Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Tue Sep 26, 2017 8:45 am

Unanswered topics | Active topics


» »

All times are UTC+01:00

Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
pholcus
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 47
http://www.bikeradar.com/road/news/arti ... res-34317/

Seems like good news :beerchug:
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Weenie
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:15 pm 


Top
   
 
spytech
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: New York City
indeed. i wonder how the puncture protection is with these, compared to a gp4000s.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
aaric
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 432
If you're already running sealant, would it matter?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
spytech
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: New York City
i would not deal with the mess. so i would not be running sealant, and sealant is not needed to work - so i would not already be running sealant. it is the reason i ask about puncture protection with these tires. i cant remember in the last 3 years when i got a flat on gp4000s, if these are as good then it would be a plus.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
getting dropped
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:18 am
Posts: 66
Can't wait to get a set...Atom Galactik - interesting name. The article also claims that it is outperforming their protour tubular, I hope that means lower crr.

Also looking forward to trying the 28c Intensive - seems like a good choice for our tandem. I don't want to think about punctures on the tandem...
Top
   
Reply with quote  
russianbear
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:40 am
Posts: 747
spytech wrote:

i would not deal with the mess. so i would not be running sealant, and sealant is not needed to work - so i would not already be running sealant. it is the reason i ask about puncture protection with these tires. i cant remember in the last 3 years when i got a flat on gp4000s, if these are as good then it would be a plus.


I thought you had to run the sealant otherwise you can't inflate the tire? Otherwise, there are too many gaps when there's 0 air in the tire.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
spytech
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: New York City
Hutchinson’s Galactik is full tubeless, so it doesn’t require sealant, which is the tire i am commenting about. tubeless ready requires you to use a sealant.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
aaric
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 432
russianbear wrote:
I thought you had to run the sealant otherwise you can't inflate the tire? Otherwise, there are too many gaps when there's 0 air in the tire.


Really depends on the rim and tire. A clean tubeless Shimano rim with a new tire in my experience works fine without sealant. A converted rim, less so. If your tires are older, and/or have been pulled off the rim to patch, it's a bit of a pain to get them to seat properly without sealant.


Last edited by aaric on Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
Reply with quote  
aaric
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 432
spytech wrote:
i would not deal with the mess. so i would not be running sealant, and sealant is not needed to work - so i would not already be running sealant. it is the reason i ask about puncture protection with these tires. i cant remember in the last 3 years when i got a flat on gp4000s, if these are as good then it would be a plus.


I'd be very pleasantly surprised if they could manage to do better than the GP4000s while being much lighter, and better rolling. I was thinking with sealant they'd be in the range of a lightweight/race set of tires/tubes, and less prone to deflation.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
thisisatest
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:48 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1980
Location: NoVA/DC
i just hope they didnt get it down to 245g by making it 18mm wide. it sometimes seems they think if they label a tire 23c, then it is, even when its not.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
kulivontot
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Posts: 1147
What's the point of running tubeless without sealant? Just for ride quality? I'd be super sketched about rolling the tire in a corner and burping the air instantly. I realize there's already a thread debating this.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
spytech
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 1693
Location: New York City
good point, you got me thinking on that. i guess ill stick to clinchers. but i am considering tubulars.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
leosantos
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:41 pm
Posts: 115
i know it's the same weight in the end but I could try not running with sealant on my next setup and instead carry a vittoria pit stop or similar if Im going for a longer ride.. just because if Im going to a road I know is in super good condition, or a short workout close to home, i might prefer the hollow feel and "rim" weight savings
Top
   
Reply with quote  
petromyzon
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:14 pm
Posts: 251
Very doubtful that a pitstop can would be able to seat a tubeless tire (would love to be proved wrong if someone has done it). I've never managed to seat a tire with CO2 that I couldn't seat with a floor pump......
Top
   
Reply with quote  
CTracer
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:07 pm
Posts: 23
If it's the same width as the current Atom, it will be well under 23mm, which is too narrow. Otherwise, I have had pretty good luck with the Atoms as fas as durability and the ride is nice. I just prefer a wider tire (at least a true 23 mm).
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Weenie
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:33 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Non tubeless set up tubeless

in Road

lactatehate

12

1038

Tue Sep 05, 2017 4:14 pm

WinterRider View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Tubular vs Tubeless?

in Road

JimV

2

315

Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:40 am

boysa View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Consider this switching to Tubeless

in Road

3Pio

12

1718

Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:31 am

Fixie82 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Tubeless tire questions

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]

in Road

eyedrop

76

3684

Sat Sep 09, 2017 11:30 am

jlok View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. LW MEILENSTEIN CLINCHER - TUBELESS?

in Road

rafaelblu

0

564

Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:01 pm

rafaelblu View the latest post


» »

All times are UTC+01:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], beeatnik, cyclenutnz, Delorre, erik$, keith and 39 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited