Titanium external cam skewers

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

refthimos
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:02 pm

by refthimos

I know I might get my WW card revoked for saying this, but I no longer ride ti skewers - I want my wheels as stiff as possible, and I want my wheels clamped down as securely as possible. So all I use now are DT Swiss RWS skewers - steel with aluminum lever. Front weighs 51g and rear comes in at 55g. Nothing clamps as strongly as these suckers.

Image

Image
EVO1 | 5.37kg
EVO3 (sold) | 6.51kg
EVO4 | build thread coming soon
S5 Disc
SystemSix (sold) | 8.01kg
P5 Disc | heavy but fast

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



VTBike
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 8:14 pm

by VTBike

I'm using Tune Dc-14's and love them. I'm 200 lbs, ride out of the saddle often, and am on non-stop large hills here in VT. The only issue I have is that I need to make sure the rear wheel is tight in the drop-out before every ride. On a couple rare occasions, the rear wheel has shifted ever so slightly - just enough for me to notice a decrease in shifting crispness. But checking the QR before every ride is no big deal to me. I feel no real flex; and certainly I'm not having the wheels rub the brakes at any point in time. Unlike other super lightweight QR's which you may have to be careful with the amount of force you clamp down with - Tune states in the instructions that you may clamp down as hard as your heart desires - and that the skewer can take it..!

User avatar
saroadie
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 9:43 am
Location: Adelaide

by saroadie

I've found a happy "middle ground" with Tune AC14 skewers. At 48g you're only taking a tiny 15g hit over the DC14s but gaining an internal cam clamping mechanism (like Shimano/Campy) which holds the wheels in very securely. I am 220lb and race and train on these with no issues.

IME the internal clamping mechanism is much more reliable and consistent than the external mechanism of the POP or tune DC14. I broke a POP external clamp trying to get decent clamping force. No issues with the AC14, over 10000km trouble free. The wheels never move no matter how hard I ride/corner. As VTBike indicates, I too noticed the rear wheel could move slightly sometimes when using external mechanism shewers. With the AC14s, the clamping force is maintained until you release it. I have checked many times and there is no loss of force with use.
"Bite off more than you can chew, then chew like hell." Peter Brock.

rustychain
Posts: 3907
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 11:42 pm
Location: lat 38.9677 lon 77.3366
Contact:

by rustychain

Even at my weight I have had no issues for the last 5 years using skewers as light as 48 grams for the pair. They are perhaps a bit more fussy in use. These days I mostly just use the Campy skewers, my average speed has not gone down BTW :shock:
WW Velocipedist Gargantuan

NiFTY
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:26 pm

by NiFTY

So are people complaining about the cam design of lightweight skewers causing the rear wheel to move relative to the dropout under load or flex in the ti axle causing the wheel to move relative to the dropout under load?
Evo 4.9kg SL3 6.64kg Slice RS 8.89kg viewtopic.php?f=10&t=110579" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

LionelB
Posts: 1595
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:09 pm
Location: Aix en Provence

by LionelB

Campy skewers for me too. I like a solid connection in that spot.

runningrunningjump
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:43 pm

by runningrunningjump

I've run most decent QRs. never had any problems.

I currently have a pair of mt zoom ti and a pair of kcnc ti on road and MTb and had no problems at all. If the QR doesn't have a cam, then you need to tighten them up a little more.

Really quite supprised there is some much negative about light QR, unless in general either I always do my QRs up too tight, or those that have experienced problems have in general not been doing theirs up enough.....

User avatar
Horizons
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:45 pm

by Horizons

I wanted to order some titanium ENVE skewers (steel is not available), but after reading something about titanium rods stretching very easily and external cam skewers not clamping as good as internal ones.. are 'fancy' skewers worth it? or should i just check my lbs for some Shimano skewers which have always worked fine. Zipp (steel) skewers are easily available as well but are external.

Couldn't find any threat regarding this.

eric
Posts: 2196
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
Contact:

by eric

Depends on your needs. And on the skewers. I have used both internal and external cam skewers that did not work very well. But the external cam design tends to make skewers that don't clamp as well as internal cam.

I've not noticed any of my Ti skewers stretching.

I've had good luck with Kcnc Ti external cam skewers. But the levers on those are short so you need to keep that in mind and really crank them down. I've also had some Chinese external cam Ti skewers work well... and some not so well.

