Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:34 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:39 pm
Posts: 3
I had my new wheelset narrowed down to these two. At claimed weights of 1561 and 1250 grams respectively, I was really on the fence. I weighed both and actual weights were 1481 and 1300, again respectively. Still a tough choice but I went with the Zipps. I've owned both the 303 and 404 tubulars and I'm a huge Zipp fan already, so familiarity definitely played a role. I'll certainly consider Mad Fiber again in the future and I'll bet we see some great surprises from them as well as continuing evolution from Zipp and Enve. It seems to be the Golden Age of wheels.


Top
   
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:05 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:40 pm
Posts: 316
Location: CA
Wow your 404s were 80g lighter than claimed? Anyone else seen this? Any real world weights for a 303FC Clincher? Interested as I'm on the fence between 404 and 303 clinchers. I wonder if Zipp is claiming the 404s are heavier than they really are so they don't step on the 303s toes when comparing specs.

I would have picked the Zipp's over the MFs as well in your position, especially with the Zipps coming 80g under and the MFs coming 50g over.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:23 am
Posts: 662
Location: so. cal.
They are different wheels
If you value aero qualities then the zipp
Its for you.
If you value stiffness the madfibers are for you.
The zipp are more aero, but the madfibers are lighter, stiffer, and have better hubs.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:56 pm
Posts: 282
billspreston wrote:
Wow your 404s were 80g lighter than claimed? Anyone else seen this? Any real world weights for a 303FC Clincher? Interested as I'm on the fence between 404 and 303 clinchers. I wonder if Zipp is claiming the 404s are heavier than they really are so they don't step on the 303s toes when comparing specs.



665g front 2012 303 fc clincher
795g rear 2012 303 fc clincher

sans rimstrip and skewer


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:26 am
Posts: 558
Location: USA
Man, at those weights why are you spending so much money on bling. If you want carbon wheels, tubular is the only way to gain any benefit for your money spent. Just one man's opinion.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:39 pm
Posts: 3
Yes, I agree. Zipp 404 tubulars are lighter and cheaper. Seemingly a no-brainer. I rode them last summer and loved them but I got a flat far from the car that my sealant wouldn't fix. I generally have nobody to call for a ride either. I know, no big deal. I'll give up the performance though, for being able to pop in a tube and finish my ride. Obviously just my opinion, and I still question it myself. I still haven't returned my Mad Fibers though and now I'm wondering about the Zipp/Mad Fiber thing again, The Mads are just so light. I'm bad at decisions


Top
   
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:52 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 10:42 am
Posts: 111
My Zipp 303 tubs (2011, not FC) came in at 1137 against a claimed 1181, so maybe they do err on the conservative side (would be pretty much a first I know...)


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Scratch in 2016 Zipp 202 Firecrest Carbon Clincher

in Road

Morta

5

508

Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:01 pm

em3 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 202 Firecrest clincher flex

in Road

thencameyou

8

1099

Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:10 am

kgt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. FLO launched 45mm, 60 and 90 carbon clincher

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 ]

in Road

mpulsiv

59

3847

Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:30 pm

CrankAddictsRich View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Descending with carbon clincher still an issue?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

riochang

34

3817

Thu Mar 03, 2016 5:37 am

ktw7937 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Carbon Clincher Rim Brake Tracks NexGen - Experiences?

in Road

Beaver

11

1034

Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:10 am

superdx View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Dalai, fitrataramizar, grumpus, pantelones, spooky817, Yahoo [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited