, since reach comparisons are not affected by the STA.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:20 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 7:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:02 pm
Posts: 61
Sure. I understand that reach and sta has nothing to do with each other.

But if you ride a 75 degree sta combined with no set-back seatpost or 73 degree sta with a seatpost with lots of setback it'll be difficult for you to get the same position on a 74 degree sta. So sta is something that should be considered when comparing geometries.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluesea, goatliver, jpanspac, tinozee, ToffieBoi and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help deciphering stack and reach for frames?

in Road

SolidSnake03

11

808

Wed Oct 09, 2013 4:40 pm

WMW View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2008 Fuji SL1 reach question

in Road

digitalnorbs

5

511

Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:56 pm

roadytracky View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Longest Reach - Aluminum Handlebars.

in Road

odin99

6

578

Fri Sep 13, 2013 1:17 am

bricky21 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help understand geometry reach and stack

in Road

blantonator

5

839

Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:55 am

cyclenutnz View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp Service Course SL TB Bars, Reach as Published? 

in Road

tokyoturtle

1

508

Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:54 am

bricky21 View the latest post


It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:28 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB