HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:25 pm
Posts: 739
Location: Winterpeg
I would think that the opposite of WW would be the guy who chooses to ride old cheap beater bike and be snobby about it. Or not necessarily being snobby, but making concious choices to downgrade their gear.

_________________
http://demarere.blogspot.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:53 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:31 pm
Posts: 459
I guess it's a hand built frame in ye olde steel that has some pretensions to fit the bod, lightish but reliable equipage from the world's leading brands- read Campy if you can-and a comfy saddle that doesn't cost a zillion quid and won't cut your arse to pieces.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:49 pm
Posts: 1581
Location: Near Horgen, Switzerland
I think we call that 'Sensible' :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3331
Location: Natovi Landing
OJ wrote:
I would think that the opposite of WW would be the guy who chooses to ride old cheap beater bike and be snobby about it. Or not necessarily being snobby, but making concious choices to downgrade their gear.


LOL. Would that be the direct opposite though?

I imagine more that the opposite would be someone who hapharzardly chooses all their equipment with little thought and stumbles somehow into a 30lb road bike that looks like cack.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 148
OMG it's Gabe from the office.

Arky wrote:
As Prendrefeu noted, it is psychological. Years ago when I used a bike trailer, I had the same effect. You tend to want to go the same speed as you would without the extra load. You push it harder due to psychology. Plus, you get used to tne load and when you do not have it, you feel like you are having a no chain day.


prendrefeu wrote:
The effects are all psychological.
Power outputs would be the same.


No.
He's always getting his wires crossed as to what's psychological and what isn't.

There is a definite training effect. When you feed the warrior 20lb, it's more a question of going hard, longer. This is what builds endurance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Posts: 7412
Location: Los Angeles / Glendale, California
Horse.
You really need better things to do than attempt to target me on Weight Weenies. Besides, while one of my degrees in Psych is not a doctorate, I do have a better understanding of human psychology than most people. Run some numbers over at analytic cycling and you'll find that the gains are minimal for 'endurance'. For pure strength, it will be minor. There are better ways to train.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90861

Besides, if this method/approach of training were effective, do you think that professional athletes whose very career depends on performance would train in this method? They don't. The training bike is not much different from the race bike, maybe add a saddlebag for tools and a pump if going without a coach, switch tubulars to clinchers, but overall it's nearly the same set up as the race bike.

I stand by my statement. I'm not Arky.

_________________
Exp001 || TeamLACBC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:31 pm
Posts: 459
mrfish wrote:
I think we call that 'Sensible' :)


So I guess I'm a sensible near weight weenie; i just need to lose 30kg and i'll be there, throwing the oeuvre of Dash here there and everywhere, except my rear, whose saddles it greatly fears.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 148
prendrefeu wrote:
Horse.
You really need better things to do than attempt to target me on Weight Weenies. Besides, while one of my degrees in Psych is not a doctorate, I do have a better understanding of human psychology than most people. Run some numbers over at analytic cycling and you'll find that the gains are minimal for 'endurance'. For pure strength, it will be minor. There are better ways to train.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90861" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Besides, if this method/approach of training were effective, do you think that professional athletes whose very career depends on performance would train in this method? They don't. The training bike is not much different from the race bike, maybe add a saddlebag for tools and a pump if going without a coach, switch tubulars to clinchers, but overall it's nearly the same set up as the race bike.

I stand by my statement. I'm not Arky.



Nonsense.

This discussion is not the standard content of Psychology nomenclature. There are psychological aspects to sport. But this is not one of them. You're posting to every post on the forum regurgitating what you're read in other posts and manage to melange different things together producing a constant stream of worthless commentary. We don't want to read this. We don't need a self-qualified WW poster with trumped up credentials going back however long.

Back on topic. I said there is a training effect. How you put that training to use and to what extent is altogether another story.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:09 am
Posts: 344
horse wrote:
This discussion is not the standard content of Psychology nomenclature. There are psychological aspects to sport. But this is not one of them. You're posting to every post on the forum regurgitating what you're read in other posts and manage to melange different things together producing a constant stream of worthless commentary. We don't want to read this. We don't need a self-qualified WW poster with trumped up credentials going back however long.

Back on topic. I said there is a training effect. How you put that training to use and to what extent is altogether another story.


I'm sorry, but I think your vendetta with Prefendru is clouding your thinking abilities.

You are completely confused here. Track sprinters do use weights, but that's specific, limited, training, for muscular training, just as a well known training used by pro's is running a big gear uphill in slow cadence for a very short time.

Running unaerodynamic frames, weights, rubbing brakes etc. in prolonged efforts (longer than a few minutes) this will logically just lead to the same wattage being spent. Or do you argue I somehow can spend more energy on a heavier bike, o magically just get bigger reserves just by switching bikes? :roll:

This is simple logic. My body can exert X watts in Y time. The bike (if geometry is the same) will not change that one bit. In fact there is a very good argument to make that it's better to train on a similar set up as your race machine as you would get used to the fit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
What's the opposite of weight weenie?

Someone whose bar tape does not match their saddle. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 635
Location: The Taint of the USA!
A Fat Frank(furter)?

_________________
2013 Madone 5, Superfly
2012 SpeedConcept 7, Cobia


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 9:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:04 pm
Posts: 54
My commuting/ Touring bike weighs 38 pounds..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 10:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:45 am
Posts: 83
Location: Bristol, UK
38lb :| my old DH bike was 20kg+ (44-45lb) and could be ridden off houses (proven), sure your tourer isn't a motorbike with a missing engine? :P
I rode it to work everyday for 2 years with a 3" rear tyre... it was a slow ride.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:04 pm
Posts: 54
DrGalactus wrote:
38lb :| my old DH bike was 20kg+ (44-45lb) and could be ridden off houses (proven), sure your tourer isn't a motorbike with a missing engine? :P
I rode it to work everyday for 2 years with a 3" rear tyre... it was a slow ride.


That does include the rear rack, trunk bag with rain gear, beam bag with, extra tubes, tools, hyper cracker, spokes. Dyno hub+ lights. 719 wheels, handlebar bag, softride stem, 2 water bottles. 719 rims, 32/36 Powertap hub.
Does have a carbon fork and handlebars.

Adds up I guess.
In my weight weenie defense, I am working on a 10lb Evo project.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am
Posts: 4479
Location: Canada
Nah, you guys are all missingthe 'weenies' part. An 'anti-weight weenie' would be the guy who consciously selects more durable, reliable equipment even though it's heavier and more expensive! You know, wheels that don't break, saddles that are more comfortable, PowerMeters that always work, etc. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:42 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Are there other weight weenie forums?

in MTB

nrsnow

2

897

Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:52 pm

cerro View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Anyone with a Weight Weenie PEGORETTI

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

Bantamben

32

3980

Mon Oct 20, 2014 6:12 pm

wilwil View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Weight Weenie Project

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

DaveLeeNC

19

1732

Sun Jul 27, 2014 11:43 pm

DaveLeeNC View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Old School Weight Weenie

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

01Erion

21

3260

Fri Jan 10, 2014 4:38 pm

CBJ View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Five qualities of a weight weenie bike

in Cycle Chat

donald

14

1214

Wed Mar 26, 2014 11:29 pm

drainyoo View the latest post


It is currently Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:40 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB