Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Wed Aug 24, 2016 5:32 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 847
Hi,
So after a ride through the mud last weekend, I decided I'd do a full teardown of my Scott Addict to thoroughly clean and overhaul everything. Once I took the chain and pedals off the bike, I spun the cranks by hand and found that it only seemed to spin maybe twice before stopping. Since I've had the bike for maybe 2 years, I thought maybe it was possible the bearings were shot. It uses a press-fit BB86 version of BB-7900 bottom bracket. I then started working on a time trial project bike of mine and installed a brand new external bearing BB-7900 bottom bracket. After installing the cranks, I spun the cranks by hand and found the same level of drag as my Addict.
Is this amount of drag somehow normal on newer bottom brackets? I have some older bikes using el cheapo square taper cartridge bearing bottom brackets that I can spin the crank for 10-15 revolutions with one push. It seems odd that the drag is so much higher on these Dura Ace BB's. Am I doing something wrong? I tried loosening the pre-load dust cap, but even with just the drive side crank arm on seems to be dragging.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:45 am
Posts: 100
Go find an old steel bike with a loose ball bearing bottom bracket that has been sitting outside for years.
It will spin 50 times with one push. The amount of drag you feel sounds normal.
If while you are pushing it, you hear rumbling or feel grittiness, then it is time to replace it.

_________________
My drawings:
http://www.facebook.com/andrewlivingstonart
My bike:
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=107451


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:20 pm
Posts: 214
It is ok, the BBs have been designed for a long lifetime. It will get better after a few thousand km/miles, but not much.
A BB with less seals would mean they would wear out quicker and that would generate a lot of unsatisfied bike owners and warranty replacements.

_________________
Scott Foil Ultegra Di2
Scott Scale 35 26"
Scott Spark LTD 29" M8000


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 1:37 am
Posts: 80
Location: Sydney
2 revolutions does sound a bit tight tho. my FSA BB (external bearing cups) spins very freely and its just gone 3 yrs old. FWIW, i also removed a UN73 shimano square taper bb last weekend and it spun very freely before i took it out- easily the 10-15 revs you suggest. I know its a different spindle and older bb but still...


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 4033
Location: Natovi Landing
howler wrote:
2 revolutions does sound a bit tight tho. my FSA BB (external bearing cups) spins very freely and its just gone 3 yrs old. FWIW, i also removed a UN73 shimano square taper bb last weekend and it spun very freely before i took it out- easily the 10-15 revs you suggest. I know its a different spindle and older bb but still...


2 revs with DA sounds normal.

square taper don't have the same pre-loading which generates drag. getting the torque right, removing seals, going ceramic, and very easy on the grease will all help, but won't make it square taper.

_________________
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 847
What was the pointing all this BB "innovations" of the last 2 decades if it has 10x more drag than shit from the 70's? Just stiffness? Better seals and durability? Maybe I should just switch to Phil wood.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:20 pm
Posts: 214
The drag is not significant, your tyres rolling resistance is orders of magnitude more.

_________________
Scott Foil Ultegra Di2
Scott Scale 35 26"
Scott Spark LTD 29" M8000


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 847
Omiar wrote:
The drag is not significant, your tyres rolling resistance is orders of magnitude more.

I believe you, but if this is true, why would anybody buy ceramic BB bearings?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:25 pm
Posts: 169
^^
That's an extremely good question.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:48 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
kulivontot wrote:
I believe you, but if this is true, why would anybody buy ceramic BB bearings?

Marketing.

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Last edited by fa63 on Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:50 pm
Posts: 199
"Free spin" is basically meaningless. How the bearings perform under load is far more important. An outboard BB bearing that was optimized for free spin in the stand, wouldn't survive very long out in the real world.

My Dura-Ace BBs spin the same number of revolutions, and I don't worry about it.

_________________
GRAVELBIKE.COM - ride everything


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:31 pm
Posts: 459
Each and every pro that uses DA uses ceramics everywhere-just ask Bradders - and I have definately found a sig improvement using SR ceramics in the jockey wheels. They reduce friction, period. Shimano, being a multi billion dollar company, can't be bothered, thinking no one will notice.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:00 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1980
Location: NoVA/DC
each and every pro that uses ceramics use them for the psychological benefit - period.
when the best of the best ceramic bearings in wheels save a maximum of 3seconds over 40k, it's predominantly in your head. derailleur pulleys? please. theyre loaded with only pulley cage tension.
the whole notion of using ceramic bearings in bicycles started off as a silly "show special", or something along those lines. it was never meant to be taken seriously.
but like anything, if a pro knows that the guy next to you has any sort of "advantage", it'll just gnaw at you.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:51 am
Posts: 1855
As pointed out, how well the bearings spin without load on the stand is moot ... pointless. What matters is how well the bearings spin under load.

Bearings under load will deform. Be it the race or the balls.

A well designed and applied bearing will be preloaded such that it deforms to its optimum dimensions under its designed load.
The reverse is true too.

Same thing applies for wheels and BB bearings. If you want to check how well they roll, you need to load them.

For wheels, if you spin the wheels on the stand and compared to if you straddle the bike and roll it down a long gentle hill with them, their performances will most likely NOT be the same.

For BB bearings, if you can, mount about 70kg worth of weights equally between the 2 sides (35kg / 35kg) on weight discs and spin them from there. How well they spin would then be the 'real world' result.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:31 pm
Posts: 459
Certainly I haven't gone the full ceramic route, Campy's steel bearings being of such high quality as it is. But it's not in my head that the jockey's have made a real difference, in real world conditions, esp under stress going up inclines.I'm not going to CULT me BB anytime soon, however, and there we are in accord.

We can certainly argue that top ceramics/steel bearings in the wheels make a difference, and I'm kicking myself a little that I didn't fit either record hubs or Zonda's instead of sludgy Elites. One ceramic front wheel spun for 12 mins with a 3 mph push, and yes, the owner did see a real world difference.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. What bottom bracket do I have?

in Road

G6612

3

356

Thu May 05, 2016 8:58 pm

Calnago View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Which GXP bottom bracket?

in Road

cnyn

8

621

Wed May 11, 2016 6:44 pm

topflightpro View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Need help on bottom bracket

in Road

poppiholla

3

393

Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:38 pm

poppiholla View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. C60 bottom bracket removal

in Road

markyboy

4

289

Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:56 am

ianSWBB View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Colnago v1-r bottom bracket

in Road

pdiomidis

8

466

Sun Jul 10, 2016 3:01 pm

corky View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 11.4, Bing [Bot], corky, Yahoo [Bot] and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited