HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 2:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:18 am
Posts: 211
I have the option to choose between an
Standard bar and a aero bar. Can anyone share with me any diff? Aero bar is a bit heavier. I
Have to seriously consider a bar for my new bike and 1st time to road.

And I have the option between

1) ritchey super logic 2 - standard
2) Easton ec90SLX3 standard and aero
3) 3t - one of the lightest but can remember which model.


Any advise.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 680
Location: it's raining, it must be uk
assuming you are talking about standard drop bars with an aero profile, rather than full-on aero bars, in a review that zipp references on its website it says c. 5w saving with vukasprint bars

for wheels, zipp usually quotes based on riding at 300w at 48km/hr

presumably the 5w came from zipp and is based on a similar screnario, so if you ride fast for a long time, there'll be some benefit, but it's not huge

the blurb for easton aero ones seems to say the aero benefit comes from changed rider position, i can't see the bars themselves beating the zipp ones for drag

fwiw after finding lighter bars/stem too flexy (deda newton bars, zero 100 stem), i accepted that i needed to go heavier if wanted stiff, experimented and in the end i got a cinelli ram2 integrated, the extra weight was well worth it, no flex at all

now some say the zero 100 is a stiff stem, but of course it depends on your weight, power, riding style etc., if you do put a lot of oomph through the bars on hard climbs or sprints then it's something to consider


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 12:39 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 9:54 am 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:38 am
Posts: 58
worth learning about :thumbup:

_________________
like us on facebook
yishun bike: cost-effective carbon wheels/frame/bike parts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 12:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:18 am
Posts: 211
And how I have the option to use deda 35mm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 981
Location: Sweden
Please excuse my thread-jacking, but does anyone have some numbers for watt savings with dropbars and aero clip-ons/extensions vs actual flat TT bar, when riding in the same position on the extensions? Ie, how much will the un-used drops with STI's/brifters hold one back, compared to wing shaped TT basebar with just aero brake levers?

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 12:23 am
Posts: 169
I genuinely think the fastest one is whichever is most comfortable for you. If the bar can keep you in a good position over the course of a ride, you'll almost certainly earn back that 5w savings.

If all are equal on comfort, then go for aero or lightest or stiffest as your priorities dictate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:19 pm
Posts: 653
clarkson wrote:
I genuinely think the fastest one is whichever is most comfortable for you. If the bar can keep you in a good position over the course of a ride, you'll almost certainly earn back that 5w savings.

If all are equal on comfort, then go for aero or lightest or stiffest as your priorities dictate.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Best post ever on this forum...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:18 am
Posts: 211
i ended up with this stem and bar


Attachments:
File comment: i ended up with this!
IMG_1124.jpg
IMG_1124.jpg [ 110.07 KiB | Viewed 1295 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 2:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Posts: 7468
Location: Los Angeles / Glendale, California
mjduct wrote:
clarkson wrote:
I genuinely think the fastest one is whichever is most comfortable for you. If the bar can keep you in a good position over the course of a ride, you'll almost certainly earn back that 5w savings.

If all are equal on comfort, then go for aero or lightest or stiffest as your priorities dictate.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Best post ever on this forum...


Nah...

This is.

_________________
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:39 pm
Posts: 144
DMF wrote:
Please excuse my thread-jacking, but does anyone have some numbers for watt savings with dropbars and aero clip-ons/extensions vs actual flat TT bar, when riding in the same position on the extensions? Ie, how much will the un-used drops with STI's/brifters hold one back, compared to wing shaped TT basebar with just aero brake levers?


Numbers in the order of about 30-40w, depends how narrow you are and how good the aerobar is too! Its quite a lot of tubing/sti sticking out in the wind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:14 am
Posts: 981
Location: Sweden
Holy cow! I would have figured it'd be closer to one third of that, tops.... The TT-bars are going on the roadbike ASAP. Rarely use the drops since I got the extensions anyway. Having to reach for the shifters when on the "hoods" seems very minor compared to 30+ watts when on the gas...

_________________

The Shivenge


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7727
Location: San Francisco, CA
Are the Zipp data with or without a rider? Since rider is drafting behind bars seems it would make a big difference.

I don't understand those 35 mm bars unless you're a 100 kg sprinter or have very wide shoulders. A bit of bar flex acts as suspension. There can be too much, perhaps, but those seem way overkill.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk 2

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3675
Location: Natovi Landing
Machinenoise wrote:
DMF wrote:
Please excuse my thread-jacking, but does anyone have some numbers for watt savings with dropbars and aero clip-ons/extensions vs actual flat TT bar, when riding in the same position on the extensions? Ie, how much will the un-used drops with STI's/brifters hold one back, compared to wing shaped TT basebar with just aero brake levers?


Numbers in the order of about 30-40w, depends how narrow you are and how good the aerobar is too! Its quite a lot of tubing/sti sticking out in the wind.


I can't believe the drops will generate 30-40W of drag ... e.g. 1/8th of the threshold power of a decent amateur ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 7:13 am
Posts: 1536
Machinenoise wrote:
DMF wrote:
Please excuse my thread-jacking, but does anyone have some numbers for watt savings with dropbars and aero clip-ons/extensions vs actual flat TT bar, when riding in the same position on the extensions? Ie, how much will the un-used drops with STI's/brifters hold one back, compared to wing shaped TT basebar with just aero brake levers?


Numbers in the order of about 30-40w, depends how narrow you are and how good the aerobar is too! Its quite a lot of tubing/sti sticking out in the wind.


That sounds high to me. Of course it depends on speed.

For instance, going from a Specialized Tarmac with clipons on a handlebar to a Specialized Transition with a tt setup and otherwise the same variable you get a 20 watt advantage and that is divided up between the frameset, position and then the better aerobar:
http://www.bikeradar.com/gear/article/h ... ero-19273/

So maybe more like 5 watts at 25mph?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 3500
Location: Surrey B.C. Canada
I never use the drops so I went this way.

Image
Image

_________________
BIG DADDY B FLOW
AERO & LIGHT is RIGHT

Cervelo SLC 5960g/13.13 lbs


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:37 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 11.4, alexapi32, beanbiken, bikerjulio, CanadianBiker, cendres, dunbar42, egebhardt, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], koryo, NJBiker72 and 80 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Mid compact flex on standard 5 bolt?

in Road

itsacarr

11

515

Tue Feb 10, 2015 1:17 pm

NiFTY View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Road Disc - Through Axle or Standard Quick Release?

in Road

Mr.Gib

14

1197

Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:45 am

padmasana View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero

[ Go to page: 1 ... 11, 12, 13 ]

in Road

Bridgeman

180

6878

Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:20 pm

SuperDave View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. F8 Aero Data?

in Road

sethjs

3

436

Sun Jun 28, 2015 12:04 pm

goodboyr View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero Chainring

in Road

Tapeworm

6

389

Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:53 pm

ichobi View the latest post


It is currently Tue Aug 04, 2015 9:16 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB