2013 Sram Red BB30 in and weighed
Moderator: robbosmans
I just recieved my BB30 Sram Red crankset in 175 53X39 567 grams.. not bad. I will be taking out for some miles and I will come back with all the details. On the stand it shifts very smooth and much better than the CDale Hollowgram SL crank I had on.
quess the weight is excluding bearings? Including spacers/shims and such parts?
/jonas l
http://instagram.com/jonaslundb
http://instagram.com/jonaslundb
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
did you weigh the chainrings?
- prendrefeu
- Posts: 8580
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: Glendale / Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
2012, not 2013.
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:43 am
Would the weight on 170 cranks compared to 175 make a big difference?
- 2012 Specialized Tarmac w/ Force
- 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10-5 w/ Ultegra
- 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10-5 w/ Ultegra
upside wrote:Yup, just the crankset with spindle. The last Sram Red crank I had was 615 grams so it looks like they have lost some weight. It can't be far off Hollowgram though.
so was it with chainrings or not?
my hollow gram sisl was 574 grams with chainrings AND bearings, so it´s "far off"
[quote="JensW"][quote="upside"]Yup, just the crankset with spindle. The last Sram Red crank I had was 615 grams so it looks like they have lost some weight. It can't be far off Hollowgram though.[/quote]
so was it with chainrings or not?
my hollow gram sisl was 574 grams with chainrings AND bearings, so it´s "far off" [/quote]
It was with chain rings. I wanted to complete the new Sram group and have been waiting some time for the last part. I was running the Hollowgram with Sram Red/Black rings and front shifting was almost on par with Dura Ace. Will see today when the horses come out to play.
so was it with chainrings or not?
my hollow gram sisl was 574 grams with chainrings AND bearings, so it´s "far off" [/quote]
It was with chain rings. I wanted to complete the new Sram group and have been waiting some time for the last part. I was running the Hollowgram with Sram Red/Black rings and front shifting was almost on par with Dura Ace. Will see today when the horses come out to play.
- Frankie - B
- Admin - In the industry
- Posts: 6573
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
- Location: Drenthe, Holland
Thanks for letting us know. please upload the weight into the "new" listings. Thanks!
If you want to see 'meh' content of me and my bike you can follow my life in pictures here!'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'
JensW wrote:upside wrote:Yup, just the crankset with spindle. The last Sram Red crank I had was 615 grams so it looks like they have lost some weight. It can't be far off Hollowgram though.
so was it with chainrings or not?
my hollow gram sisl was 574 grams with chainrings AND bearings, so it´s "far off"
I did a comparison of the drive side arm, spider, rings, and spindle at my LBS a couple weeks ago and my SiSL setup was ~80g lighter. Unfortunately I don't rember the exact weights, or if I weighed mine with the stock rings or my Praxis rings (+33g). In any case, the Cannondale setup was significantly lighter.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com