Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sun Aug 28, 2016 10:19 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:03 am
Posts: 316
Location: Madison, WI USA
Like lots of people here, I've been using the Kinlin XR-300 as a go-to clincher rim. The last one I built up, in 2009, weighed in at 468 grams. I've seen various specs that list the weight as 465 grams, so this one was exactly what I expected.

I just purchased a new XR-300, plopped it on the same scale and got a weight of 450 grams. This is interesting because successive rims of a given make and model typically get sequentially heavier; the extrusion die wears and wall thicknesses increase incrementally with each rim's worth of extrusion.

The most logical conclusion to be reached is that Kinlin is being fairly aggressive about replacing its extrusion dies (which is good news for weight weenies). For what it's worth, both my 2009 rim and my 2012 rim are black (powdercoated) with a machined brake track. The 2009 rim has 24 holes and the 2012 rim has 20.

This brings me to another oddity about these rims: every single one I've ever encountered has a slightly sharper radius on one side of the spoke bed than the other. I'm referring to the external radius nearest the spoke nipples...essentially, the bottom of the V in a V-section rim. This isn't something I can see, but it's easy to feel when you run your hand around the outside of the rim (its minor diameter, if you will).

None of this is earth-shaking, but I thought some people here might be interested.

Cheers,

Jason


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:59 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Posts: 847
Location: Ruidoso, NM
Kinlin is much better than some manufacturers at keeping weights in a pretty narrow range.

_________________
formerly rruff...


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:01 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:27 am
Posts: 1244
Location: McCall, ID
WMW wrote:
Kinlin is much better than some manufacturers at keeping weights in a pretty narrow range.


Truth to that. I weighed an A23 the other day that came in almost 50 grams over quoted weight. :roll:

_________________
http://www.zencyclery.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:03 am
Posts: 316
Location: Madison, WI USA
Thanks for the confirmation. Both of you guys see way more rims from more manufacturers than I ever will. Have you ever noticed the weird asymmetry I mentioned in the XR-300? Any ideas about how it got there?

Cheers,

Jason


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:10 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Posts: 847
Location: Ruidoso, NM
No I haven't noticed any asymmetry... but I don't use the XR300 much anymore... prefer the XR270 and the XC279.

_________________
formerly rruff...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:07 pm
Posts: 1043
Location: Slovenia---that forest land
as i get XR300 are very close in weight - 460g.
XR200 vary a lot (365-395g)
Black colour rims (white are heavier)

I get one Xr300 with 0,7mm vary in width (18,5-9,2mm)- cant use that rim

_________________
http://kavitec.blogspot.com/

click this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0m8maAO-m-w


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:32 pm
Posts: 260
Location: S.E. TN
Powdercoated? Shouldn't the black one's be anodized?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:03 am
Posts: 316
Location: Madison, WI USA
I wish they were anodized...If my name were Jason Kinlin, I'd bead blast the rims and then anodize them black. But I'm not.

I've never seen a "stock" XR-300 that was anodized. I've seen a few that were anodized locally, but they didn't come from the factory that way.

Cheers,

Jason


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Helmets . whats the point. New study

[ Go to page: 13 4 5 6 7 ]

in Road

xena

93

5772

Mon Jul 11, 2016 4:46 pm

ms6073 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Deda Superlegerra bars centre point not central??

in Road

cmcdonnell

5

589

Mon Sep 28, 2015 1:36 am

AJS914 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. stem spacer weights: FSA carbon vs. Point 1 Racing aluminum

in Road

CAAD997

4

523

Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:26 pm

chris14 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Campy EPS transmitting its data wirelessly...

in Road

2old4this

8

702

Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:08 pm

userfriendly View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. srm pc7 unable to download ride data

in Road

sungod

4

128

Fri Apr 15, 2016 4:05 pm

sungod View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], fletch62, hamd, kgt, MSNbot Media and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited