$/gr average?

Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please

Moderators: robbosmans, Moderator Team

rruff
Shop Owner
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:12 am
Location: Alto, NM

by rruff

elviento wrote:It seems $10/g is more like the rule today... any thoughts?


You should have an incredibly light bike with that rule...

The $/g changes hugely as you move down in weight, and it is good to pick the low hanging fruit first. $1/g with no downside is a no brainier. Unfortunately you will quickly get to the point where there usually is a loss of function, durability, and maybe aesthetics... as well as a price increase... so there are a lot of variables to juggle.

Camilo
Posts: 355
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:31 pm

by Camilo

depends on where you are to start with.

I went from about 21 lbs to about 17+ lbs (pedals included) for between $.50 and $1.00 per gram, closer to $.50 on average I'd say (I have a spreadsheet somewere, can't find it right now). It's pretty easy to be economical going from "really heavy" components to "pretty darn light" components. I really think to get from where I am to the magic 15 lb threshhold will be several times X the cost per gram.

It would be a curve for sure, kind of an exponential curve sort of thing I'd guess. At some point you pay a heck of a lot, and sooner or later you really can't get lighter no matter how much you are willing to spend.

edit - found the summary of what I did for cheap - see attached. Over 1600 g. (3.5 lbs) for a little more than $800, all excellent parts, $.50 per gram. But without changing groupset and frame ($$$), I'm stuck and don't plan to go further for now.
bike upgrade summary.jpg

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
Discoverspeed
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:20 am

by Discoverspeed

My own experience with a couple of weight weenie builds is that there really is no rule of thumb but rule of heart - especially when the bike gets down to sub6/ 5.5kg area. The cost per gram curve shoots up exponentially as you squeeze the miligrams, usually using more exotic stuff. However, once it gets down to sub 5kg territory, you absolutely have to think about rideability/ durability/ am I cuckoo parameters.

Finding the cost per gram beta is not as simple as
Image
Current Bikes: S-Works Venge 7.3kg
Storck F.3 5.5kg
Colnago Concept Art Deco CHDK 7/6.5kg
Collection: Team Ti Raleigh 753 Vintage Campy
Ex: Storck F0.6 Di2 6kg, Storck F0.7IS Di2 4.8kg, Storck Aero2 7.04kg Storck Organic Light 11.1kg

User avatar
range
Shop Owner
Posts: 934
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:24 pm
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Contact:

by range

@Camilo love the chart! Cheers!

Yep, I do agree that it has to do not just with maths, but also with emotions, reliability, and more. Personally, I like the $3.5/gram as a starting point. I agree though that once you start looking at super light parts from AX, Schmolke, and others, you start paying for more.

For example, I was looking for a new set of low weight rims and had selected the Edge 1.25. I didn't like the fact that they cost $750 each. The AX rims are lighter, but at about $900 each, beyond my set budget.

Then, I found some FFWD rims that come to a combined weight of about 480gr. These come sourced from someone I know, and they are quite cheaper than the Edges and weight about 50g more. However, in total, I saved about $1,000 by going with these rims.

Though I do have to say that some of the AX parts are just darn sexy. Some of the Zeus stems that I've seen on WW are just amazing. Nathan's Zeus+Schmolke bar just look great.

That being said, going into the second-hand market is also a good option in order to reduce costs. I'm going to be using this on my WW build.
Range || range.wordpress.com
Asterisk*Cycles
'10 Velocite Millennium Elite SRAM Red
'11 Velocite Geos w SRAM Red || '08 Giant Anthem X0 w SRAM X0 || '93 Pinarello w Shimano 105

austke
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:03 am
Location: Queensland Australia

by austke

So lets have it. What is everyones $/gram ratio working out to roughly, and on what builds.
E.G. $2-3US per gram build for completed bike. Is a 4000gr build setting you back 10k or 20 to build.
Being WW, I am thinking some of us must still factor in a rough budget for a set build weight?
Easy to see the old $1/gr example that I have seen, has grow with inflation. :)
While some parts individually can run to $10/gr, I think I have seen?
Ready set go, dont be shy, lol.

Thanks Austke.
2013 Giant TCR Advanced SL 0, 6.92kg
2013 Giant Defy Composite 2 M, 8.5kg - Wife's
Azzurro Torino 8.55g
Fuji 650 10.8kg
Miele Lupa Triple Tandem 38,89kg

User avatar
sugarkane
in the industry
Posts: 1797
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 am
Location: SYD
Contact:

by sugarkane

5.28kg parlee z5..

2.1$/g

SimonGoesSideways
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:41 pm
Location: Noth London

by SimonGoesSideways

I have only just started my build so I won't know the ratio just yet, however, so far, I have spent £200 and saved 200g.

It also seems to be the case with other stuff I am going to buy, the approx £1/gram is the ratio.

£1 GBP is equiv to about $1.6 USD
Aim : to get a 12.2kg Rockhopper down in the 10's !!

My sloooow weight loss project!

artray
Posts: 1347
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:08 pm

by artray

There is always the odd bargin to be found . I got myself some storck UMS forks for my trek build . They only cost £150. But in most cases the lighter you go the more cash you splash just to get those last few grms.

natiedean24
Posts: 380
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:16 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

by natiedean24

I think that simply taking cost of bike / grams is a useless metric.

If we're talking about $/gram for an upgrade, $3 to $4 per gram or below is reasonable. Above that, I had better be getting something else for my dollars (more comfort, better operation, more aero, etc.)

austke
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:03 am
Location: Queensland Australia

by austke

sugarkane wrote:5.28kg parlee z5..

2.1$/g


Well done, to get into the low 5000gr weight for $2.10/gr.
Or to put it another way, you have a 5.28kg Parlee for about $11,000. That is awesome I think.

Very nice build too, Sugarcane!

Austke.
2013 Giant TCR Advanced SL 0, 6.92kg
2013 Giant Defy Composite 2 M, 8.5kg - Wife's
Azzurro Torino 8.55g
Fuji 650 10.8kg
Miele Lupa Triple Tandem 38,89kg

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7917
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

range wrote:I think that Dj's $3.5/gram is a good benchmark. I don't think it's worth thousands of dollars to go lighter for just a few grams. By being smart, you can cut down a lot of weight.


Thanks.

A corollary is "every gram counts" meaning I'll spend up to $3.50 to save 1 gram, no more than $3500 to save 1 kg. All grams count the same.

Okay, maybe I'll stretch it to $4 in a point of weakness :).

There's other functionality considerations, of course...

User avatar
prendrefeu
Posts: 8580
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: Glendale / Los Angeles, California
Contact:

by prendrefeu

My bike currently weighs 12.47lb (5671g).
The $/g ratio is $0.68/g.
Even if I added $600 brakes to drop a few more grams, added $50 worth in Powercordz to drop more weight, I would only edge up to $0.78/g.
If I switch to tubulars, sub 1000g and drop about 280g including some nice & light tubular tires, bringing it down to 11.94lb/5430g, I'm at $0.70/g.
But, performance wise, the difference between my getting to $3/g and where I am now is not significant enough to justify the switch - at this time.

:twisted:
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.

ticou
Posts: 459
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:31 pm

by ticou

I could go for lighter bottle cages, and a lighter saddle, which would be about a chunk of edam cheese, and I couldn't really go below the mid 1400g's with the wheels, but cages and a saddle are doable.

justkeepedaling
Posts: 1712
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am

by justkeepedaling

Diminishing returns will mean that the average $/g goes up as the build gets more and more extreme

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



kulivontot
Posts: 1163
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm

by kulivontot

I never understood the $/g metric. You want to minimize both, so having a high number is undesirable for cost, but desirable for weight. In my opinion, you should be calculating $ x g. That way you can minimize both. Of course, then you get into components that have the same $g value, but one is cheaper than the other but heavier, but that's exactly the kind of tradeoffs you're supposed to be evaluating!.
$/g only applies for REMOVING weight from a bike. As in, "I'm already 6.8kg and this $100 seatpost will drop 100g, but this $500 brakeset will drop 75g." Here you're trying to maximize g, while minimizing $, both which will lower your $/g ratio.

Post Reply