But if it's not a WW bike, Dura Ace skewers are the gold standard. Heavier than the WW skewers but they do clamp well.

kode54
Posts: 3749
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 9:39 pm

by kode54

i have Enve skewers on both bikes with no noticeable stretching on titanium rods. besides, i take my wheel off and on all the time and readjust tightness then, so no issues.
- Factor Ostro VAM Disc
- Factor LS Disc
- Specialized Aethos Disc
- Sturdy Ti Allroad Disc
- Guru Praemio R Disc

charirider
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2021 3:00 am

by charirider

refthimos wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:32 am
I know I might get my WW card revoked for saying this, but I no longer ride ti skewers - I want my wheels as stiff as possible, and I want my wheels clamped down as securely as possible. So all I use now are DT Swiss RWS skewers - steel with aluminum lever. Front weighs 51g and rear comes in at 55g. Nothing clamps as strongly as these suckers.

Image

Image
Second this.
I tried multiple QRs: Reynolds, Zipp steel/titan, Vision, DA 9000, Mavic steel, Cannondale Hollowgram and bunch of others;
they all don't come even close to sequrity and ease if use of RWS.
They just work, never came loose, never creak, always easy to center (no need to adjust brakes). And if you climb a lot you'll feel difference in stiffness. The ultimate axle for road bike with traditional dropouts, rim or disc.
Weight was dead on 100g so much lighter than DA also.
Last edited by charirider on Tue Jul 25, 2023 1:08 am, edited 3 times in total.
2018 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2 rim size 56 (raw stripped) 6.9kg
2014 Bridgestone Anchor CX6 Equipe size 55 (cyclocross) 9.8kg

charirider
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2021 3:00 am

by charirider

refthimos wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:32 am
I know I might get my WW card revoked for saying this, but I no longer ride ti skewers - I want my wheels as stiff as possible, and I want my wheels clamped down as securely as possible. So all I use now are DT Swiss RWS skewers - steel with aluminum lever. Front weighs 51g and rear comes in at 55g. Nothing clamps as strongly as these suckers.

Image

Image
Second this.
I tried multiple QRs: Reynolds, Zipp steel/titan, Vision, DA 9000, Mavic steel, Cannondale Hollowgram and bunch of others;
they all don't come even close to sequrity and ease if use of RWS.
They just work, never came loose, never creak, always easy to center (no need to adjust brakes). And if you climb a lot you'll feel difference in stiffness. The ultimate axle for road bike with traditional dropouts, rim or disc.
Weight was dead on 100g so much lighter than DA also.
2018 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2 rim size 56 (raw stripped) 6.9kg
2014 Bridgestone Anchor CX6 Equipe size 55 (cyclocross) 9.8kg

User avatar
nickf
Posts: 1428
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:34 pm

by nickf

This thread brought back from the dead got my attention. I put on some heavy steel internal cam skewers, I felt zero difference. Put my generic Farsports ti skewers back on.

User avatar
wheelsONfire
Posts: 6283
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
Location: NorthEU

by wheelsONfire

charirider wrote:
Tue Jul 25, 2023 1:04 am
refthimos wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:32 am
I know I might get my WW card revoked for saying this, but I no longer ride ti skewers - I want my wheels as stiff as possible, and I want my wheels clamped down as securely as possible. So all I use now are DT Swiss RWS skewers - steel with aluminum lever. Front weighs 51g and rear comes in at 55g. Nothing clamps as strongly as these suckers.

Image

Image
Second this.
I tried multiple QRs: Reynolds, Zipp steel/titan, Vision, DA 9000, Mavic steel, Cannondale Hollowgram and bunch of others;
they all don't come even close to sequrity and ease if use of RWS.
They just work, never came loose, never creak, always easy to center (no need to adjust brakes). And if you climb a lot you'll feel difference in stiffness. The ultimate axle for road bike with traditional dropouts, rim or disc.
Weight was dead on 100g so much lighter than DA also.
Then again there's the ti version of RWS, at *2 the price. Do you think you could tell them apart (Steel VS Ti RWS) in a blind test?
Bikes:

Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)


Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.

charirider
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2021 3:00 am

by charirider

No, I can't. It is 10g weight difference, though... for double the price I'll be ok with steel ones;)
2018 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2 rim size 56 (raw stripped) 6.9kg
2014 Bridgestone Anchor CX6 Equipe size 55 (cyclocross) 9.8kg

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply