HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:46 pm
Posts: 276
Location: Amsterdam
Has anyone tried to match the new dura ace 9000 fd to a sram force groupset?

The long arm and low weight seem like a two in one upgrade

thanks in advance...


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:54 pm 
  • 14.90 € (including 19% VAT)
  • 60 components


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:41 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:17 am
Posts: 341
Location: Greenville, SC USA
Hopefully it's at least going to work with 7900.

I got to ride the new group this week and the front shifting is best on the market for mechanical. No questions about that.

Image

_________________
Blog: http://glorycycles.blogspot.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/glorycycles/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1530
Location: Houston, Texas
Unless I leave a bit of slack in the cable to the front deraileur on her road bike, the wife has a heck of time shifting into the big ring with 7900 and I have yet to figure out the setup for 7900 for her to get successful front shifts on her cross bike!
cwdzoot wrote:
Hopefully it's at least going to work with 7900.

Assuming you meant the 9000 front deraileur with 7900 shifters, anbyone know if shifting improvements are due only to the longer lever arm of the 9000 front mech or is the imrpovement require both the 9000 shifter and front deraileur?

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:43 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1965
Location: NoVA/DC
Theres no way the 9000 fd will work with older systems, unless they carefully matched the arm length/pinch bolt placement to allow you to run the cable under the pinch bolt instead of over it. But then, what's the point?
As far as needing to leave slack in the fd cable on 7900, yes, you have to do that, esp if youre using non-shimano cranks. Thats just how it is, nothing wrong with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 106
Location: Honolulu
cwdzoot wrote:
Hopefully it's at least going to work with 7900.

I got to ride the new group this week and the front shifting is best on the market for mechanical. No questions about that.

Image




The crank looks more businesslike from that angle than earlier preview shots. No complaints here, visually.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1530
Location: Houston, Texas
thisisatest wrote:
unless they carefully matched the arm length/pinch bolt placement to allow you to run the cable under the pinch bolt instead of over it.
Sorry, not following. From the image above, it looks to me as if the lever arm on the derailleur is a bit 'taller' than for 7900 but I dont see why that would require a different cable routing for the pinch bolt.

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:53 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 1329
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
I like those new cranks visually, never like the last generation of shimano cranks.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 2:01 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1965
Location: NoVA/DC
ms6073 wrote:
thisisatest wrote:
unless they carefully matched the arm length/pinch bolt placement to allow you to run the cable under the pinch bolt instead of over it.
Sorry, not following. From the image above, it looks to me as if the lever arm on the derailleur is a bit 'taller' than for 7900 but I dont see why that would require a different cable routing for the pinch bolt.

to effectively shorten the arm. it's a common trick when trying to match up, say, a road shifter with a mtb front derailleur. normally the shifter would not move the der far enough.
just looked at the pic more closely, interesting that it looks like the fd cable does go under the pinch bolt as it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 1:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:46 pm
Posts: 276
Location: Amsterdam
If it works for 7900 it will also work for sram force right?

I couldn't find a compatibility charge for 7900 and 9000.

Otherwise i will try the new sram red fd


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 2:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:39 pm
Posts: 366
Location: DC
TimmS wrote:
Has anyone tried to match the new dura ace 9000 fd to a sram force groupset?

The long arm and low weight seem like a two in one upgrade

thanks in advance...


Why not try the new Sram RED Yaw FD since you're running a Sram group set. I have it set up with the original Force shifters on a force crank with Rotor q rings and shifting is perfect.

_________________
My Bikes:
BMC SLR01 TeamMachine
Cannondale CAAD8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:46 pm
Posts: 276
Location: Amsterdam
I was planning to give the new red a try which is a little porky, then I saw the weight of de 9000 fd at 66gr claimed, afterall this is weightweenies...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1530
Location: Houston, Texas
thisisatest wrote:
to effectively shorten the arm. it's a common trick when trying to match up, say, a road shifter with a mtb front derailleur. normally the shifter would not move the der far enough.
Sort of topic drift but intrigued by the descriptions of effortless shiting, over the weekend, I modified a Speen Umlenker 7800 so that instead of converting from a bottom pull, it effectively increased the length of the arm on the 7900 front deraileur on the wife's cross bike. While it took some 'fine tuning' with a flat file to get it right, my wife can now shift the Wickwerks 44/34 chainrings like butter.

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:23 pm
Posts: 54
Is the Sram RED Yaw FD compatible with Dura-Ace 7800 shifters and 7900 compact crank?

I have had problems with my 7800 FD ever since I added a 7900 compact crank, it was supposed to be compatible but it has been a dropped chain nightmare.

From what I can tell the 9000 FD is not compatible?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:19 am
Posts: 817
Agreed on that crank looking much improved. I never cared for the 7900.

TimmS wrote:
I was planning to give the new red a try which is a little porky, then I saw the weight of de 9000 fd at 66gr claimed, afterall this is weightweenies...


Image

:noidea:


I'd still run the YAW FD if it weighed a pound... this thing performs fantastic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:28 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1965
Location: NoVA/DC
v70cat wrote:
Is the Sram RED Yaw FD compatible with Dura-Ace 7800 shifters and 7900 compact crank?

I have had problems with my 7800 FD ever since I added a 7900 compact crank, it was supposed to be compatible but it has been a dropped chain nightmare.

From what I can tell the 9000 FD is not compatible?

7800 fd with 7800 shifters is not compatible with 7900 cranks. in general, the derailleur wont move far enough to get the chain to the large ring. there will be rubbing in the hardest gears in the big ring and/or in the easiest gears in the small ring.

this chart does not list 7800, but does still list 5600 (105). it shows that 5600 is compatible with 7900 front derailleurs (but not the other way around) and 5600 is compatible with 7901 chains. that's basically the extent of cross compatibility for the front shift systems.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:28 am 
  • 14.90 € (including 19% VAT)
  • 60 components


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: boots2000, chalkie, Google [Bot], stuka666 and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 9000 and 6800 compatibility

in Road

myndog

4

561

Mon May 05, 2014 3:34 am

petal666 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. DURA ACE 9000 OR ROTOR

in Road

treetrees

10

2635

Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:10 am

maquisard View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura Ace 9000 changes to 9001

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

in Road

NYCPrynne

65

19487

Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:58 pm

Grill View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura Ace 9000 Chainring Sizes

in Road

JimmyRingo

12

1028

Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:29 pm

06SpiceRed View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura-Ace 9000 FD shifting pattern

in Road

wca9922

5

1030

Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:28 am

TheDarkInstall View the latest post


It is currently Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:30 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB