HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 1:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2472
I knew it!

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/05/ ... ter_220429

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 1:01 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 4:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 5:06 am
Posts: 507
Good one. Loved the response to letter below as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 5:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5088
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
Top of the line “lightweight” carbon fiber bike is say 17 pounds? I guess that dude doesn't read WW very much.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 3:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:23 am
Posts: 655
Location: so. cal.
that ingeniero miguel made me laugh 30 pound bike vs 17 obvious difference. now a 15 pound bike vs a 13 pound bike starts getting into the diminishing returns territory. the question is: don't engineers study physics as part of their majors?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5088
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
roca rule wrote:
that ingeniero miguel made me laugh 30 pound bike vs 17 obvious difference. now a 15 pound bike vs a 13 pound bike starts getting into the diminishing returns territory. the question is: don't engineers study physics as part of their majors?
Most of them study physics for engineers, not physics for physicists. At top echelon schools in the honors courses, there's a difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 3:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2472
My 8 year old is in second grade. Even he knows that he climbs faster on a lighter bike... all other things being equal.

_________________
TED
Schoorl, Noord-Holland, Nederland
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 4:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 5:06 am
Posts: 507
HammerTime2 wrote:
roca rule wrote:
that ingeniero miguel made me laugh 30 pound bike vs 17 obvious difference. now a 15 pound bike vs a 13 pound bike starts getting into the diminishing returns territory. the question is: don't engineers study physics as part of their majors?
Most of them study physics for engineers, not physics for physicists. At top echelon schools in the honors courses, there's a difference.



What??? LOL


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 148
That article states nothing other than the obvious.

"Weight Drag" seriously?

According to that article "weight drag" goes up with the incline. So on a flat there is no "weight drag." The total so called weight drag is simply the work done against gravity which happens on an incline.

You expect better from a frame builder, who really is expected to be a technical artisan.

A more interesting question is what happens on the flats. We know a lighter bike is advantageous when the road goes up. But what about on the flat? On the flat there is no work done against gravity. So, ideally, there is no difference between a light and a heavy bike on the flat. However acceleration matters and 2nd law of motion exemplifies the linear reciprocal relation between acceleration and mass (weight) for a given input from the rider.
Basically a bike twice as light (10lb vs 20lb) will accelerate twice as fast. A 15lb bike will accelerate only 1.3 times faster compared to a 20lb bike. It's only a LINEAR relation! Sorry to disappoint.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:49 pm
Posts: 125
What about acceleration up a hill? :noidea:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 148
That's a straightforward argument too. You also take the component of the work done against gravity into account. Short of giving a few figures, the benefits of a light bike are well known when the road goes up. But tell me how steep you want to go? Alpe'Huez, Galibier, which sections?
On the flats a case in point had to be established.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5088
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
Arky wrote:
HammerTime2 wrote:
roca rule wrote:
that ingeniero miguel made me laugh 30 pound bike vs 17 obvious difference. now a 15 pound bike vs a 13 pound bike starts getting into the diminishing returns territory. the question is: don't engineers study physics as part of their majors?
Most of them study physics for engineers, not physics for physicists. At top echelon schools in the honors courses, there's a difference.



What??? LOL

Physics for Engineers is generally a "baby" course compared to Physics for Physics/Math majors. Physics for Biology/Pre-Med is even more watered-down than Physics for Engineers. And then Physics for Poets is even more watered down than that. Some schools even have an Astronomy in effect for basket-weavers/video-game players/potheads which is even lower than Physics for Poets.

You reminded me of one of my math classes at school. There was this student in a hard core math class (for math majors) and he was one of the top students in the class. He was a EE major. As I used to say, he's EE* but he's good in math. This of course flies in the face of the popular misconception prevalent among laypeople that engineers are good at math.

* actually I said "he's 6-1, but he's good in math", and those in the know, will know what that means


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:24 pm
Posts: 4391
Location: BELGIUM
horse wrote:
Basically a bike twice as light (10lb vs 20lb) will accelerate twice as fast. A 15lb bike will accelerate only 1.3 times faster compared to a 20lb bike. It's only a LINEAR relation! Sorry to disappoint.


Not the rider+bike.

Hamm: I guess you don't know there are different kind of engineers. Also, most specialize later on in their profession. If I were you, I would refrain from making blanket statements if you are neither a engineer or a physicist.

_________________
Latest ride - Bianchi Infinito CV


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 11:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 148
You are correct. The rider+bike is what really counts and would make even less of a difference between a light and heavy bike. Not looking too promising with a WW bike is it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 27
Location: Toano, VA
HammerTime2 wrote:
roca rule wrote:
that ingeniero miguel made me laugh 30 pound bike vs 17 obvious difference. now a 15 pound bike vs a 13 pound bike starts getting into the diminishing returns territory. the question is: don't engineers study physics as part of their majors?
Most of them study physics for engineers, not physics for physicists. At top echelon schools in the honors courses, there's a difference.


you pompous a-hole - I'll stack my engineering education against anything you have any damned day. Yes, there is a difference. Oh yeah I am from a top-echelon school but I don't rely on that when I pat myself on the back. I use the fact that I have numerous government (US) and commercial aerospace customers who love and are exceptionally happy with my engineering knowledge of physics and related areas.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3330
Location: Natovi Landing
strobbekoen wrote:
horse wrote:
Basically a bike twice as light (10lb vs 20lb) will accelerate twice as fast. A 15lb bike will accelerate only 1.3 times faster compared to a 20lb bike. It's only a LINEAR relation! Sorry to disappoint.


Not the rider+bike.

Hamm: I guess you don't know there are different kind of engineers. Also, most specialize later on in their profession. If I were you, I would refrain from making blanket statements if you are neither a engineer or a physicist.



Yes, and aerodynamics aren't impacted by weight ...


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:04 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Are there other weight weenie forums?

in MTB

nrsnow

2

895

Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:52 pm

cerro View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Old School Weight Weenie

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

01Erion

21

3254

Fri Jan 10, 2014 4:38 pm

CBJ View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Weight Weenie Project

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

DaveLeeNC

19

1731

Sun Jul 27, 2014 11:43 pm

DaveLeeNC View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Anyone with a Weight Weenie PEGORETTI

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

Bantamben

31

3820

Sun Oct 19, 2014 5:27 pm

ultimobici View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Five qualities of a weight weenie bike

in Cycle Chat

donald

14

1214

Wed Mar 26, 2014 11:29 pm

drainyoo View the latest post


It is currently Mon Oct 20, 2014 5:26 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB