Which 11-28 cassette is better

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

PoorCyclist
Posts: 783
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 am
Location: California's country side

by PoorCyclist

Can you suggest which 11-28 cassette to get for rides with nasty climbs..

Ultegra CS-6700 vs Force PG-1070
the listing says 6700 is 230g
and the SRAM is 239g,
not sure how accurate because I thought usually SRAM is lighter?

The 6700 is quieter and the SRAM is a little louder

The gearing is

SRAM
11-12-13-14-15-17-19-22-25-28

Shimano
11-12-13-14-15-17-19-21-24-28

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
btompkins0112
Posts: 2635
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Location: Mississippi

by btompkins0112

Weights are probably pretty accurate on those......think I weighed them at my LBS when i was purchasing a new cassette and they were pretty close for the 12/25 variety.

As far as the gearing goes it looks like the Shimano would give you a bit more options in the higher gears for those climbs......just a single tooth difference in the 21-25 range, but options are options.

I would go with the Ultegra..... :beerchug:

sbh1973
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:08 am
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

by sbh1973

I would go with the Ultegra too. I had a SRAM Red 11-28 that came with the SRAM Red group on my Kestrel and I just hated it - and the SRAM chain. Loud, poor shifting - fiddled with it for weeks and almost felt like selling the bike. Put an Ultegra cassette and chain on the bike and it was like butter.

Now, this was just my experience - so don't beat me up if you love these components. But from what I read around the internets, I wasn't the only one who solved their SRAM shifting problem with a Shimano cassette and chain. Now I'm perfectly happy with SRAM Red.

User avatar
theremery
Posts: 2658
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:56 am
Location: New Zealand

by theremery

Ultegra is quieter but the Sram is better in the "struggle" gears. If you are putting a 28 on you'll prefer the 25 and 28 option to the 24 and 28 (I personally found this quite odd and too much of a jump). Both can be made to shift OK. Ultegras shifting is flawless on a good shimano chain and using a shimano chain, so is Srams. The noise kicks in on the SRAM when you use the sram chain. I know this is counter-intuitive but it's definitely what I've found to be the case.
Updated: Racing again! Thought this was unlikely! Eventually, I may even have a decent race!
Edit: 2015: darn near won the best South Island series (got second in age
-group)..woo hoo Racy Theremery is back!!

PoorCyclist
Posts: 783
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 am
Location: California's country side

by PoorCyclist

Well.. the Dura-Ace chain even new make a buzz that is very similar to standing under a electric powerline tower. I am not sure this has to do with chainring or cassette, but using Ultegra cassette with it.

The SRAM 1071 or 1091 chains does not make this sound and over all much quieter as it aged. They are really smooth running for me..

ScottGoBlue
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:38 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA

by ScottGoBlue

PoorCyclist wrote:SRAM
11-12-13-14-15-17-19-22-25-28

Shimano
11-12-13-14-15-17-19-21-24-28

I used to use a Shimano 11-28, and then when I got a new bike with a SRAM drive-train, I moved to a SRAM 11-28. I didn't think it would matter, but I've found that I really like the "25" as my second lowest. There were some situations (one particularly long 6%+ grade climb) for me where, when I had the Shimano the "24" was a little too high so I was kinda forced into spinning the 28. Now, on the same climb, I can switch between 25 and 28 depending on how I feel. I guess I never thought it would make much difference ... but I've liked it.

After typing my response... I saw this. My experience has been similar! :D
theremery wrote:Sram is better in the "struggle" gears. If you are putting a 28 on you'll prefer the 25 and 28 option to the 24 and 28 (I personally found this quite odd and too much of a jump).


Scott

Horacio
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:28 am

by Horacio

I just went through this a week ago.

For the longest I've been running the Ultegra 11-28. I love the 11 for the flats!
I just swapped out to the DuraAce 12-27. Didnt think it would be that drastic of a change but DAMN...what a difference! I see some 17% grades and I really had to grind it out to make it up the hill! The 11-28 is more comfortable.
The chain does make a lot of noise in the 28. Not so much with the 27.

Weights of my cassettes;
Ultegra 11-28 235g
DA 12-27 194g
DA 12-25 190g

Front rings are DA 7900 53x39
(Sorry to get bit ot.)
Last edited by Horacio on Fri Apr 06, 2012 3:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
tommasini
Posts: 1460
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:48 am
Location: Central USA
Contact:

by tommasini

might help to note the front chainrings too.

My guess is you're using a compact?....which is XX x XX teeth??

User avatar
slyboots
Posts: 444
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 3:31 pm
Location: Russia, Moscow

by slyboots

Shimano all the way. SRAM 11-28 has this stupid big 19-22 jump in the more used part of the cassette versus Shimano's 24-28 at the very end. I wonder what was SRAM guys thinking - if they really wanted to not have 24-28, they should have gone with 11-12-13-14-16-18-20-22-25-28.

VTBike
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 8:14 pm

by VTBike

This is all super interesting... I just finally upgraded from a Dura-Ace 9spd 12-27 cassette, for the 2012 SRAM Red 11-28. I think on the steepest grades here in VT, i'm really going to love the 28; but I never considered the considerable tooth jump. I wonder if it will make an actual difference for me or not. It seems like the jump is in the top 1/3 of the cassette though - and I typically stay in the middle to bottom 3rd for most riding, so I'm hoping it makes no difference to me. Weight wise, my new Red cassette is 153g; so about 30g lighter than the D/A i'm coming off of. I'm running a KCMC X10sl chain, so will also be interesting to see what the road noise will be like. Taking my first real ride on the new stuff (been on the rollers all week) this weekend.

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm

by Rick

I have both of those, so I can compare directly:
Both have those "odd" jumps", just in different places. So it sort of depend on the particular terrain as to which works better. I definitely NOTICE it more on very steep, long climbs, where I vastly prefer the 25-28 of the SRAM.

BUT, generally speaking, the Shimano cassettes shift much more smoothly and quietly than SRAM, even on my all-Sram drivetrain.

I also have a Tiagra 12-28 just to try to reduce the odd jumps when I know I will be doing a lot of climbing.
12 13 14 15 17 19 21 23 25 28

I couldn't find an Ultegra or DA in 12-28
they should have gone with 11-12-13-14-16-18-20-22-25-28.

That is what I think also!
Last edited by Rick on Fri Apr 06, 2012 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

gmitt98
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:49 pm

by gmitt98

I haven't had good shifting experiences on SRAM cassettes in general. Plus, they are just too loud for my tastes.

Chris_W
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:20 am
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland

by Chris_W

I agree that SRAM doesn't shift quite as well as Shimano, and I hate the 19-22 jump in the middle of the SRAM cassette.

Do you really need the 11? As mentioned above, the Tiagra 12-28 cassette has the best gear combinations IMO. For me, the cog sizes and shift quality are more important than the weight for a cassette. Even the Tiagra 12-30 cassette offers better cog sizes than the SRAM 11-28 (again because there is no 19-22 jump). Shimano have announced that there will be a much lighter, Ultegra-level cassette in 12-30 released sometime this summer (along with a new version of the Ultegra RD which can officially handle a 30 tooth cog, although the current version almost always can already).

oreoboreo
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 2:25 pm
Location: Aloha, Oregon/ Poipu, Kauai Hawaii

by oreoboreo

ScottGoBlue wrote:
PoorCyclist wrote:SRAM
11-12-13-14-15-17-19-22-25-28

Shimano
11-12-13-14-15-17-19-21-24-28

I used to use a Shimano 11-28, and then when I got a new bike with a SRAM drive-train, I moved to a SRAM 11-28. I didn't think it would matter, but I've found that I really like the "25" as my second lowest. There were some situations (one particularly long 6%+ grade climb) for me where, when I had the Shimano the "24" was a little too high so I was kinda forced into spinning the 28. Now, on the same climb, I can switch between 25 and 28 depending on how I feel. I guess I never thought it would make much difference ... but I've liked it.

After typing my response... I saw this. My experience has been similar! :D
theremery wrote:Sram is better in the "struggle" gears. If you are putting a 28 on you'll prefer the 25 and 28 option to the 24 and 28 (I personally found this quite odd and too much of a jump).


Scott


Not sure if it is a Scott thing, however I found the same thing. The solution is get stronger and dump the 28, that is what my buddies tell me.
Let's finish the ride with a 20% grade.

2011 Scott Addict R1 DA 7900 Matt black
2012 Scott CR1 Pro Ultegra 6700
2015 Specialized SWorks Tarmac Da 9000
2016 Specialized SWorks Tarmac DA 9100

maxxevv
Posts: 2012
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:51 am

by maxxevv

Do you really need the 11 ?? Else I think the Tiagra 12-28 or the 12-30 would have a pretty nice set of cogs

12-13-14-15-17-19-21-23-25-28

12-13-24-15-17-19-21-24-27-30

Something worth considering ??? :noidea:

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply