Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:47 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 3:08 am
Posts: 323
Location: Milton, Canada
I agree with changing up the rim to something lower profile and maybe not carbon.

Another hub to consider (absolutely love these on my track bike): White Industries. They have a flip flop version too, and use a spline interface for the track cogs, works really well. No idea how the weight compares to Phil Wood though. They are beautiful:

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:45 am
Posts: 100
Just one Phil Wood rear hub is almost 100g more than the White Ind. (Depending on the model)
White Ind. track hubs are claimed at 298g

_________________
My drawings:
http://www.facebook.com/andrewlivingstonart
My bike:
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=107451


Top
   
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:36 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 33
Werdna wrote:
It will be tough to find a rear track hub that is light. I have AM Classic hubs on my Fixed road bike.


Hence the reasoning behind going for a light weight MTB front hub and using a custom axle and bolt on cog.

If you're using it around town then I think clinchers are a sensible move so Stan 340's probably make a lot of sense.

Still think if you're riding with your kids something slow and comfortable is the way to go.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 33
The vigoreli looks good.

Much prefer the black to the other colours.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:04 am
Posts: 114
serbelo wrote:
What will your gearing be?

thinking 49-18


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:29 pm
Posts: 877
Location: UK
You won’t be winning any sprint’s with that gear ratio! :wink:

Looks like a very nice top end urban build, but I agree with others that alu rims would be more in keeping with the look (and will also brake better in the wet, and are less likely to squeal like a bag full of ferrets). Clinchers would make most practical sense.

Oh and re hubs, I belive Paul's flip-flop is in the 290g range which would be a little lighter than Phil's

_________________
"We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities." Oscar Wilde

Pegoretti Responsorium, Parlee Z5i, Donhou Commuter, 1946 MacLeans Featherweight L'Eroica!, 2 'dales SM1000 and Habit SE


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:45 am
Posts: 100
Pauls website claims 290, but then they have a hub spec chart claiming 247 w/ bolts and washers. At that weight it is lighter than the AC hub I have. One thing to remember though is you can save 50-60 grams on cog+lockring weight by using aluminum.
Oh yeah, and push a harder gear. I started at 48-16,
now I'm riding 53-14. Of course I'm not making it up the 20%+ grades but for anything else it suits me just fine.

_________________
My drawings:
http://www.facebook.com/andrewlivingstonart
My bike:
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=107451


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:04 am
Posts: 114
Are the Paul's as nice a the Phil's?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:31 pm
Posts: 459
When I'm bimbling ( easy riding) about on mah steel I use a 50x15/16-either or-and it will get up 6% slopes very nicely. Or slightly more. If your getting a sig lighter bike you might go down to 14 or poss 13.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. help building up a single speed bike

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

atlasspeaks

25

1444

Wed Nov 09, 2016 6:55 pm

bremerradkurier View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Help building my son a racing bike

in Road

CanadianBiker

12

691

Mon Jun 20, 2016 3:51 pm

CanadianBiker View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Suggestions for building my new Scott Foil 2015 Team bike

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

holmez

19

1153

Sat Apr 30, 2016 7:33 pm

muntos View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Brake squeal slowing down from higher speed, but works fine with slower speed.

in Road

stockae92

2

254

Mon Jun 27, 2016 5:40 pm

Calnago View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Campagnolo 11 speed crank w/ 9 speed chain Compatability

in Road

rgamble

6

431

Fri Oct 28, 2016 9:09 am

icenutter View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], dynaserve, Google [Bot], incredibleting, MSNbot Media, PSJoyce and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited